Hey Guys! PeerTracks already has it's logo for its or company.

Now what we don't have is a logo for either BitShares Music as a whole or just the Notes.

Might just have one work for both. Like Bitcoin's B is the logo to represent the units + the blockchain/network.

Any ideas?

We have an idea to make our logo customizable so that ANY and all genres find their own version.

The plain red one is the "real" one but wait till you see the other ones we have in store

We have a P with bling
One with a cowboy hat and scarf lol

Beanie baby logos

Here is the Reddit link:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2iw532/bitshares_music_peertracks/

Here is the bitcointalk link (I put it under "alternate cryptocurrencies, is that good?)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=819163.new#new

Upvote and comment! Let's get this DAC out there.

Here is the Reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2iw532/bitshares_music_peertracks/

Here is the bitcointalk. (I put it under "alternate cryptocurrencies, is that good?)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=819163.new#new

Upvote and comment! Let's get this DAC out there.

About to advertise on bitcointalk and reddit.

Guys ready to comment, defend and upvote?! haha. Ready for war with miners?

As it is now  PeerTracks does not make any money for sales of the artist coin or songs. So the only way to make money it is to buy NOTES and hope to make enough profit to cover bandwidth cost and development. This model can't work, i.e  if a company in China want's to make  PeerTrackChina I will have 0 incentive to go all this trouble to build it. It is much easier to just buy the NOTES and make a profit and not bother with all trouble building the website bandwidth etc. Or even better they will clone Bitshare Music and they will lunch on a different chain.
So if we want Bitshares  Music to become the music DAC that everybody will use, then others company needs to have the incentive to build on top of it. I think the best way will be that each company should be able to set a percentage of the sales that is going as profit.

Agreed. Each company will set their own fee. Some companies might set their fee to 0% if they can cover costs some other way and attract more artists/users to their platform because of that low fee.
PeerTracks would like to be that 0% fee website right out the gates if possible.

..whether the Notes PeerTracks will hold will be enough to repay the bandwidth costs..  But you are saying that PeerTrack does't hold  any NOTES or funds ??

No PeerTracks will definitely have some Notes. But it's impossible to calculate just how much revenue those will generate. Maybe those Notes will cover costs, maybe not. If not, then we will have no choice but to charge a extra % for the service.

( If it's not enough then a fee will be charged for that) The fee that PeerTrack will charge will be coded in the front(PeerTrack website) or it will be integrated in the back end( Bitshare Music Dac) ?

It would be front end of course.
The backend fee is to ANYONE that has Notes. So any DAC "share"holders benefit from this fee. PeerTracks will be a Noteholder as well. Compared to most noteholders PeerTracks will have expenses, since as you said it's cheaper to just buy Notes and sit on them then to build a site.
In that sense it makes total sense for PeerTracks to charge a fee on top of this. But remember websites have other means of monetization. If having low (no) fees help PeerTracks draw traffic then we are good.
Facebook is free for example.

Basically. The plan is for PeerTracks to see if holding notes + traditional monetization are enough to cover costs and make a profit.
A front end fee can be added if need be.
Simple enough (:

One more think. Why you don't take a small fee that goes directly to Bisthares Music Foundation in that way there will a continuous flow of founds that will be use by the Foundation for the development and other project of the DAC, so there will be  less need to inflate the Notes supply. I.E. 80% goes to the artist, 17% goes to buy back, 2%  you burn that goes to Notes holders and 1% you don't burn you put in the Foundation account .

The foundation will loose it's power as the project goes from start-up to established DAC.
Foundation = centralization

Once the DAC is mature, it will be hard to justify dilution and the only way dilution could happen is if Noteholders vote for a delegate that can convince them there is a project/idea that would greatlly benefit the DAC's ecosystem.

So no, there will be no hardcoded fee going to the foundation. It will all be done through delegates.

The people that sent btc before the official start will be counted in the first pool. No need to panic (: