Note to PTS holders... we didn't take your liquidity, we gave you liquidity.

PTS is liquid and remains liquid... holders were hoping for a future snapshot in a real DAC as obviously people don't want PTS just for PTS sake... until there is a "real dac" PTS holders are not really liquid.    Now they get gradual liquidity in a real DAC that is implementing all of the features they were hoping for. 

So you don't want to be locked in for a gradual 2 year release.... then sell to someone who is willing to be locked in for 2 years.  There are many buyers of PTS that are pricing in a discount for giving up liquidity and you have the option.    Be liquid and sell today... or get a larger stake over 2 years.

I am not care about liquidity.Because it was wrong at the begining.
What i really care about is that no one have the right to destroy the white paper, no one have the right to destroy the social contract, no one have the right to be a dictator of the community.
Why does a discussion turn into a decision?And it is necessary for us  to continue the discussion  on the wrong direction?
In other words,iii create the pts/ags/bts_toolkit/btsx and we admit,but you have no right to destroy them.When they were born, they belong to the community,not you.

I don't know whether you understand what I mean, but I want to discuss so far  so that we can reduce the loss of the community ASAP.

In order to save a stupid son btsx, mom and dad both have to be killed.So foolish.
Where is the spirit of a social contract?
Where is the white paper?
Where is the commitment of I3 before?
Where is the credit?

Do you think you are the god, bm? What a fuck!

I have a dream that one day there will be no dictator in BTS community.
I have a dream that one day btstoolkit will be used by many developers.
I have a dream that one day dac is konwn by erveryone.

同一个钱包在电脑A上做了一个short usd的单子，在电脑B上，市场不显示该单子并且交易显示币发往到“UNKNOWN”

alt, please vote for my delegate:(or just send 150,000 to account "mi")
wallet_account_set_approval delegate001.mi true   

sent

Code: [Select]

2014-08-30T15:20:11 23948     alt                 sfinder             10,000.00000 BDNS                                                   0.50000 BDNS        960b3d62


really sent？
mi (locked) >>> wallet_list_accounts
NAME (* delegate)                  KEY                                                             REGISTERED            FAVORITE       APPROVAL       
mi                                 KEY8eKQ6tM1JArmTDg7PF7WMFVJjUJo5kiEygmwyMRfvrFaE7516e           NO                    NO             0         
mi001                              KEY7qdFEEFiW178sYWHdi6UbJLUtgxcNuDZK3nZuuQbL1sQedwZQm           NO                    NO             0         
mi (locked) >>> wallet_account_balance mi
No balances found.
mi (locked) >>> wallet_account_balance mi001
No balances found.
mi (locked) >>> get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 10713,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "10 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-29T02:34:30",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "99.02 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,

sent

Can you send me some BDNS? 
KEY8eKQ6tM1JArmTDg7PF7WMFVJjUJo5kiEygmwyMRfvrFaE7516e

除了bitusd这种需要锚定的资产外，其它用btsx发型的资产都需要有一定的作用，比如可以发行自己公司的股票、期权之类的，即发行的资产本身是有价值的（可以去看nxt的资产发行，这两者是比较类似的）

熊大，有几个疑问：
1、btsx的价格和锚定没有什么关系吧？即使锚定成功了，btsx价格也不会暴涨或暴跌
2、1bitusd就是法币1usd？   这个bitusd的作用就是法币价值稳定（相对于btc来说） 是这个样子吗？
3、如果照现在这个样子（引入中心化交易所的BTSX实时价格），是不是最大能发行  (btsx usd市值)/2 个，现在大约是2千万usd/2=1千万bitusd
4、抵押btsx发行bitusd后，btsx价格涨了，那原来抵押的人岂不是赔了？还是系统会自动分发新增的bitusd给原来抵押的人？
5、bitusd是怎么流通的？能发送给别人吗？怎么对换usd法币