Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - matt608

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 59
46
Month 2 Update:
I posted some rolling updates as they came in this month.  These are the already announced updates originally posted on the previous pages of this thread:
 - Video from the 2nd meetup event in January:  BTC 2.0: Bitshares & Sidechains - Buenos Aires Meetup (2015-01-22)
- February meetup where 65 $1 bitUSD paper wallets given to different people at the event.  These are the event details and photos from the event.
- Got us a link from natural news and BeforeItsNews (article written in Janurary, but published in February).

Other achievements:
-  My main contribution this month is this animated explainer video script.  This is version 2 after a making edits based on feedback from my first draft.  I'm working on a third and hopefully final version now based on feedback.
 - Worked with rgcrypto + fran2k to have Spanish BitShares101 funnel set up.  It's now ready and viewable here
 - Started this thread about minebitshares at hashtalk.
 - Sponsored this small twitter marketing campaign by favdesu.
- General BitShares presence on article comments, bitcointalk, reddit and attendance of hangouts and providing opinions on various matters.
- I set up this reddit ad.  I spent $75 and recieved 63 clicks attaining a CPC of $1.19.  Despite getting a reasonable cost per click there was not a single sale of the book!   Due to this being a flop I will pay half the cost myself from my 200 BitUSD take home pay (deducting $37.5).

March Plan in brief:
- Continue funding for paper wallet giveaways at events (essential).
- Advertise events to make them larger - radio ads campaign for Buenos Aires being developed.
- Finish animated explainer video script.
- Use any 'spare' funds for bitshares101 funnel promotion on facebook.
- Be open to other opportunities.
- Pay myself back the delegate registration fee.

View the expenses spreadsheet.


47
General Discussion / Re: Bytemaster and Mumble - A Proposed Solution
« on: March 01, 2015, 08:08:43 am »

We are an international audience and there is no way in hell to make this fair if not recorded.

 +5%

48
General Discussion / Re: Cryptohedge brings bitUSD to Metaexchange!
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:27:08 pm »
Might I suggest the underscores on the trading pairs are replace by "/", that's how all the other exchanges do it.

49
General Discussion / Re: Cryptohedge brings bitUSD to Metaexchange!
« on: February 28, 2015, 10:22:10 pm »
Great!

50
General Discussion / Re: Instead of adding BitShares to a Bitcoin wallet...
« on: February 28, 2015, 11:54:07 am »
Can you feel it???  We are tantalizingly close to biggest crypto home run since bitcoin itself.   

As most on this thread are already very astute too...  Messaging and positioning is critical.  I would brand it a whole new thing(Coinstamp for example) and it would be a "decentralized bitcoin exchange."  The experience would actually be just like going to bitfinex.

You would deposit bitcoin.  Your account would say you have bitcoin, just like bitfinex says even though what you really have is bitfinexbitcoin. The difference is Coinstamp coin is really bitbtc and it is real time cryptographically provably solvent.  You can use your imagination for the rest.   If bitfinex/bitstamp/btc-e make no distinction between their IOU's and the real thing why should we?  The catch is stealing their liquidity.  When bitfinex started, they used bitstamp liquidity to get themselves up and running.   Apart from some simple GUI stuff, that is the final piece.   And of course and USD/bitUSD gateway.

 +5%

51
The challenge we face is complex and to do with the organizational structure of a horizontal hierarchy where there is no 'inside' and 'outside', no efficient top-down corporate structure, making business operations, such as branding and PR and getting anything done to a professional "official" standard very difficult.  This is a side-effect of the decentralisation required to be secure from shutdown. 

It's not about a communication problem between East and West, but still I'm curious to see what comes of the event and might be able to attend some of it.

52
General Discussion / Re: www.bitassets.io
« on: February 27, 2015, 02:06:01 pm »
Are there any concerns about SEO due this!? Guess not, but maybe i'm wrong
I highly reommend using 301 redirection instead of assigning the site to the domain

the domain could be seen as it would use duplicated content from bitshares.org

 +5% It's already appearing in Google, needs to be a redirect to bitshares.org.

53
General Discussion / Re: fav-marketing Initiative
« on: February 26, 2015, 10:36:59 pm »
great and  nice banner there are using  :P

 +5%

Indeed! :)

Are there more ad-ready banners?  468x60 for example?

Maybe in the media kit? Haven't looked for that specific size myself:
https://bitshares.org/mediakit

54
General Discussion / Re: Should Bytemaster's Hangouts Continue? (POLL)
« on: February 26, 2015, 10:09:55 pm »
Yes of course they should continue, but I have no problem with his appearance being shorter and where he has a pre-arranged plan of what to say and then just take a few questions.  There doesn't need to be a long drawn out consultation every week, but hearing an update from him is good. 


55
General Discussion / Re: Twitter Marketing
« on: February 26, 2015, 04:55:26 pm »
Sent!  :)

56
General Discussion / Re: Twitter Marketing
« on: February 26, 2015, 03:57:20 pm »
thinking about marketing, I'd like to put some bitUSD on cryptothrift for sale. Free advertisement.

Still don't know if there's a marketing fund I could contact. :(

How much do you need?  I have a small amount of available marketing funds you could use.  Presumably once you've sold it you could re-buy with the income and keep doing it?

57
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proposal: add the bitDOGE market-pegged asset
« on: February 26, 2015, 12:33:27 pm »
I support this as an easy way to attract interest from a huge community. I also think we should add Ripple as a market pegged asset. The best solution would be to simply replace OIL and DIESEL with DOGE and RPY in a future hard-fork. Those two are proving impossible to get started and we'd be much better off having Ripple and Doge.
what do you mean by a future hard fork?

A client update requiring a hard fork, like most of the client updates.
I thought a Bitasset can be created by anyone -> then needs 51 price feeds for it -> then it has a market.
Is it instead the developers (Vikram) decides what Bitassets there are?

No you're right, anyone can create them, but to make XRP you need to pay 500k BTS in order to make an asset you have no control over, so it'll never happen.

However we used to have PPC, LTC and others but those were changed in a hard-fork and replaced with DIESEL and OIL. What I'm proposing is to remove the useless OIL and DIESEL assets and replace them with something useful.

Why replace them?  A way to get feeds might be found.  Is there a limit to the number of BitAssets the system can support?

Also I doubt BitALTs will get the support of their communities because they compete with the real coin.  I wouldn't want there to be a BitDoge on BitShares if I held dogecoin.  The real coin needs to be locked up as collateral so that it's not a form of inflation. 

58
General Discussion / Re: Instead of adding BitShares to a Bitcoin wallet...
« on: February 25, 2015, 09:37:29 pm »
Isn't it already called the BitShares decentralised exchange?

Bitcoiners know BitBTC isn't real BTC.  It doesn't have the same appeal as having a wallet that holds real BTC.  It just can't be sold as a bitcoin wallet without holding real BTC.

But still metaexchagne/shapeshift should be added into the wallet as a deposit method like you say, along with other deposit methods.   

So - both can be done!

59
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares now has a professional PR initiative
« on: February 25, 2015, 08:42:47 am »
I'm glad for this development.

The typos/missing words in the post undermine the whole thing though and it's over-apologetic.  I jumped on github last night to make corrections but they've not been edited in.  I'd like to know more about Dacx.

I'd be very happy to be an editor of the releases.

Writing sample:
http://forum.nullstreet.com/index.php/688-animated-explainer-video-script/p1#p7640

60
General Discussion / Re: Can't get BitShares DAC whitepaper
« on: February 24, 2015, 10:13:31 pm »
You can access the whitepaper from bitshares.org

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 59