- the fewer voteable dilution proposals (higher stakeholder confidence/certainty)
- the better the quality of the proposals
- the lower the level of freakout by stakeholders as at least some would have been exposed to the proposal many times on the forum and developed some trust towards the delegate during the preliminary proposal feedback process.
 - the higher the deflation from fee-burning!

-Let the stakeholders directly decide how many vote-able dilution proposals they want.
-Let the market decide the quality of the proposals (the better the proposal the more likely people will vote for it)
-You don't need a fee to do that. Right now many people have stepped forward and ask the community if their proposal was a good one.
-The fees-burned wouldn't even have an impact imo. But lets say they are big enough to have an impact, the delegate would probably want to dilute more to make up for the fee so it really wouldn't matter.


Edit:

Also maybe proposal makers should be required to run a delegate for at least 1 month before making an official voteable proposal.   That helps build trust and commitment to BTS by creating an intellectual overhead and proves they are capable of the basic delegate tasks.

Good idea, that could help us with the back up delegate problem. But again I don't think it should be a rule.

Quote from: emski on November 02, 2014, 11:39:05 am

Thanks for the translation neosp!

Everyone has different point of view and he is free to express it.
If someone dislikes sfinder's behavior - that is what the voting is for.

You cant say he is lying though. There is some truth in his words.
However if he uses this solely to influence the price then it is an issue.

you can see this,  another guy with name extremely similar to dacsunlimited is quoting what sfinder said and spreading FUD.  Actually I think this guy is just sfinder himself.  Only he will quote what he said.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10905.0

Yea this guy seems like really bad news.

Are there any other ways to get stake into the system and away from btc38/bter

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the biggest thing stopping people is bitUSD liquidity. Quite a few people are actively trading BTSX. They would use bitUSD the only problem is the low volume which is causing a ~3% wide spread. I have some BTSX on both bter and btc38 that I actively trade. I still trade in bitUSD but not with a large amount at all.

So increase liquidity is one solution. Another is wait till after the exchange votes, withdraw your money and vote. That might pressure exchanges to not want to vote since so much money is leaving at once.
But over all I think exchanges are voting with good intent. They have a large sum of money they are in charge of and by voting they are helping protect it.

//edit: rereading my post I begin to wonder if my time management is good ... taking the time to even answer those posts is kind of stupid ..

How are you suppose to catch up to bytemaster if you don't 

I posted on reddit so people will see this. You will not get away with this type of action. You can talk but you cant poll...Do you have something to hide???

They might have taken it down because it is a the same exact poll that was done about 2 weeks ago.

Having the ability to change the dilution rate with some established process that is deemed "hard but not impossible" is what is needed.

 

Quote from: Overthetop on November 01, 2014, 06:20:44 pm

Quote from: heyD on November 01, 2014, 06:08:41 pm

People are free to do whatever they want to, either telling the truth or lies is up to them.

But running delegates of BTS, especially occuping about 5 spots of the top 101, he should know what that means. Being a delegate means being a builder of the ecosystem, rather than a rumor monger or maeket manipulator.

Yes, The delegates should be the builder ,not the destroyer.

Let us check it out!

Please link to the post in the Chinese section. I will use google translate to attempt to understand the situation - and then vote accordingly.

Yes!

(This is an example of why this new system is great.  It results in Bitshares being built faster).

Yea when this is implemented this will be ground breaking. "The first block chain that can actually hire people!"