Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Empirical1

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 59
166
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum & BitShares Partnership?
« on: August 16, 2014, 01:22:15 am »
I think this is a good thing. Together we can build something better! Im just wondering if this might hurt us? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707237.0 i don't know to what extent do people think like that, if it's only a few or not. And there is always people who jump to conclusions or more suspicious about things (specially in the crypto world) but I hope people dont put us in the same bag as I haven't heard anything bad about this project and hopefully things will continue this way

They're each their own thing really & in here they just seem to be about finding the best solutions to solving problems which is probably best.

Even though I'm not an investor in Ethereum. It is the mainstream face of 'Bitcoin 2.0' & If Ethereum ends up saying Bitcoin doesn't work as a base for their vision of 2.0 but DPOS does, that's quite powerful.

Perhaps a lot more than that. We all know POW is dead but what about when the market realises that most 2.0 is going to built on DPOS?

I think BitShares is going all the way regardless but these strong partnerships in areas of mutual benefit can only add to that I feel.


 

167
General Discussion / Re: BTSX/BTC market open at Poloniex Exchange
« on: August 15, 2014, 08:13:49 pm »
BitsharesX  BTSX/BTC markets are now live at Poloniex. 

https://www.poloniex.com/exchange/btc_btsx.

Nice  +5%

168
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum & BitShares Partnership
« on: August 15, 2014, 07:04:31 pm »
for me you both are the brightest stars in crypto and if we good join forces with ethereum both projects could be improve a lot. so you are the alpha and the omega in bitshares  +5% +5%

 +5% 'Two heads are better than one' and now arguably the two best heads in crypto are working together for mutual benefit! It doesn't get much better than that! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q9VEKdoCkA


I re-posted it here... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740684.0

169
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum & BitShares Partnership
« on: August 15, 2014, 06:14:33 pm »
+5%  +5%  That sounds great! Thanks for letting us know!

I guess Vitalik must be happy for us to share that info? - That Vitalik/Ethereum is strongly considering DPOS?

Vitalik and I are not very "political" and mostly care about the best technology for the job.   I am merely expressing my perspective on the conversation and will let him speak for himself.   

 +5%

170
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum & BitShares Partnership
« on: August 15, 2014, 06:09:35 pm »
 +5%  +5%  That sounds great! Thanks for letting us know!

I guess Vitalik must be happy for us to share that info? - That Vitalik/Ethereum is strongly considering DPOS?

171
General Discussion / Re: Overstock to CryptoStock on LTB
« on: August 15, 2014, 05:40:58 pm »
 +5% Is a quality article.

172
General Discussion / Re: bter hacked and lost 50m nxt
« on: August 15, 2014, 05:34:20 pm »
I think NXT may have already fallen an additional 15% to what coinmarketcap is showing?

They're showing $0.033 but I think bter & cryptsy are not trading? BTC38?

The DGEX price is showing $0.027

173
General Discussion / Re: Earn 5% on your BitUSD Now with BitShares X
« on: August 15, 2014, 04:22:00 pm »

do you mean Vitalik Buterin?
good catch .. i read Vikram ..

so?

You heard me.  The v man himself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting!

As far as BitUSD5 is concerned, I don't pretend to understand these things, but

Does this mean that if you want to go long BitUSD, you're better off going long BitUSD5?

It seems likely the BitUSD5 peg will adjust lower to reflect the additional cost to the person going short, thereby nullifying the difference.

It seems like BitUSD5 would only be necessary in the event that there were not enough people willing to go long BitUSD. However if that were the case, the BitUSD peg would reflect that situation and trade at like $0.98, without the need to introduce BitUSD5. But I don't know.

174
General Discussion / Re: bter hacked and lost 50m nxt
« on: August 15, 2014, 02:55:37 pm »
Very good for BTSX obv.

Cannot disagree more!


Ya, large thefts are bad PR. The people sitting on the fence or the sidelines don't distinguish the details of which product or how it was taken. They just read, "$1.7M USD worth of BTC like money stolen".

Perhaps. I personally would have been dumping NXT for more BTSX and I would have expected others holding NXT to do the same. But yes perhaps the implications are bigger.

175
General Discussion / Re: bter hacked and lost 50m nxt
« on: August 15, 2014, 02:06:13 pm »
This is good news, may trigger a NxT sell off, and BTSX will take the #1 market cap spot for p2p asset market.

Though I wonder what is our policy if something like this happens? ie. if 1 billion BTSX stolen from bter, do we rollback or not rollback?


NO ROLLBACKS!


1) Even in this instance the flaw was not with NXT
2) From the of theft to the time of rollback there will be thousands of transactions that'll either have to be applied to the fork or lost.


It would be a nightmare.

But that would be a small price to pay? in order to not let a hacker control 25% of BTSX. The thousands of reversed transactions can be sorted out afterwards, and fully compensated by the exchange. This would be the "moral" choice I believe.

I think they only control 5%. I would have dumped a truck myself but bter not accepting deposits obv nor cryptsy it seems.

Very good for BTSX obv.

176
General Discussion / BitShares X at no. 5 on coinmarketcap
« on: August 15, 2014, 11:56:21 am »
Nice to wake up and see BTSX in the the top 5!  :D


1. Bitcoin
2. Litecoin
3. Ripple
4. NXT
5. BitSharesX


177
General Discussion / Re: BTSX on coinport.com exchange
« on: August 15, 2014, 12:57:27 am »
 +5%

http://www.coindesk.com/new-hong-kong-bitcoin-exchange-offers-customers-extreme-transparency-measures/

Quote
A new Hong Kong-based exchange is offering its customers unprecedented transparency mechanisms, including automatic proof-of-reserves tests, in a bid to shake up the cryptocurrency exchange sector.

Cool. they're very new, tiny volumes.

But BTSX is one of only 9 they offer. Nice.

178
General Discussion / Re: DACSunlimited - Sunrise!
« on: August 15, 2014, 12:39:54 am »
Liking the new Dacsunlimited website  +5%

179
General Discussion / Re: FDIC for BitUSD
« on: August 14, 2014, 10:43:05 pm »
Quote
BTSX description from detractor, NXT/Bitcoin supporters etc.

Unlike other digital currencies or DAC's that have either no inflation like NXT or defined limited inflation like Bitcoin. BTSX has the ability to print new money when required just like the Federal Reserve & the other central banks we all know and love! But unlike central banks which only create a little bit of inflation, BTSX can create a lot all at once! So in a 50% flash crash for example, where you've already lost 50% of the value of your BTSX, we could devalue you by up to a further 25%! Won't that be a fun few hours to remember! But don't worry about the smart money & professional traders because a minority can hedge themselves and the rest will just sell very early on in a crash leaving the regular guys like you holding the bag when there's a problem. It's just like a real economy! Welcome to BTSX - The future of money!

I could see this being posted against nearly every positive sentiment for Bitshares on other forums, very bad for PR reasons along with the ideology.
On second thought BitUSD must be stable to be widely used for payment by customers, shops etc. Today payment in BTC is exchanged into USD by shops. BitUSD could be cheaper, hopefully and probably many user will not care about BTSX if  1their BitUSD = always 1USD.

Forex is a bigger market. Focus on replacing Forex.
Forex is for sure lucrative market. Forex traders count every pip in EUR/USD on some platforms even 1/2 pip.
If I am not badly wrong, the stability of BitUSD/USD is a key factor.

I'm personally quite comfortable with the risks as outlined by BM in his 'worst case in practice' example, I also agree with providing the most BitUSD stable peg possible & hedging is possible. I'm just always marketing focused though & the above is bad.

I noticed BM wrote this - 

If issuance starts to get too high (diluting the shareholders beyond 2B XTS) then that means delegates need to burn more and charge higher transaction fees to cover the risk.  The system can still earn a profit, the shareholders just have to choose to "save in advance" or "dilute as necessary".


What about marketing the potential debasement as temporary? We re-direct fees from burning into a fund that aims to get to 'X' size that will be able to serve that purpose. I think no dividends for a while is more marketable that unexpected dilution.

180

(I think Stellars only hope is to pretend (Scam) they have given away half a billion more but don't put them on the market or really crush the level of sharedrop they were originally intending.)

Stellar's CAP is holding up well but their price and more importantly their 24 hour $ traded volume is constantly falling. This is inconsistent with having nearly double the amount of stellar in circulation as last week imo.

I think the crushed sharedrop plus the combination of an invite system that is applied by some discretionary geographic/demographic criteria makes it very hard for you to track where all the new Stellar is going.

So I think CMC is getting a feed that Stellar is releasing more airdrops to the market (which raises their CAP) but not all these new stellar are actually being released or circulated imo. Time will tell.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 59