I believe everyone has been paid, all balances report 0 right now.

Quote from: RejectKid on November 12, 2013, 02:16:23 am

Quote from: NineLives on November 12, 2013, 02:13:28 am

Quote from: RejectKid on November 12, 2013, 02:08:39 am

Quote from: NineLives on November 12, 2013, 02:03:19 am

Thus far on my servers:

lol...holy God....I'll never get enough shares!!!  how you have so much stuff!?!?!?!

I managing many servers for a living

so does this mean the people your "serving" (pun intended) are now getting less than expected power/use/however you want to measure

Kind of yes and no.  These selected servers are wayyyyyyyy over powered for what it does.  No way will I allow them to not do its job or I don't get paid..
PS.  I own all of them BTW.

Thus far on my servers:

Quote from: RejectKid on November 10, 2013, 02:41:48 pm

Quote from: digitalindustry on November 10, 2013, 02:31:19 pm

Didn't reddit censor RT news "because they are Kremlin" ?

Never used reddit , probably won't if they are censor STASI ?

Can anyone explain to me what reddit is ? And why it matters ?

Say, more than,  say, this forum right here . .

Forums are nice but I feel like reddit is much more streamlined way of getting information faster.  All in one place.  Not sure about what you mean with the cesoring

this:

http://rt.com/news/rt-reddit-ban-kremlin-261/



The reason RT.com was banned on Reddit’s /r/news section may not be spam or vote manipulation, as was stated officially, but “simply because it’s Kremlin.” This was revealed by a user from his discussion with one of the subreddit’s moderators.

RT.com was banned from /r/news this Thursday on accusations of “spam and vote manipulation”, with no evidence of the violations being presented by the moderators, who said that this information was only for “internal” use. 



censoring.

Quote from: RejectKid on November 10, 2013, 02:32:01 pm

Quote from: bytemaster on November 10, 2013, 02:24:23 pm

Quote from: RejectKid on November 10, 2013, 02:19:04 pm

Quote from: bitbully on November 10, 2013, 02:17:08 pm

Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.

early bird gets worm

At the rate we were going 50% of the money supply would have been mined out in the first 2 weeks...  not only is this bad for late comers, it was bad for Invictus because our mining strategy was based upon a longer mining window.  Perhaps that is selfish, but Invictus is ultimately the one providing backing to ProtoShares.     THe chain was operating outside of spec, this is a bug fix.

Ah gotcha.  well thats alright with me.  I'm just excited to be part of a new "type" of coin all the different altcoins have some potential but ultimately I dont see them being better than the original of that "type" of coin.  so the introduction of SHA512 to the mix is cool to me, and then can't wait for the bitshare...merger, changeover, w/e you wanna call it.  I think thats supposed to be in Jan of 2014?

BitShares will come as soon as we can, but we are not going to rush it because there is too much on the line.   Keyhotee ID launches Jan 01.  BitShares beta will probably be closer to march unless I can get some good devs to join the team!  The point of ProtoShares was to bootstram the community and give everyone an interest in the success of BitShares

Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.

I am moving the pool to 192.241.150.158 as part of this transition... so I can clone/scale as necessary.   

The pool machine was being overloaded anyway, please take some time to update your miner scripts to point at the new pool location.