It's the reasoning for CNX leaving that is dumb... They say there is no money available for development because of the anit-dilution (chinese) crowd. Yet CNX hasn't even put forth a proposal for anything (MAS, Bonds, Rate Limited Transactions).
This is what I dislike as well.
Isn't @abit working on Rate Limited Transactions? And if I remember correctly, @bytemaster did propose a bond market in some detail. But if you were paying attention, you would know the anti-dilutionists are not interested in funding new features. Given that, do you really think MAS would have a remote chance of getting funded?
I don't understand the people who keep saying bytemaster is "moving on". Fact is, he said he's not going anywhere. He still owns a large stake in BTS and will continue to support it, make sure it keeps running smoothly, be a resource for businesses building atop BTS, etc.
But beyond that, there's no way for him to do any meaningful development work on BTS at this time. The mandate at this point is for feature stability. So cut the crap, people. Especially you, @lil_jay890, you little nattering nabob of negativity. How depressing it must be to go through life being you.
If you don't like what I post then put me on ignore or don't follow. I doubt you will quit following though. But I do find it pretty ironic that you,
@tbone, who constantly cuts down other forum members is saying how depressing it must be for me to go through life. You seem like one of those people that needs to put others down in order to validate yourself. Whatever though...
If you listened to the mumble and read posts by CNX members, they said it is impossible to get funding yet they have never even introduced one proposal other than the stealth thing (which ironically doesn't work). The reasoning is bullshit. All they do is dance around the question when asked or give some stupid reason like it takes too many resources to write a proposal. News Flash, who the hell is going to write a proposal if the creators of the system don't find it worth while??!
Bitshares is far from a feature freeze point. It doesn't even have all the things that were originally promised when 2.0 was announced last June. People would be willing to pay for a bond market or maker taker, but there is nothing to vote on. Then they go and fork (with no sharedrop) their own chain and blame it on the shareholders for being stingy.
Also abit is no longer working on the transaction thing because Jakub disappeared and he has no access to the funds.
There are good people here who do care about and do good work for bitshares. Stan and BM consistently say they will do whats best for bitshares but the actions that CNX has taken have been contrary to that.
Show Posts
