Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I've been trying to do this, and I keep getting:If your using 0.9.0 try setting the collateral to a number without a decimal place. I was getting the same error and this helped. Its a bug due to recent changes.
Invalid asset amount (35005)
Does this look familiar?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15851.msg203637.html#msg203637
getStackTrace@app.js:35:5176
○ request@app.js:45:8571
○ market_submit_short@app.js:46:7953
○ post_short@app.js:43:47902
○ app.js:43:46465
○ confirm_order@app.js:43:46529
○ confirm_order@app.js:36:27294
○ app.js:10:7986
○ e@app.js:10:14415
○ $eval@app.js:6:83428
○ $apply@app.js:6:83659
○ app.js:10:14472
○ dispatch@app.js:3:14478
○ handle@app.js:3:11253
35005 invalid_asset_amount: invalid asset amount
{"share_string":"430068.550050000020","max_rhs_size":5}
bitshares asset_record.cpp:93 bts::blockchain::asset_record::share_string_to_satoshi
{"share_string":"430068.550050000020","precision":100000}
bitshares asset_record.cpp:109 bts::blockchain::asset_record::share_string_to_satoshi
{"amount":"430068.550050000020"}
bitshares asset_record.cpp:114 bts::blockchain::asset_record::asset_from_string
{"amount":"430068.550050000020","symbol":"BTS"}
bitshares chain_interface.cpp:241 bts::blockchain::chain_interface::to_ugly_asset
{"from_account_name":"mattjohnson","real_quantity_xts":"430068.550050000020","quote_symbol":"USD","apr":"0.100000000000","collateral_symbol":"BTS","price_limit":"0.004424778761","sign":true}
bitshares wallet.cpp:3610 bts::wallet::wallet::submit_short
{}
bitshares common_api_client.cpp:5347 bts::rpc_stubs::common_api_client::wallet_market_submit_short
IMO the fact that I haven't been voted out yet is troubling. Maybe I should just turn them off and allow lots of blocks to be missed? It'd save me $80/mo since I don't use that vps for anything else anymore...
This new round of community is going to really turn BTS around.
Toast was the best asset BitShares had and I'd assume he still looks out for it. A couple of 100% delegates will not make any noticeable difference financially, but if those funds were properly directed by Toast then perhaps the funds would have made a noticeable positive difference.
Given that Toast was the best asset of BitShares that is public facing, being all quick to remove all his remaining interest in the project is probably not in the interest of BitShares. lol.
Plus as far as I know this funds are redirected to other severely underpaid core developers...
I can see a ton of other delegates that I will vote out before toast's, but hey if you disagree it is you vote....break your head and this project.
And good luck!
It isn't completely risk free because someone can issue another interfering order at the same time, but the basic process is this:
Check that there are no current expired orders, no bids high above the feed, and check the interest rate and price limit for any current shorts. Create a short order in the gap between highest bid and lowest ask and click short, but don't confirm it yet. Create a matching buy order to buy up all of your short, but don't submit it yet either. Double check the feed and order books to make sure your orders will currently be matched with each other, and then quickly confirm both orders so they make it into the same block. Assuming no one else submits an order in the same block that crosses over your order price, they'll match and you can use the BitAsset from your new short to cover your old short, effectively recollateralizing and extending the expiration to 30 days.
The merge-related dilution and the current inflationary aspect of BTS are two things I never signed up for, and it would be best if we returned to making BTS a purely deflationary crypto from this point forward.
I generally agree with the desire to make BTS a success without inflation and believe I have found a way.
.......?!?
(Isn't it nice having BM back on the forums everyone?)
