Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 79
106
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 20, 2018, 08:51:14 am »
this is a poll with 2 worker proposals, not a budget based worker proposal.

here the essential point is which WP get more voting power, not whether the WP become active.

107
General Discussion / Re: Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 04:00:40 am »
the Bitshares network is so bad in the past several days, always cost several mins to open a page!

what cause this? API servers are degraded? GUI bugs?
check how many accounts exist in your wallet.
if there are many strange account, it's a bug of GUI which I have met several days ago, it consider any accounts with the same address as your account, and subscribe too many data from api server.

thanks, yes it is this issue, I haven't seen the strange accounts but everything is well when I switch to my another wallet...

108
General Discussion / Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 03:26:47 am »
the Bitshares network is so bad in the past several days, always cost several mins to open a page!

what cause this? API servers are degraded? GUI bugs?


109
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 19, 2018, 02:22:08 pm »
The POLL is NO CONSENSUS.

You are BREAKING ALL RULES AS WITNESS !!!!!!

You have no right to change MSSR without creating a worker which will get voted in.

I will make sure that all witnesses which will change MSSR without a REAL community consensus will lose their voters.

he is talking about the on-chain poll

I know the NO BSIP42 is a clear signal to stop manipulation and that people want the margin to get eaten.What he is doing now is not changing price feed and lowering the MSSR back to 105% so margins won't be eaten anymore.
Also he is the only bigger proxy voting for BSIP41 so i doubt this is real consensus.

margin call orders are there at the top for long time, if bitCNY holders want to eat, they had done, if they won't, no need always let the margin call orders press the price and create high bitCNY premium.

bitcrab has only about 30M voting power, everyone can know whether I am the only big proxy to support bsip41.

110
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 19, 2018, 09:40:16 am »
as in the Poll of bsip41 - worker proposals  1.14.144 and 1.14.155, far more voting power support to implement bsip41, gdex-witness plan to feed 1.05 as MSSR for bitCNY in 2 days.

bsip41: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

111
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 19, 2018, 08:02:34 am »
I will support reduce MSSR to 105% even 102% if the  feed price are reliable.
but in fact many witness still given unreasonable feed price after bsip42 have been voted out for many days.
and most of the proxies are connive these witness,
without a reliable feed price, I don't know what's the meaning to talk about MSSR.

if you support it I hope you can vote.

how to ensure the balance of demand and supply on bitCNY will be a long lasting topic, I understand that bsip42 has big flaws so many people hate it,  but how about dynamic MCR? I can say nothing if this is also refused.

anyway, let's do not discuss this topic on this thread, reducing MSSR to 105% for bitCNY is an old suggestion even before bsip42(so it has a bsip#41), as now bitCNY return to high premium and serious shortage again. in this status I think bsip41 is what we have most consensus. at least it can help to reduce the bitCNY premium without doing harm.


112
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 01:28:24 pm »
as the title tell.

With real price feed?

this is an independent suggestion, irrelevant to how price is fed.
it's meaningless if the witness still give random feed price instead of real market price.

I just mean this poll voting does not cover that topic, actually there is another poll - the no bsip42 poll cover whether the witnesses should feed market price.

BTW, currently the ecosystem suffer bitCNY shortage and high premium mostly.

113
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 12:37:30 pm »
Forum polls are easily manipulated, stop using them - use the worker proposal voting mechanism instead or ask the committee directly to debate the idea.

I really don't see how this is beneficial, it comes off as pandering to bad debt holders.

please check worker proposals 1.14.144 and 1.14.145

and the drafted bsip: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

114
I am sorry that I made a mistake.

I created 2 worker proposals - 1.14.144 and 1.14.145 for the poll of BSIP41- reduce MSSR from 1.1 to 1.05, but I wrongly put this thread at the link.

the actual BSIP41 link: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

the BSIP41 discussion thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27596.0

115
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 05:57:01 am »
as the title tell.

With real price feed?

this is an independent suggestion, irrelevant to how price is fed.

116
General Discussion / how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 04:21:34 am »
please check worker proposals 1.14.144 and 1.14.145

and the drafted bsip: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

117
屯bitCNY的大户怎么可能喜欢负反馈呢?

bitCNY供应不足不是吗?我就是要你不足啊,那样我手里的bitCNY才更值钱啊。

爆仓单越来越多不是吗?好啊,那样我才能吃到更多便宜货啊。

推广bitCNY?做支付?这是什么鬼,who cares?

118
MCR 应该是 1.75 还是 1.4 是另外一个问题了
这里讨论的在参与抵押的BTS不变的情况下,临时降低MCR是否对改善供需关系有线性或者比较显著的帮助。
在调高喂价期间,除了那些贴线抵押的人,其他高抵押的用户会不会也跟着喂价调高借款?
这个最直接的是可以分析区块链数据,我个人是不会这样,如果需要借更多的钱可以直接多借没必要等降低MCR,何况这个调节还是临时的随时可能加回来。

首先,在同样的风险度下(这里风险度定义为债仓抵押率与MCR的距离),更低的MCR意味着可抵押借出来的bitCNY肯定是增多了。
同等量的BTS,1.9倍抵押和1.6倍抵押能产生的bitCNY数量肯定是不同的。
各人风格不同,有你这样的,也有拼命贴线的,我觉得都无所谓,但只要“可以抵押借出来”的增多了,就肯定有人会借,会增大供应量。
至于有人喜欢高风险借出,我觉得也无所谓,爱冒风险是交易者自己的事儿,只要从系统角度讲没增大系统风险就好。而只要喂价保持市场价,基本保证随爆随吃,系统风险就是可控的。
加回来要等溢价消失乃至变成折价才会加回来。


119
另外我仍然认为降低MCR并不能改善供需,要靠降低MCR才能增加出来的 bitCNY,这些债仓实际上在爆仓边缘,他们正是bitCNY最强的需求,怎么可能指望他们增加需求给别人使用。

这句话问题很大。
首先,降低MCR增加的bitCNY是整体上的,怎么一定是来自“爆仓边缘”的债仓呢?
一个用户要求自己抵押率不能低于3,那么当MCR=1.75时一个抵押率为3的债仓到了MCR=1.4时,抵押率变成了3.75,他再多借出一些,让抵押率再变为3,难道也是在爆仓边缘吗?
bsip42虽然问题很大,但至少证明了通过负反馈调节供需是有效的,对此不应该无视。
不知道你这里抵押率是怎么定义的,我理解的是价值3块钱的BTS,借出1个bitCNY。如果BTS价格不变,把MCR从1.75调到1.4对抵押率没影响仍然是3,他不会多借出bitCNY。
本质上bitCNY供应量肯定是随着BTS价格下降减少,非要通过调整MSR逆转这个趋势那也只是一时不可能长久。
另外BSIP42期间,调高喂价相当于降低MCR,同时降低了MSSR。
改善bitCNY溢价的直接原因是MSSR降低到0,甚至是负的了,爆仓单卖价和实际价格持平甚至还高,这同时也是导致爆仓单风险累积的原因。
降低MCR到底有什么直接影响并没有有效的数据证明。

哦,我说错了,是距离爆仓点远了,不是抵押率高了。
不是要逆转这个趋势,而是在风控可及的范围内尽量满足市场需要,如果MCR=1.4风险程度也可以接受,那就没必要再bitCNY已经溢价很多的情况下继续坚持1.75的MCR,1.75这个数字也只是BM拍脑袋得来的。
降低MCR的直接作用:1.原本要爆仓的单子现在不爆了,直接减少卖压。2.供应会上升。
没有理由说只是MSSR在改变溢价。



120
另外我仍然认为降低MCR并不能改善供需,要靠降低MCR才能增加出来的 bitCNY,这些债仓实际上在爆仓边缘,他们正是bitCNY最强的需求,怎么可能指望他们增加需求给别人使用。

这句话问题很大。
首先,降低MCR增加的bitCNY是整体上的,怎么一定是来自“爆仓边缘”的债仓呢?
一个用户要求自己抵押率不能低于3,那么当MCR=1.75时一个抵押率为3的债仓到了MCR=1.4时,抵押率变成了3.75,他再多借出一些,让抵押率再变为3,难道也是在爆仓边缘吗?
bsip42虽然问题很大,但至少证明了通过负反馈调节供需是有效的,对此不应该无视。

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 79