151
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Marketing: Full time Marketing team
« on: April 30, 2020, 03:55:55 am »
Support!
Better to also publish an English version.
Better to also publish an English version.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
we have 4 popular MPA tokens
let the different settings show us what works best
USDT / bitasset marketsCode: [Select]--seller-------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1599329 56.69998
1.2.1700383 1.71713Code: [Select]--buyer--------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1599329 82.87065
1.2.1150126 42.68992
1.2.1700686 21.39058
1.2.1700383 21.31491
Reward data for 2020-04-24
(data generated with Ruby 2.6.5p114 (2019-10-01 revision 67812), script revision 6486918)
Total 7673.44788 BTS
BTC / bitasset marketsCode: [Select]--seller-------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1610646 6.96942
1.2.1214711 0.01880Code: [Select]--buyer--------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1610646 33.58069
1.2.1209453 29.89737
1.2.1214711 0.02039
USDT / bitasset marketsCode: [Select]--seller-------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1599329 1.16591Code: [Select]--buyer--------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1700383 5.80994
1.2.1599329 2.89188
ETH / bitasset marketsCode: [Select]--seller-------------------------reward(BTS)-
Code: [Select]--buyer--------------------------reward(BTS)-
EOS / bitasset marketsCode: [Select]--seller-------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1610085 9.25363Code: [Select]--buyer--------------------------reward(BTS)-
1.2.1610085 1883.47051
1.2.973383 0.56082
Now this is the tricky part: Stablecoin as represents peg/equivalent to its fiat brother (in terms of legal definitions around globe) and is backed by collateral (in our case BTS on-chain); -> To maintain legal around currency with no owner (apart from current committee members), we have to:
a) restore the PEG before me and Stefan make sure CMC is getting back listed
or
b) Exclude both bitCNY and bitUSD from CMC.
Even CMC Phase 2 demands legal paperwork and has plenty of requirement where with current parameters of those 2 stablecoins we are eligible as fraudcoin. Not saying we are fraud/scam - but reason to prevent "short-attack" from currency that doesn't even report currently its volume is a bit off.
Please reconsider future and reputation of entire blockchain. We still don't have:
1) basic development and legal (apart from what Move does in it's own limits)
2) new dapps/service to offer
3) new committee-account issued replacements for bitUSD and bitCNY
but we do have:
1) empty dex
2) empty gateways (no businesses around)
3) broken smartcoins that nobody new will use
We need some agreement and solution fast, now it's been 9 months and its not "temporary" anymore.
Chee®s
You care now because somebody invested 5.000.000 collateral who sucked of other peoples debt kicking out many debt holders from biteur and is now the lowest CR on biteur and who has a clear relationship with you.
Taking other peoples debt and kicking them out of debt is not bringing any supply.
You want more supply for biteur.No problem sell your BTS and you will see how quickly it will get eaten.
But instead you take over the debt positions for pure self benefit and nothing more bringing nothing to biteur.
The only think you do is reducing the amount of debt holders getting biteur debt more centralized.
That's all you can do
Why did you open your company in Singapore which is a global financial hub ,crypto friendly and regulated country and vote at the same time to have legal representative for westerns in Slovenia which is the opposite?
Is this not a legit question on your voting and support behavior?
Why don't you once in your life ask western members what they want when you decide to vote on matters which mainly effects them or at least apply the same standards you used for your own company and chinese community.
Remember your feed bsip which should be only applied to bitcny based on consenus and was later added to bitusd by you with no consent making western mad ?
Seems you want to dictate them your point of view instead letting them go the route the western community wants to go.
My reading is that the request by DL is that we transition to non-faked price feeds on bitUSD.
I support this - Abit has flagged up the primary challenge. It could be done via a phased transition to real price feed over a period of X weeks?
That would give time for big debt holders to shift their positions over and also maybe create some volatility / speculation opportunities in the market if people expect some improvement in price during the period.
Correct - I'm definitely not insane and definitely its not language barrier problem, thanks.
Yeah, idea is
step 1) that Chinese have X amount of weeks to move/close their positions to CNY under the current fixed feeds.
step 2) we restore original feeds and settings on bitUSD and recreate normal positions/markets
Chee®s