Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 129
166
@bitcrab why don't you open your company in cambodia or mongolia ...... ?
Any worse country you want to have bitshares legal for western users ?

Chinese even know where Slovenia is ?Or their history of rule of law ?

stupid and arrogant guy, I really do not understand why @alt set you as proxy.

167
Now, since my legal structuring on my own hand will help these missing processes and abilities to show and use stablecoins in the future, I request/ask on behalf of West that bitUSD as representation of western token and fiat stablecoin (where China/Asia has complete zero legal ability to do anything with it publicly or outside China) for 2nd chance that we westerners do it correct way.

If positions of Chinese holders are issue here, they would just need to spend some time on closing them and moving to bitCNY and it would be very acceptable process - since we don't want to damage anyone but just to restore health to certain parts of blockchain that are becoming very important in real world (future cashless society and importance of stablecoins).

I agree to remove BSIP76 from bitUSD and keep BAIP2, would like to try to lobby China community on this, although it is not easy.
we need to find a roadmap to do this to minimize the hurting to the debt position holders.

168
@bitcrab: please don't try to play with the parameters of bitEUR. Leave it to the westerns. Thanks.

Where are the Westerns? what have they done with bitEUR? how much bitEUR have they supplied? have they tried to connected bitEUR with EURO? do they really care the business development of bitEUR?

169
The time we locked the feed price is too long,  the first thing what we should do is remove the BSIP76 from bitusd!

surely this is another choice at this moment.

How many users support this and how many are against this?

170
Is there any chance to push this for BitUSD as well ? There is some focus from different large world entities on stablecoins (due to covid-19 epidemic) and some members around here even know which entities I'm talking about. Their focus is in on-chain collateral stablecoins because they are only truly decentralized and restoring to BitUSD real value through BAIP2 would be very important.

Please consider question/suggestion slowly and reach me if you need any more specific info.

Chee®s

actually BAIP2 and also BSIP76 are already applied on bitUSD and bitCNY.

171
bitEUR now suffer great suppression in supply and liquidity by force settlement.

To apply BAIP2(https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0002.md) on bitEUR will lessen the suppression in supply and liquidity and will activate the ecology of bitEUR.

Two poll workers have been created:

1.14.257   Poll-BAIP2-Reform on bitEUR feed price mechanism

1.14.258   Poll-BAIP2-Do Not Reform on bitEUR feed price mechanism

BAIP2 is approved to apply on bitEUR if worker 1.14.257 get higher voting power than 1.14.258 and also 1.14.236 BAIP-Threshold.

Please vote according to your opinion.


172
General Discussion / Re: @CN-Vote
« on: April 14, 2020, 05:14:52 am »
Worst part is you made fox claim of getting bitassets centralized and unpredictable true.
Committee now in full control of cn-vote/bitcrab/jademont

You just scared off majority of western community to invest in any bitassets or leave bitshares.

Is that the growth for bitshares you are looking for ?


I hope you are able to see and admit these negative effects and change your voting behavior accordingly

DPoS means voting power always speak.

it's not good to just call it "centralization" when voting power do not agree with you.

surely the leaving of the majority of western community is not I want to see, but that's not the most important factor.

let me adopt the example that I have adopted several times, In August 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to remove the dollar peg to gold, the Bretton Woods System collapsed.

surely this is not Europe want to see, but it's US has to do.

there is big culture difference between China and the Western world, but please do not follow the "autocracy and democracy" dualism to understand the world. China is open to the whole world, but we have our own principles.

I'd like to help to push "ES node and infrastructure and CMC and feixiaohao" thing after a fully understanding on this thing.


173
建议在统计计算奖励的时候把单个交易对的交易量也作为一个因素考虑进去。

这个应该可以在实际深度这个地方做文章。

可以把交易对组里的交易对按当天交易量分档,每档分配一个交易量因子,比如:
A档 125万BTS以上        交易量因子 = 1.331
B档 25万以上125万以下 交易量因子 = 1.21
C档 5万以上25万以下     交易量因子 = 1.1   
D档 1万以上5万以下      交易量因子 = 1

原来计算的公式是;
* 每一档内,
  如果合计深度达不到目标深度,奖励额 = 基准奖励 * 实际深度 / 目标深度
  (也就是说,如果深度不足,奖励按比例减少)
  如果合计深度达到目标深度,奖励额 = 基准奖励(也就是说封顶,超过不多奖)

现在增加 调整深度 = 实际深度*交易量因子
而奖励额 = 基准奖励*调整深度/目标深度

调整深度按所在交易对的交易量对实际深度进行了调整,并且取代了实际深度在公式中的位置。

也就是说,在一个主流币/BTS交易对组里,提供同样的深度,在交易量100万BTS的交易对里比在交易量20万BTS的交易对里多拿10%的奖励。

这样有限度地鼓励了更多成交,也没有用力过猛。

相信当4.0上线之后,这样的改动会有效推高系统收入。

174
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy:B-DEX
« on: April 10, 2020, 08:06:47 am »
will give an answer on several aspects in this weekend.

1.Chinese committee members and cn-vote
Yes, Chinese members constitute the majority of committee.

not all Chinese committee members represent cn-vote, actually only kang8 and zhouxiaobao-2010 are proxies of cn-vote, abit, jademont, btsai and me are neutral.

Yes, Chinese committee members communicate more between each other than with others because of sharing the same culture, language, timezone, etc. but this does not mean we decide things by ourselves without discussing with other members.

operations like claiming bitCNY fee and buying back BTS are daily operations, in my view it's important to do this in high efficiency, with informing all the committee members.

I don't know what deal cn-vote has made with BEOS, but I don't think that's a big problem, in my view BEOS is even healthier than some whales in voting.


2. core prelude worker

yes, sometime before China community terminate the old core worker. because:

1. in the bear market core team always sell BTS to press price.
2. China community do not feel what the core team is building is what they really need.

but even with the help of ZB, now the refund400K get only 5.8 billion voting power, too high? don't you think it's reasonable for a worker to get higher voting power to get fund?

in recent past, I feel it's necessary to reorganize the core team work and suggest to the community, DL did a lot coordination work on this, he talked to each team member, he discussed with all big voters, China community also has discussed on this, finally the consensus is the core prelude worker, and a subsequent main worker which is still in plan, with P2P Lending as the main new feature.

the core prelude worker is for 4.0 launch with some added charging features. which is greatly needed at this moment.

for the force settlement fee, suppose we set bitCNY force settlement fee as 1%, if one day 1M BTS settled, system will get 10K BTS as fee, I don't know why you always talk about $5/day.

maybe you dislike this worker, up to you, but this worker really come out after long time discussion, it get great support in China community.

3.picture of Bitshares.

what I describe below is a picture of Bitshares in my brain, it is not drafted by myself, but by many people, it is not definitely the future of BTS, it need to go across voting and implementation to realization.

redefinition of smartcoin:

the core flaw of the initial smartcoin design is that it always lead to death spiral, which make debt position owners always pay a lot for the peg of smartcoin, and if always make down trend of BTS price.

BSIP76 and BAIP2 redefined smartcoin to an updated derivative of BTS, the updated bitCNY is a derivative that not linked to the market price of BTS, but to a function of market price of BTS, exactly speaking, bitCNY ~ max(0.22, MA24 of BTS, real time price of BTS).

the updated bitCNY do not focus on the real time pegging to CNY, however,it peg to CNY sometime and peg off other time, and the pre condition is that BTS price go and stably keep above 0.22CNY, this change removed the death spiral but make bitCNY a financial tool for risk hedge,arbitrage and speculation.

DEX income supported token
the core prelude worker add several new features of charging, the accumulated fee will be used to buy back BTS to support BTS price.

trading contest/order mining is another important feature of current BTS, market making is one important feature of exchange, trading contest is to encourage market making, and it will finally lead to higher system income.

P2P Lending

it will be the most important feature in the subsequent main core worker, it will enable the leverage trading between any assets.


 







175
I am against that. Because who is to decide who gets excluded and who doesn't? That's just another way to manipulate the votes.

right,another problem is how to exclude if the goal account switch to another account? say, beos switch from "beos" to "beos-pro", can the system always exclude it?

176
Also bitcrab please stop your manipulative games it's not working on me.

perhaps you do not understand, but that's the way bitCNY is on, it is not a decision made by any single person, but by the whole China community.

we just updated one BTS derivative design, initially it based on the real time BTS price, now it base on one function of BTS price.

calm down, buddy, I'd like to see how you catch the big money flood which will accure soon because of negative interest.

177
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 31, 2020, 03:13:59 am »
It's an identical problem - when faced with an unacceptable situation the outcome has been to repeatedly provide fake numbers.

Trust me when I say nobody believes China has solved the problem, they're simply lying about the figures, exactly like how BSIP76 proponents have behaved with bitCNY (provide fake numbers to escape an undesirable reality). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llgCCybOZoA

Why does my location matter? No courts are open; if I was in china would you be demanding my incarceration? Sad. I may or may not currently reside in the fully independent nation state of Taiwan.

interesting, why shall I trust you, not my eyes?

we just updated the design of bitCNY, in old times bitCNY is a derivative that base on BTS real time price. now it is a derivative that base on one function of BTS price.

surely this change hurt bitCNY holders, but it solve the death spiral and benefit BTS future. the decision is made mainly by China community, include most of the bitCNY holders.

178
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 30, 2020, 03:19:51 am »
In August 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to remove the dollar peg to gold, the Bretton Woods System collapsed.

You surely can say that US cheated the whole world, but the point is, at that moment US has no other choice.

BTS also face similar problem, BTS need first to survive, and then can seek more.

BitAssets are not created as a killer to BTS.
BS. Global settlement would have nullified this bad debt issue & we'd likely have recovered by this point.

BitAssets weren't created to defraud the bitshares community, yet here we are - the committee owned bitassets now permanently disgraced scamcoins.

Shame on you for fundamentally destroying the integrity of bitassets permanently.

On the upside, at least we know now that china's lying about their covid figures since these bitCNY fixed feeds are seemingly fully acceptable to the CCP. Had you not led the bitassets to defraud the entire Bitshares community I might have taken the CN Covid figures at face value and not prepared as well as I did for this quarantine. Cheers mate 👍

if you want to discuss bitCNY issue, let's focus on it, covid figures is another irrelevant problem.

and it's clear that China has solved internal problems and is now helping the whole world. as a Chinese that live in Shanghai I am clear what happened here.

BTW, where do you come from?

179
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP76:Set bitCNY feed threshold
« on: March 29, 2020, 04:50:01 pm »
I do not want to explain more to the guys who just say others do not understand this and that, it's wasting time.

The best thing that could happen to bitshares is for you personally to end up in concrete box with bars after an anonymous report to state security and exchange commission.   And all your friends and associates locked up and fined as well. 

Please somebody, do us all a favor, and report this asshole:

CHINA http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/csrc_en/about/contact/
USA https://www.sec.gov/tcr
EU https://www.esma.europa.eu/whistleblowers-corner

If you report to SEC you may be eligible for up to 10% of any money recovered as a reward!

Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo.

just report it yourself, don't you like the reward?

the decision is made by community through voting, not by myself.

180
General Discussion / Re: Review of BAIP2
« on: March 29, 2020, 03:39:01 pm »
You PERSONALLY and all of your bullshit BSIPS and BAIPS related to making margin call impossible are what have ruined the architecture of the smartcoin ecosystem.

if you are too stupid to understand what is shorting attack/ death spiral, I don't know how to explain to you.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 129