871
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] - A bounty based smartcoin marketing campaign
« on: December 10, 2018, 06:46:13 am »
the point here is not "listing BTS in more CEX", but "open bitCNY/bitUSD markets in more CEX".
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
发展智能货币与发展其它生态不矛盾。发展生态的事情从来都没人拦着。蟹哥,本来市场就风云变幻,不可预测的影响因素很多,机制越简单越具有鲁棒性,无论是负反馈还是动态调整MCR,引入了动态变量,结果的不可预知性被不断放大。单纯调MSSR引起的变量最少,市场对于机制可以有明确的认识。
向交易所推广从来都不是妄想。
bsip42有固有缺陷,新版的负反馈方案见这里 https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27506.0
当然,现在的形势下,新版有没有机会获得足够支持来实施,是另外一个问题。
另外,在BTS目前这个市值情况下,锚定精准意义真的不大。
anyway, I think this is much better than just let global settlement happen.
Would you say this is an accurate way to rephrase your statement: "better to lose the peg via a nonconsensus hack than to lose the peg via a GS."
I'm pretty sure that I agree with that sentiment.
That makes it sound like it's worth looking in to a major protocol update which would soften the GS nuclear option in some way.
if you mix it all, it's more difficult to get consensus.
to help the ecosystem to grow, we can't relies on high risk market action.
again, to judge the risk, you shouldn't mix two thing togother: one is borrow CNY, the other is use CNY.
in fact there are no risk if you just borrow CNY without spent it.
the real risk depends on how you spend it.
if mainy CNY debt owner spent CNY to buy BTS, it's a high risk action, while if they trade CNY for fiat CNY, it's a low risk action.
we need to encourage more fund to help the ecosystem grow, not manipulation economy.
teaching them get profit from low risk market action, buy bitCNY with fiat CNY at price less then 1.0, sell at price high than 1.0.
It seems we kind of agree on the general direction so my suggestion would be to implement things in an incremental way.
To start:
Settlement offset as low as possible (would like it to even be 1% on par with all other bitassets)
Some kind of GS protection
and personally I think our first attempt to improve things should be to allow for variable MSSR according to circumstances.
you don't need to make things complex, don't need to mix all together especially bsip42.
personally I support 1,3,4, but not 2
Would rather this worker proposal go towards paying listing fee + some bonus bounty for the person who lobbied it. This is how you get listed, yep most exchanges are fake volume but nobody cares when it can bring new actual users to Bitshares. I'd support this with our vote with the above change^.
I would like to support the change too. How do you think @bitcrab ?
I didn't see any point to get profit from it, if you have you should do it.
As a trader I will never borrow a cent if you can make me margin call without price of BTS change, sometimes even when BTS price increase.
Imagine the national adjust the interest rate dynamic, totally free to increase or reduce, whatever if they have the logic or not.
The rate could increase today while decrease tomorrow.
would you still regard reduce rate as stimulate the economy? would you borrow more when you don't known if they will increase the rate again next second?
whatever adjust the feed price or MCR, the problem is a normal rational trader should not consider reduce MCR as they can borrow more safely.
In fact, it only affect to those risk short position which is very close or already margin call.
Do you wish to encourage them borrow more or decrease the debt ?
2.1和2.2部分,我不觉得这样喂溢价合适。如果有人觉得见证人操作喂价,他们也会认定操作溢价。没什么区别。反而这样会失去灵活性,如果这种方式最后发现不太合适。要修改,估计又需要等到下次分叉了。
关于mssr我建议动态调整,可以根据一定规则评估黑天鹅风险系数。风险系数大的时候mssr增加,鼓励搬砖吃爆仓单。风险系数小的时候mssr降低。
那你觉得怎样合适呢?
MSSR也搞动态的话感觉太复杂了。
喂的数据还是直接喂“价格”就行,只是算法调整,保留灵活性。
MSSR动态确实需要一些规则,复杂性会上升。目前来说就固定测试一些参数就可。105 102都可以测测看到底哪些适合。
I will not regard the price as 0.35 CNY when I known the witness can change the price back to 0.32 CNY at anytime.
so what's the point of increase the feed price to 0.35CNY? did it really increase the supply?