Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ticklebiscuit

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
46
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 10:47:37 pm »
You have that right. It comes down to what do we consider "the community". Is it just this forum? Just true believers in DAC technology?  Or all of crypto?

I think share drops to other coins is great if the devs think that will get them the support they need.

Point being while I feel pts has a use as being a prepackaged collection of believers I don't think anyone owes it anything. All I can do is promote a token I feel solves the current issue.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

So it comes down to community and you have great potential. But are you guys really making it count, working together and using eachothers skills as building blocks to the land of EPIC hall of fame sharedrop-worthiness? or betting on magic to fly in rainbows out of Invictus asses and make it so?  Instead of complaining about who gets more, work to prove who deserves more.  Right now as I see it, a few are doing well...alone or in very small isolated groups.  But it is going to take much more than that...and your competition is not waiting for the founders to figure this out.


47
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 10:21:24 pm »


Regardless of whether its 'fair' I hope there is no change now. For once I would like to see something NOT change. We seem to have taken the 'reimagine everything' motto a bit too literally.

That's an interesting argument. Let's not concern ourselves with what is fair. I for one will not be participating in another round of "Angel" investing coming from PLAY, if it ever needs one.
How can one unfairly give something away? We aren't entitled to anything.

If this sort of angry haggling is what any dev that wants to share drop to the community faces they likely won't. If I had a good idea for a DAC I'd do the 10% pts, maybe 10% AGS and spend the rest on dev and marketing talent.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Angelshares were used as a grant for funding the PLAY dac. There are millions of dollars that were donated at a very real risk to fund development. That kind of support should be valued just as highly as the network effect of BTS holders. BTS holders should not be getting 3 times the allocation in my opinion. The Pre Feb28 windfall was a huge gift. Why are the same people getting a larger share this time? It makes no sense! Not because of a contracted obligation but because this community should recognize those that gifted thousands of BTC to make PLAY possible. What part of that is so difficult to understand? If fairness doesn't interest you how about the basic principle of reciprocity?

The only argument I hear in opposition is once again to stop nagging and just be quiet. Which is an interesting argument. One that I will weigh when considering future support of this community.

What has the PTS/AGS community done that makes them deserve stake forever?  If they want to get sharedropped more, they need to unite and show why the PTS/AGS model deserves to remain.  Other than, of course, saying they made it possible.  Everyone else made it possible too by buying in. 

If you want sharedrops, work together as PTS/AGS and provide value above and beyond what everyone else does.  Work as a unit.  You have all had plenty of time to utilize each others skills to create something that would be truly EPIC and historically precedent-setting.  Something worthy of being sharedropped on for all eternity.

What have you done bit expect it without really showing you can create this precedent? Invictus has more than honored their end considering they are no longer invictus.  They have given you all more than 10% in every DAC they have made.

Now it is time to work for the respect of 3rd party devs.

Think of pts not as a coin but a simple share drop target people can buy and sell.

If someone thinks BTS is all that and a bag of chips? Great, balance your desire for a piece of future DACs with your belief in an existing one.

I always viewed PTS as a token that pays a dividend in the form of share drops. The devs in return get a community of folks chomping at the bit to test, discuss, host, evangelize, and generally do what everyone is doing now for BTS.

It was never about payback or respect for founders, etc. It is just a unique type of token that served a specific purpose. If a dev thought they had a killer idea they could buy cheap PTS and then promote their idea to build interest in a share drop and increase the price of PTS as people evaluated the DAC.

Or we can keep putting devs through the grinder while they negotiate percentages for weeks rather than working on the DAC.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Im looking for specifics. What do PTS/AGS give developers that other communities (like, say, doge) dont give better? Im not doubting talent or capability. Just asking for examples of what the AGS/PTS community give that is unique.  If it is an understanding of DACs that is fast fading and will not be around long.

48
DAC PLAY / Re: Do you find the BitShares PLAY allocation just?
« on: November 16, 2014, 08:25:32 pm »
Regardless of whether its 'fair' I hope there is no change now. For once I would like to see something NOT change. We seem to have taken the 'reimagine everything' motto a bit too literally.

That's an interesting argument. Let's not concern ourselves with what is fair. I for one will not be participating in another round of "Angel" investing coming from PLAY, if it ever needs one.
How can one unfairly give something away? We aren't entitled to anything.

If this sort of angry haggling is what any dev that wants to share drop to the community faces they likely won't. If I had a good idea for a DAC I'd do the 10% pts, maybe 10% AGS and spend the rest on dev and marketing talent.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Angelshares were used as a grant for funding the PLAY dac. There are millions of dollars that were donated at a very real risk to fund development. That kind of support should be valued just as highly as the network effect of BTS holders. BTS holders should not be getting 3 times the allocation in my opinion. The Pre Feb28 windfall was a huge gift. Why are the same people getting a larger share this time? It makes no sense! Not because of a contracted obligation but because this community should recognize those that gifted thousands of BTC to make PLAY possible. What part of that is so difficult to understand? If fairness doesn't interest you how about the basic principle of reciprocity?

The only argument I hear in opposition is once again to stop nagging and just be quiet. Which is an interesting argument. One that I will weigh when considering future support of this community.

What has the PTS/AGS community done that makes them deserve stake forever?  If they want to get sharedropped more, they need to unite and show why the PTS/AGS model deserves to remain.  Other than, of course, saying they made it possible.  Everyone else made it possible too by buying in. 

If you want sharedrops, work together as PTS/AGS and provide value above and beyond what everyone else does.  Work as a unit.  You have all had plenty of time to utilize each others skills to create something that would be truly EPIC and historically precedent-setting.  Something worthy of being sharedropped on for all eternity.

What have you done bit expect it without really showing you can create this precedent? Invictus has more than honored their end considering they are no longer invictus.  They have given you all more than 10% in every DAC they have made.

Now it is time to work for the respect of 3rd party devs. 

49
General Discussion / Re: transaction speed road map
« on: November 16, 2014, 08:08:43 pm »
Ive seen 10000tps ...i believe in the wiki.

50
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Vato For Full Paid Delegate
« on: November 14, 2014, 01:05:57 am »
Many people know I'm an BitShares enthusiast and that I like to contribute as much as possible.
Besides my normal activities I'd like to do more to grow our community and sharevalue.

I'm not a developer so I can't help on the technology part.
But there are 5 reasons I think it could be worth to participate as full paid delegate.
So I like to hear what the "greater community" has to say in that case, therefor you have the poll above.


[Draft]

5 Reasons You Should Vote Me for Delegate
1. I'll grow the BitShares ecosystem
  • This includes especially bountys for new applications.
    (I already stay in contact with some devs but it is very hard to convince them without money)

2. I'll grow the BitShares community
  • This includes especially promotion campaigns for users and devs in the D-A-CH regions.

3. I'll grow the BitAsset demand
  • All of the monthly income will be converted into BitAssets.
  • All bountys and promotions will be paid with BitAssets.

4. I'll strengthen the BitShares network
  • This includes especially donations for ongoing script, web and client developers but also seed-node operators.

5. I'll be an shining example of transparency
  • All activities and expenses will be shown on my blog.
So I will provide you those 5 extras to my standard activities like translations, my blog, social media activities and the well known monthly Delegates Report.
If you vote me for delegate I'll also get my own domain and webserver for the KettenBlog in 2015.
If you like what I stand for, then please vote for <placeholder>.

Where did you go when you left before?  Why did you leave? Why did you want to come back?

Answering these questions will get you more support if the reasons are good.

51
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: IT Delegate Proposal - backbone.riverhead
« on: November 14, 2014, 01:03:05 am »
What are the issues of legality when running delegates?
What are the legal issues behind receiving donations from delegates?

We need to pay lawyers to help us with this if there isnt a clear tyranny landscape...I mean laws on this.

52
General Discussion / Re: How legal are DACs around the world?
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:37:05 am »
All this talk will not keep people out of prison.  Action is needed.  We need a president put into office with cryptocurrency...oh....wait.   8)

53
General Discussion / Re: IRS can now seize any account for any reason.
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:33:31 am »
Conspiracy theorists. This is freedom!

54
General Discussion / Re: Approve my 100% pay rate delegate
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:04:03 pm »
Eat steak toast
And build bitmarket a porn DAC While you are at it.

55
The snapshot must be post November 5th, and post return of PTS from AGS fund...



Will people soon be dumping them?
I'd like to see people keep them.
I did buy some yesterday though!...

I disagree. Invictus' workers deserves to be able to eat stake every damn day and still have money left over for beer.  Let these guys afford steak and beer and then just watch the cool stuff they build!

56
Random Discussion / Re: What happens when you're the first black president?
« on: November 12, 2014, 09:00:27 am »
Racism is not the only thing driving hate of Obama. Some people don't like his policies or positions on issues. So there is some substantive disagreement. I'd say the racism represents a single digit (low double digit, at most) percentage of the people who don't like him.
Thank god for a sense of rationality.

57
Random Discussion / Re: What happens when you're the first black president?
« on: November 11, 2014, 08:48:20 pm »
Jae, I'm right there with you. Not a single thing you've said in this thread is wrong. There are plenty of racists who hate Obama (that has been proven actually). The country is better off now than it was in 2008 (much higher employment for one thing). A certain TV network lies. And Ted Cruz is a moron. Check, check, check, check.

Yet I also agree with the other posters that there is more going on. Neither Obama nor Cruz nor their parties are truly addressing the problems we need to have fixed.

In the end, the party labels and the regular pendulum swing between them in these elections is doing little to address the fact that we are using our planet's resources at a voraciously unsustainable pace and polluting much faster than the planet's ability to heal, that kids are being treated with drugs instead of nourished, while their schools cannot afford pencils, that the economy is run by big banks, agriculture is run by chemical companies, the middle class and upward mobility have nearly disappeared, and meanwhile we are spending trillions of dollars we don't have to prop up a house of cards...those are the things that Obama and Cruz don't even talk about. Because they understand it is the big financial elites that run the world. Presidents, Senators, and governments just work for them.

There are also plenty of racists who hate white people...leading with this argument is ridiculous.

58

+1 As a newbie myself it took me a few hours to figure it all out. Its extremely confusing and if 3rd parties start releasing share drops to PTS then it would hurt BTS in the long run.

Try to put yourself in the shoes of 3rd party DAC.
Would you do share drop percentage of your business to low value coin with small community  or would you shared drop to high value coin with big community?  For me answer is very simple from business point of view. Big community with a lot of developers will always be priority for any 3rd party DAC.

This makes sense until one realizes there are potentially thousands of chains with alight variations and that some chains may be chosen by a superDAC while others are not. Then it becomes apparent that sharedropping on different communities at the same time is a far better strategy than sharedropping everything on a huge superDAC like BTS alone.

59
General Discussion / Re: Can we Clone OmniBazaar?
« on: November 10, 2014, 03:45:23 pm »
No public tip of the hat and the cold shoulder.....bizzare.

People still don't get how competition in this market works.

Heh?

no acknowledgement for using Bitshares tech and underappreciation for all the people who would have been incentivized to make their project a success...

By far not all people...especially other devs.  Many of them understand and want to compete. Let this be the perfect case for keeping a neutral PTS and AGS alive and well so we can continue to get more DACs honoring social consensus online.

60
General Discussion / Re: OmniBazaar: social-consensus-rejecting BTS fork
« on: November 10, 2014, 03:42:37 pm »
This is the natural progression of the crypto world.  An innovation is created, builds a presence, a following, then follows the copy cats. This is standard and expected. People have the right to "do their thing" but as long as we make it very apparent that there is no connection, other than code, from us than we should be able to move past these type of trolls.

No...you simply serve to alienate the community and make us all look like greedy biscuits.  Instead say nothing anf help make a clone of it.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7