Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Felix

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
61
Its 2021:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply

Great... an enshrined constitution that stipulates an dilution rate strictly less than BTC's inflation rate would "tie our hands" and should be carefully considered, but from a marketing perspective there is a strong case.

You are changing almost all essential elements in the original consensus!!!
If the original consensus allows the dilution rate, I am sure that most holders did not buy btsx shares in the past! Particularly, the benefit caused by the future dilution will be not for minority shareholders, but only for delegates ! Now I cann't see at all  the meaning of decentralization. Your opinion is just the decision! right? That's the reason why some chinese are asking for the help of the authority to forbid btsx trades on BTC38!

62
Hard fork or dilution should be the taboo!
A taboo on hard forks results in a non-developing blockchain! .. your stuck in version 1.0!
and I have a feeling still don't understand what the dilution is good for ..

Our current situation is that btsx market hasn't been yet developed far well. Do you agree? And your proposed dilution will definitely lead to the falling  price of shares. One day, when the volume of bts market approaches  that of BTC, it might be reasonable to take the dilution into account. But now your idea does not consider  the benefit of shareholders at all.

63
You can vote for delegates that wont inflate for their salary.  If the market determines that the cost is not worth it, they will vote low cost delegates

why is there only the inflation in your head?  Hard fork or dilution should be the taboo!

64
这是我在英文区的发帖,大家要支持啊
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10816.0

65
OP: Wrong. Delegate positions are for talented individuals who can be trusted to increase the market cap more than they consume. If that is the case, then there is no problem. The only problem is with people's perceptions.

How decide the increased market cap quantitatively more than they consume?  Your idea is Ok but obviously lack of good operability!I think these rules are not clear!

66
BM,I warn you that your feckless decisions have already impaired a lot of stakeholders greatly and the market vigorously gives the result!  Why does people love BTC? Radically because the amount can not be manipulated by such financial organizations as U.S. Federal Reserve and our fortune cannot be diluted.  So in my view, any idea like hard fork or dilution is extremely stupid!
Code: [Select]
[x] compare BitShares with Bitcoin
[ ] get the difference of both

The essence is similar! For BitShares, the share capital is diluted and the price of shares falls.

For the sake of completeness, you may compare bitUSD with BTC .. which has no dilution!

67
BM,I warn you that your feckless decisions have already impaired a lot of stakeholders greatly and the market vigorously gives the result!  Why does people love BTC? Radically because the amount can not be manipulated by such financial organizations as U.S. Federal Reserve and our fortune cannot be diluted.  So in my view, any idea like hard fork or dilution is extremely stupid!

68
我猜大部分人不满是因为,自己并没有参与到提议-决议中,没有话语权/反对权。
这话说的对。

事实上,BM的提议来源于论坛上的讨论,并非拍脑袋就出来。
这个不对,英文区,你见过几个反对bm的,都是一帮打手。
我提一个观点 一帮人来打我。
说穿了,他们是一意孤行,投资者最有权力说话,真金白银的投下去的。
他们过河拆桥,根本容不得,我们说话。
我要是有翻译,他们那些狗屁理由,我直接拨的他们没话说。

没错,英文区很多是3I的人,感觉到了!好多人,在夸BM厉害,聪明,简直是一帮混蛋!
在我看来,受托人是个荣誉性的角色,现在被BM弄得全是金钱概念,stupid idea!最后,给了受托人利益,受损害的全是bts的股东,另外带来了通胀的概念!人们为什么喜欢比特币?就是因为央行,美联储印发了太多的钱,现在btsx系统年年增发,这个跟印钱有什么区别???简直就是把我们小散户,当成SB了!我建议大家都去英文区,骂死BM!让3I的中国团队,直接翻译给BM这头驴!

69
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 合并其实pts ags占了很大便宜。
« on: October 23, 2014, 08:59:38 am »
没错,再不好好搞,其他人的进度马上就上来了,这么长时间,连个稳定的wallet都搞不定,还整天吹,团队一流,shit!BM这帮鸟整天忽悠,隔三差五地出个馊主意,迟早要被大公司超过的!

70
谁能给我转一个btsx?谢谢呀

71
账户公钥  BTSX81UaRBb5JCRB5uKr1VgUyiMd4rs1utDv4NfxtC23P5S2LRGRRL
谢谢!

72
中文 (Chinese) / Re: pts真让人心寒
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:54:14 am »
BM在美国那边肯定有大动作

73
中文 (Chinese) / 钱包not connected
« on: October 22, 2014, 07:33:33 am »
请问为什么这两天我的钱包老是not connected

74
General Discussion / Re: best solution for merging ags、pts and btsx
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:42:05 pm »
To compensate ags/pts holders, Invictus should use the btsx shares of its own to buy back both ags and pts instead of increasing 20% of btsx total amount. As such, 2 billions btsx shares need not be expanded.  Actually, as Invictus holds a lot of ags/pts, the big part of the btsx shares Invictus consumes still go back to Invictus. I thinks  that this is the best solution.

And you think I3 has enough shares for the buy back while still owning enough for themselves?  Why would they develop for this ecosystem with no shares?
hope that BM can give more exact info.

75
General Discussion / Re: best solution for merging ags、pts and btsx
« on: October 21, 2014, 03:39:46 pm »
To compensate ags/pts holders, Invictus should use the btsx shares of its own to buy back both ags and pts instead of increasing 20% of btsx total amount. As such, 2 billions btsx shares need not be expanded.  Actually, as Invictus holds a lot of ags/pts, the big part of the btsx shares Invictus consumes still go back to Invictus. I thinks  that this is the best solution.
I think not. These funds should be used for further development.
But Invictus buys back ags/pts by adding 20% btsx shares, which definitely impairs btsx holders. Although btsx shareholders will possibly acquire some shares of future DACs, this is really alike the previous commitments made to ags/pts holders. And now btsx holders think that Invictus protects itself well from any loss and risk!isn't it?

You might want to read my "analysis" here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10225.0 .
BTSX holders were promised 100% stake in future BTSX Descendants but not in future 3rd party DACs. With the merge they will get stake in all future DACs. This is fair deal even when 1B new shares are issued and transferred to PTS/AGS.

Moreover regardless of distribution scheme AGS and PTS holders prior feb28 are unaffected. Assuming they still hold the AGS/PTS.

I only know that the sum of btsx shares increases 20%. In my view, it is an important rule to keep the sum unchanged. Moreover, PTS holders who have already got btsx shares will acquire it again. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6