Would it happen that one day Cryptonomex (and bytemaster) stops contributing/putting up proposals to improve/working on bitshares?
I see a divergence of interest between bytemaster and bitshares here. It is true that bitshares is his brainchild, hence the expected emotional and financial commitments (up to the proportional amount of BTS held).

However, what if one day, NASDAQ approaches cryptonomex and wants to do an upgrade to their trade engine. Cryptonomex team and bytemaster will work on that and leave bitshares for good, because after all, after the switch over to 2.0 bitshares is a decentralised community without true leaders but shareholders. Bytemaster also stated clearly that cryptonomex - bitshares relationship will solely be a contractor one. A decentralised community is good but a leaderless one is not. **We need Dan, Stan, Vikram and the guys who have been leading (*NOT dictating*) the community all this while, to continue to do so. A contractor role imho is definitely insufficient. I want Dan to be the CEO (and major shareholder) of bitshares, not just another major shareholder.

I will stay in BTS, until the day bytemaster (or cryptonomex for that matter) stops being a contractor, definitely.

I would love to hear the man (Dan) opinions on my concern about the commitment issue I am seeing and whether it is unfounded. 

How did you do it? I thought the card is still not available? (according to nanocard website)

ordered my nanocard this morning too

At least change it to your own exchange name.

Third party deposits

Third party deposits are prohibited. Third party transfers from corporate bank accounts require further KYC

checking. Please contact our support before making a transaction.

What is third party deposit?

Third party deposits are defined as those deposits which originate from or are drawn upon an account at a

financial institution which is titled in a name other than that of the receiving Bitstamp account holder(s).

Yours sincerely

The CCEDK Admin

Thanks Stan for the clarification

The Ripple network is an open network. No one, including Ripple Labs, can prevent others from using or building on the Ripple protocol as they desire.

Is it hinting that others can build similar to Ripple Trade and choose not to have ID-verification? If so, this will make it optional like what Bitshares is aiming at.

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on May 28, 2015, 05:25:21 am

never forget

don't look now, but teh Doge took over 4th.

Vikram edited Stans thread removing the detailed date. Maybe not 8th but obviously June.

which thread? details of the difference (modification by vikram)?

Quote from: bubble789 on May 28, 2015, 06:16:23 am

meanwhile, is btc38 down?

No

shit..must be me or my computer then

I am doing reindexing now, still says "severe network problem" though..