Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
how many referral sign-ups did you make via your videos?Four referrals so far, linked on the blockchain. We can't detect referrals that didn't use the suggested referral link, so there are likely more.
See http://cryptofresh.com/u/chronos-youtube for the details (remember to exclude my test referrals).
I looked at the Montero site and could not get a good indication as to why the tech is better. All I know is the basic knowledge that it is better for stealth transactions. Why would you say it I had better tech than Bitshares?Hi Ander,
In your opinion which technology is better all around Bitshares or Monero?
Monero.
Doesnt mean i dont like bitshares though. But it does seem to be in an eternal funk.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Apparently, anonymous transactions are in high demand among crypto punks. Bitshares could just copy XMR implementation and become a better technology in their eyes.
I think you miss the point. I don't think we need a new web site that looks better. We just need to explain better what BitShares can do the regular guys, the trader, the small and big entrepeneurs, ... That would one part of the change apply to it, the other part would be to show the projects already running on BitShares and feed the news in the ecosystem there.
People visiting BitShares could see, in one place, what is Bitshares, what is build on it, what you can do with it, what is happenning and what would probably happen soon.
I don't mean to be aggressive toward you but this is the same kind of conversation we had with the China anti dilution movement. People gave good arguments toward new evolutions of BitShares (worker through dilution) and you seem to try to counter argue with any argument you can find, even if it doesn't fit the debate.
Chris explained he doesn't want a new image of BitShares, he just want more and easier to understand information and use cases, which is, IMO, a very good thing. You come here and basically say "a prettier web site doesn't solve anything", you are right, but it's not the debate at all !
Do you even listen what Cris said during the hangout ?
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Well ... this is called evolution, you analyse what is wrong, what can be better and you make the change. If not, you disappear ...I recommand to everyone to listen the hangout. Chris explain why the new website. It starts at the 20th minuts.
Looks like a no brainer when you listen to him. The money spend in the new website is nothing compare to what it can brings.
Just one guy visiting the website and having the idea of creating a smartcoin that bring 100 ppl with only 50$. These ppl buying in bts to reach the smartcoin and that's it, we have a positiv ROI.
Even if you have only 1 more % visitor digging in BTS instead of leaving (much of bitcoiner and steemer are probably doing that right now) would be worth it. Within the corse of the next year is a lot a ppl, that would speak to other ppl and so on. Only one of them beeing a small whale and boum ! We gain 5 stable % of MC and everybody wins.
Network effect is very important in cryptos. Right now our shop window is displaying the blueprint of BitShares, is way too technical to grap the attention of small entrepeneurs and general public.
To make a simple analogy, Tesla is not selling its cars with a photo of the interior of the electric motor and technical specs of the diferents parts of the car. They sell a very nice, low cost, fast electric car. If you want the specs, you dig ... Why ? Because you represent 5% of the visitors of the website.
Don't invest anything in BTS and hope it will take off is not the way to go.
There is two way this experiment can go.
1) we invest in every positive feature BTS can implement, we may lose a few % of MC now but when it takes off, we will be one the giant crypto projects in the future (every body here probably very rich). If it never takes off, it won't matter to have lost a few % at the begenning anyway. (No brainer)
2) we don't invest anything, we cross our fingers and wait. If it takes off that way, it won't matter to have lost a few % at the beginning because we will all made a big return on our investment BUT with no develoment we will be a the verge of beeing overtake by the tech, investors will run away considering their ROI and the danger of competition and the MC will fall back quickly. If we don't invest anything and it never takes off, it won't matter to have kept a few % of MC at the beginning by no diluting because the BTS won't be worth anything anyway.
I don't see any other possible evolution. When considering that, why not chose the only reasonable way ?
Let's start by upvoting the web site worker
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Sound like the same reason every time the website has reinvented again and again .
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I recommand to everyone to listen the hangout. Chris explain why the new website. It starts at the 20th minuts.
Looks like a no brainer when you listen to him. The money spend in the new website is nothing compare to what it can brings.
Just one guy visiting the website and having the idea of creating a smartcoin that bring 100 ppl with only 50$. These ppl buying in bts to reach the smartcoin and that's it, we have a positiv ROI.
Even if you have only 1 more % visitor digging in BTS instead of leaving (much of bitcoiner and steemer are probably doing that right now) would be worth it. Within the corse of the next year is a lot a ppl, that would speak to other ppl and so on. Only one of them beeing a small whale and boum ! We gain 5 stable % of MC and everybody wins.
Network effect is very important in cryptos. Right now our shop window is displaying the blueprint of BitShares, is way too technical to grap the attention of small entrepeneurs and general public.
To make a simple analogy, Tesla is not selling its cars with a photo of the interior of the electric motor and technical specs of the diferents parts of the car. They sell a very nice, low cost, fast electric car. If you want the specs, you dig ... Why ? Because you represent 5% of the visitors of the website.
Don't invest anything in BTS and hope it will take off is not the way to go.
There is two way this experiment can go.
1) we invest in every positive feature BTS can implement, we may lose a few % of MC now but when it takes off, we will be one the giant crypto projects in the future (every body here probably very rich). If it never takes off, it won't matter to have lost a few % at the begenning anyway. (No brainer)
2) we don't invest anything, we cross our fingers and wait. If it takes off that way, it won't matter to have lost a few % at the beginning because we will all made a big return on our investment BUT with no develoment we will be a the verge of beeing overtake by the tech, investors will run away considering their ROI and the danger of competition and the MC will fall back quickly. If we don't invest anything and it never takes off, it won't matter to have kept a few % of MC at the beginning by no diluting because the BTS won't be worth anything anyway.
I don't see any other possible evolution. When considering that, why not chose the only reasonable way ?
Let's start by upvoting the web site worker
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Dilution would only come from forced settlements.
Yea, that "little fish" problem is my biggest complaint with STEEM at the moment. If you're not already an established "high-earning poster", whales will miss your post among all the noise and good posts just get buried. People with track records of high-earning posts are the ones that are immediately picked up by whales/bots (oftentimes regardless of the post's actual value), so they're the only ones able to really get time in the spotlight. It's a self-promoting cycle that really only benefits those that are already whales.
Looks like this Steem bull run might be good for Bitshares after all...
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Can someone please ELI5 Dan/STEEM/BTS for me?
I noticed STEEM going parabolic on CMC today, thought I'd check out the latest epic pump'n'dump and found Dan at the bottom of the rabbit hole. Not something I expected.
Then I hit Bitsharestalk and find a whole lot of pissed off folks with a pretty consistent sentiment that Dan has absconded with knowledge/experience/ideas funded by the PTS/AGS investors (of which I am one) and is using them to enrich a small, centralized cadre of "Steemit"(?) developers/investors via a heavily pre-mined coin apparently designed to game CMC. Also not something I expected.
Finally, it appears that although Steemit would not exist without Bitshares technology/codebase and substantial contributions from Bitshares lead developer (Bytemaster), there is currently no clear roadmap for a share drop on the PTS/AGS/BTSX/BTS folks. Definitely not expected!
I'm currently trying to maintain an open mind, as I continue to believe in Dan's vision and talent, but from where I'm standing this situation is pretty much ass end opposite of everything Bitshares stands for.
Help an old guy out, thank you!
in the beginning, it was told it is bytemaster alone, but if you look into the whitepaper you find any bitshares CNX codername i know, so he took the whole team with him and left bitshares without preperation on his own. only svk is left as a sole contributor to the codebase and the guys from blocktrades (and they are also heavily in steem).
because they promised to give away 10% for every future project, they gamed the words and just frontmined the whole steem project and they will tell you "there was nothing to give and you could mine by your own" - true - but every none technical guy was thrown away.
