Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Troglodactyl

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 64
271
General Discussion / Re: Clarification on trading engine & matching
« on: April 14, 2015, 12:09:58 pm »
I believe orders are matched highest bid to lowest ask, and that only equal priced orders are sequenced non-deterministically.  I'll have to confirm this.

No, equal priced orders are ordered according to their owner address.

Hm, as I'm writing this I realize this could be a problem...

Ok, but the rest of what I said should be accurate?  Owner address sorting basically just means that serious traders can use proof of work to get preferential order matching treatment by finding a "better" address to trade from.  Not catastrophic, just a little weird.

272
General Discussion / Re: Clarification on trading engine & matching
« on: April 14, 2015, 11:42:46 am »
Actually not at the end of each block but somewhere in between. An important point is that the market engine runs *before* new orders are applied to the market, i. e. after creating an order it will take at least two blocks before it has been executed.

What's the rationale behind this? Why aren't orders matched as they go into the current block?

I believe orders are matched highest bid to lowest ask, and that only equal priced orders are sequenced non-deterministically.  I'll have to confirm this.

If this is the case, then it won't be known which orders should match until the full list of orders for the given block is complete.  Then, the actual processing of the order list takes some time, and delegates don't want to miss their block production time.  So then the only way is to finalize the order list in one block, process that list between blocks, and then finalize it in the following block.

273
I think the idea has merit.

274
I think a lot of our grass roots customer acquisition will be greatly accelerated once we have solid light and mobile wallets.

I know that's what I'm waiting for before I start seriously recruiting less technical friends.

275
Auto routing isn't even going to be really relevant until we have more liquidity and tighter spreads, I think.  At that point we could have either auto routing, or people will probably write arb bots.

276
General Discussion / Re: Now we are at the bottom.
« on: April 10, 2015, 05:29:17 pm »


What I think the platform needs, is the ability to look at everything priced in BitUSD, BitCNY, BitEUR. So it looks like a real trading platform and would appeal to those who want to use it as such.

Take for example ability to trade the pairs BitUSD:BitCNY, or BitCNY:BitGOLD, etc. That would really create demand for BitUSD, BitCNY, etc.
...

You can already do this. Every asset is tradable against every other asset already, most of those markets just don't have much adoption and liquidity.

277
General Discussion / Re: [ALERT] Abnormal trading activities at BTC38
« on: April 10, 2015, 04:07:43 am »
Ugh, again with the BTC38 FUD. So damn tired of them having so much control over the price. Why the hell dont we have volume anywhere else?? I just dont get how we can have such an awesome decentralized system wrapped in the hands of a single centralized exchange...makes no sense.

Yup, truly a shame. When shit hit the fan with BTER I was hoping Yunbi would pick up the slack but.... nope.

At least we've got https://blocktrades.us/ and https://metaexchange.info/

278
If kind of screenshot, or demo video is provided in pace with the launch, it would be better. People still cannot believe why Moonstone is important and how it is awesome.

Great Idea clayop!

I think a row of videos and giving more visual importance to the potential 15% return might be super important.

Anything else we should add or change?

^ This.  No offence, but at this point there's no actual video showing anything that works (as far as I know), and no publicly accessible source code.  The more you can show people to convince them it isn't vaporware, the more comfortable they'll be contributing.

Have you seen this video ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0FU0OyaB94

No, I had not, thank you.

279
If kind of screenshot, or demo video is provided in pace with the launch, it would be better. People still cannot believe why Moonstone is important and how it is awesome.

Great Idea clayop!

I think a row of videos and giving more visual importance to the potential 15% return might be super important.

Anything else we should add or change?

^ This.  No offence, but at this point there's no actual video showing anything that works (as far as I know), and no publicly accessible source code.  The more you can show people to convince them it isn't vaporware, the more comfortable they'll be contributing.

280
General Discussion / Re: Used all my BTS to short bitUSD......
« on: April 08, 2015, 01:33:43 am »
I realize it's a bit late now, but for any other readers, this is much easier to manage if you break up your shorts into small orders.  That way you can roll it all over gradually with a lot less extra BTS.

Is it all a single order coming due at once?

281
General Discussion / Re: Research Help
« on: April 06, 2015, 11:35:25 am »
Why not call multisig accounts (shared accounts)?
Shared accounts I think generally allow any member to spend independently of the others. Perhaps "corporate accounts"?

282
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: can notes be claimed yet?
« on: April 05, 2015, 05:57:38 pm »
Yes, NOTEs are trading on BitShares.  If you import your AGS and PTS keys, you should see them in your BitShares wallet.

283
Rewarding voters encourages uneducated voting, which is not useful.  The incentive to vote is taking care of your investment so it becomes more valuable as the system becomes more useful.

284
The dilution rate is lower than that of Bitcoin, and can actually be focused toward more useful contributions than mining.  If the transition to dilution is a major factor in the market cap dropping, I think it's a result of the way the change was handled, not a response to the change itself.  Thus, reversing it could just scramble things even more.  If you want to get rid of dilution without further disrupting the system, I suggest running and voting for low or zero pay delegates.

285
General Discussion / Re: Research Help
« on: April 05, 2015, 04:39:45 am »
ZeroCash paper: http://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-oakland2014.pdf
Extended version: http://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf

ZeroCash claims to improve on ZeroCoin by using zero knowledge Succinct Non-interactive ARguments of Knowledge (zkSNARK), bringing transaction sizes down to <1KB and verification times down to <6ms.

Here's a work in progress C++ library for zkSNARKS: https://github.com/scipr-lab/libsnark

I can investigate further if you let me know what you're after, but I should warn you that I really don't understand the math behind these at all.

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 64