Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MarkoPaasila

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
16
Great news! I have one concern though. It is not clear from the proposal how decentralized will be your bots. Since you plan to use funding through WP, I would expect the resulting product to belong to community and server nodes to be easy to run by anybody. Btsbots is great, but it was ran in a centralized way, and wee see what happened.  Could you make any comments regarding this concern?

We will not provide servers for the purpose. Everyone has to run the bots on their own computers or servers. Many of the market making strategies are suitable for use on computers that aren't on all the time. So it will create a very redundant swarm of decentralized bots, where everyone holds their own keys, and many their own nodes.

So market making pro's can run this on a server, and normal people plus noobs can do it on a laptop. There will be a CLI version and an installable GUI version.

ugh, I'm out.

Doe's ""I'm out" mean you think somethings wrong with the approach, or that everything is fine? If something is wrong, please let me know what. Feedback is what we want.

17
Great news! I have one concern though. It is not clear from the proposal how decentralized will be your bots. Since you plan to use funding through WP, I would expect the resulting product to belong to community and server nodes to be easy to run by anybody. Btsbots is great, but it was ran in a centralized way, and wee see what happened.  Could you make any comments regarding this concern?

We will not provide servers for the purpose. Everyone has to run the bots on their own computers or servers. Many of the market making strategies are suitable for use on computers that aren't on all the time. So it will create a very redundant swarm of decentralized bots, where everyone holds their own keys, and many their own nodes.

So market making pro's can run this on a server, and normal people plus noobs can do it on a laptop. There will be a CLI version and an installable GUI version.

18
The draft proposal is very well detailed and thought out.  Especially the payment terms bring credibility: "The received funds will be held in escrow by the Bitshares Foundation, and released at successful delivery of milestones."

-Has any software already started being coded?
-When will the worker proposal be created?

The Proposal will hopefully be made before Monday.

No software has been developed so far under this WP. With some good luck and good will from the community we could start coding right after New Year.

19
General Discussion / Re: Wikipedia page is live
« on: December 05, 2017, 10:16:41 am »
I don't think you can do that. But you can get a community-multisig to act as an escrow and release the funds to you as you propose.

20
Quote
Bitshares does a horrible job of reporting / P&L anyway (for now), as you can't export your trade histories more than a few blocks back.

This is true, and this is pita. If this proposal would address P&L reporting issue, I would support this worker without asking no more questions, plus offer a donation on top.

We very much would like to include P/L reporting, but aren't quite sure how to calculate profit. Like if you trade in the BTS:EOS market, how would you report profits? You can't do it in USD, because if both go down in terms of USD, you report a loss even if the bot has made a profit. Maybe compare the outcome to just holding the initial balance - and that on a graph over time. What do you think?

21
If the bot was released open source on github, and could run from Ubuntu, I'd be interested.

If the bot was even hard coded to give a 1% donation from all profitable trades to a hardcoded BTS user, I'd even leave that in there to support the developers myself. Of course anyone could take that out, but if I get 99% profit from using the bot, I'd use it.

Don't bother trying to donate from the profit. That's a whole huge can of worms. Profit is NOT easy to calculate from a MM bot - AND, Bitshares does a horrible job of reporting / P&L anyway (for now), as you can't export your trade histories more than a few blocks back.

Coming from a seasoned market maker, I encourage you not to code in any donations based on profit. The whole point of BitShares is that you wouldn't need to anyway - that's what the Bitshares funding mechanism is for (worker).

In any case, BitShares desperately needs more liquidity. It would be cool if this helped the average user participate in market making - love this movement! Nice work!

Bot shouldn't focus too much on profit at first. Just make a way for noobs to add buy and sell walls with X% difference from feed price. More advanced techniques can come later easily.

I absolutely agree with you, especially as profits are really hard to calculate. Like if you trade in the EOS:STEEM market, which one of them to calculate profits in? Or should profits be calculated in some third asset? Profit compared to what, just holding? Over what time period? In addition the value of an asset is hypothetical until it is converted, so all comparisons and supposed profits are also hypothetical. So you are very right about this.

But I really think market making is probably profitable statistically. With a smart market making strategy you are more likely to profit than to loose. You need to choose the assets wisely - to avoid ending up with a bag of worthless assets. Then you need to estimate short term volatility and the price range you think the price will likely stay within long-term. After that you can very likely make a profit.

The possibility - even probability - of a profit will be the main reason for many people to use the bot in the first place, and I would like to tap into that source of motivation, so that as many users as possible would join the force and provide the added value to the network. I would also like the people deciding the fate of the WP (voters) to see the incredible power of this possibility - but without giving any empty promises. By collectively investing a few thousand dollars BitShares would have something incredibly appealing. It could bring thousands of new users, and activate passive observers. I just don't know how to communicate this effectively without people getting a knee-jerk reaction that it sounds like a scam.

22
How can I address this issue to core and UI developers in order to estimate and create a worker proposal?

I think we lack manpower. The best way to proceed would probably be to find a good developer ( not so easy task ), and make a WP together with him. If we had more developers things would move faster. The community seems pretty positive about funding good work nowadays.

23
General Discussion / Re: Wikipedia page is live
« on: December 04, 2017, 12:35:20 pm »
I would try to get paid by posting what you do onto Steem, and maybe try to get some whaleshares. You could also join the beyond bitcoin hangout to get publicity. I think you would get some tips if you politely ask for some. Maybe enough to compensate for your work. I will certainly give you a tip.

24
General Discussion / Re: Wikipedia page is live
« on: December 04, 2017, 12:17:09 pm »
Nice! I actually started to write it too, but never got it finished. Pretty much work. Glad you got it done, and also approved.

Can anyone contribute to improve the article? You have made a really good start, and I would be glad to participate.

25
From alt 9 hours ago with regards to btsbots:

btsbots.com will not support the fork because of the unreasonable trade logic.

so if this fork happened, btsbots will stop all service for Bitshares.
include feed price source and trade bots etc.

Oh no. We must hurry up now.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

26
If the bot was released open source on github, and could run from Ubuntu, I'd be interested.

If the bot was even hard coded to give a 1% donation from all profitable trades to a hardcoded BTS user, I'd even leave that in there to support the developers myself. Of course anyone could take that out, but if I get 99% profit from using the bot, I'd use it.

We will release it under the GPL or MIT licences, because it will be funded collectively and thus owned by the community. In addition, I wouldn't want to risk my funds by putting my private key's in a black box, so it just must be open source.

We very much intend to make it cross platform. Not just Linux and iOS, but even Windows. :-)

That 1% idea could be a good option if the WP doesn't pass. Thanks!

27
Whenever I read promises like these
Quote
Someone tells you that there is a way to increase the value of your coin and simultaneously accumulate more of it. An easy way. You can just stake your coins and get a passive income. Like you can have your own masternode with as little as $1. You might earn 0.01% per day, or 10%. Depends on the day. And you don't even take the value from someone else.

a klaxon goes off  in my head and a big red sign reading "SCAMMER" lights up.

You cannot write a bot that trades with a guaranteed profit.

You are very right. That was just my poor attempt to make a nice opening paragraph for this pre-announcement, the purpose of which is to get community feedback in order to get the WP right - that we promise the right things. So the Worker Proposal won't include such statements, neither will the deliverable software itself.

That said, I think that no matter how the software and "staking" opportunity is presented to people, many will make use of it purely because of the appeal of possible  passive income. It's incredibly appealing, and DASH and several other coins (recently Waltoncoin) has made use of that, and tapped into user's greed, creating a nice positive feedback loop. We want to achieve something similar, but without empty promises of course.

Thanks for the feedback!

28
Imagine you held some cryptocurrency. Someone tells you that there is a way to increase the value of your coin and simultaneously accumulate more of it. An easy way. You can just stake your coins and get a passive income. Like you can have your own masternode with as little as $1. You might earn 0.01% per day, or 10%. Depends on the day. And you don't even take the value from someone else. No, you increase the value of the whole.

It sounds good doesn't it? That's the appeal of passive income. It's incredibly powerful. That's what we intend to do for Bitshares.

We will make a Worker Proposal about making liquidity bot software. There already are some alternatives, but we will provide:

User Friendly, Appealing Liquidity Bot software Free for Anyone to Use on BitShares.

When our work is done, people will find an easy to use liquidity bot with several liquidity providing strategies optimized for BitShares. The software will be especially tailored for the average user, for who anything complicated is an insurmountable obstacle. The goal is that every single user can benefit from the bot, and hence, benefit Bitshares.

Solve the Chicken-Egg Problem of Liquidity and Volume

Most people simply hold their coins in a wallet. When they need to exchange for something else, they look for a liquid market. On the other hand, when liquidity providers choose a market, they look for an active one. This is a chicken-egg problem.

Once our work is done, people who would otherwise just hold their coins, will have the road paved for them to provide liquidity in any market. Once people start trading in the new markets, the liquidity providers will earn the spreads. This will help bootstrap lots of new markets.

Improve the Liquidity of Existing Markets

All the markets on Bitshares are incredibly shallow compared to many centralized exchanges. This situation will gradually improve, but with lots of new liquidity providers things will speed up. Time is money.

Better than Letting Your Coins Rust - Passive Income

With most coins out there you can't do anything. They just lie idle in peoples wallets. With a way to make your money work for you, would you not do just that? With user friendly software anyone can put any currency to work. Compounding profits is an incredibly powerful force. We think this possibility will make Bitshares as an exchange very appealing first of all to BTS holders, but also to holders of other coins. Finally Bitshares will have what DASH and many other blockchains have; a way to stake your assets and get a passive income. Even a small income has proven to be a powerful incentive for "staking". People also don't even have to touch BTS, BTC or Fiat. They can earn a passive income of their currency of choice!

Many will wonder if providing liquidity actually yields any profit. Of course this is a very complex subject, but in general you can think of liquidity providing as the opposite of paying a premium. If you want to buy now for whatever price is available, you pay for the privilege. The ones who benefit are the ones providing liquidity. They buy low and sell high. Constantly. Many community members in Bitshares are providing liquidity to the markets, and making some nice profit. Check out the Bitshares Liquidity Group in Telegram. https://t.me/DEXLIQUIDITYBTS

Lots and Lots of Benefits to the Community

  • There will be a greater demand for Lifetime Memberships - and referral income
  • The extra excitement about BitShares
  • Proponents of other cryptocurrencies will be incentivized to provide liquidity on BitShares, while benefiting all three; BitShares, the other cryptocurrency, and the person himself
  • Market Depth Charts will look much better, improving the user experience and encouraging trading on BitShares
  • Simply more transactions - activity
  • Holders will have the incentive to migrate to BitShares from other centralized exchanges
  • More people will be exposed to the actual Bitshares, not just BTS. This could result in more voting activity, more word-of-mouth, a more positive sentiment about Bitshares.
  • More people will put their BTS on the markets or short MPA's; effectively reducing the BTS supply
  • We will have attracted new developers who have become familiar with Bitshares and able to contribute more in the future
  • We will better support businesses building on Bitshares, like Bitspark
  • The combined effect of all the above might start a snowball-effect, providing the final push over the tipping point

We intend to start working in January.

Please Contribute and Give Your Opinions

This will be a Worker Proposal, and we want community input in order to get it right. After all, the community as a whole should benefit from this more than any individual.

The WP draft is on Google Docs. Feel free to comment and make changes. We will review them. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2rMlMiMufHdZEirc8x9lKuqSHvLAsVDOYK3xr4AfYE/edit?usp=sharing

There is also a Telegram group dedicated to this WP. https://t.me/BTSLiquidityBotWorkerProposal

29
Could we pay some worker in BitUSD borrowed by the committee? That would increase the amount of BitUSD in circulation. Now we are doing the opposite: buying BitUSD from the market to pay for workers. So workers are effectively exaggerating the problem.

workers are already paid in bitusd via escrows

But the bitUSD is bought from the market at a premium, not borrowed. By buying from the market the committee effectively helps push the price further from the peg.

30
Could we pay some worker in BitUSD borrowed by the committee? That would increase the amount of BitUSD in circulation. Now we are doing the opposite: buying BitUSD from the market to pay for workers. So workers are effectively exaggerating the problem.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6