31
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 关于建立社区多签投票账户的提议
« on: August 14, 2019, 03:40:06 am »
经过cn vote第一次选举,进入投票多签名单的是 教授 小宁大大 道枝 舞天非月 三胖 finn PTS中国
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I like your paper!Greetings Alex, is this still on track? I just submitted a draft of a research paper for the academic track. If it's accepted by the conference, I'll plan to try to travel over there to give a talk on the research as long as my research worker proposal has been funded sufficiently by then to support a long-term project.
If it happens that I don't have sufficient levels of project funding by then but my paper is accepted anyway, will your worker be able to reimburse my travel to Greece for this? If so, the final published version of the paper would still reference BitShares as the source of funds for the work, if that's any concern to you.
Yes still on track.
I'm sure that wont be a problem...So get packing
Excellent, the paper is submitted and available for community review here.
Can you post a summary of this worker in here as well please? If possible with links and references of media and social media coverage
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15
I am confused by the way you have setup the table there. You mention incoming and outgoing payments, and I can't identify where this workers own budget comes in. My questions:
- How much funds have been collected through this worker?
- Where are those funds shown in the table of https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15?
- Is there anything left over that will be returned?
- Can you please clarify what "market fee for huodongxing" and "safeguard service" is?
Please summarize and finalize this worker before tapping into funds of another worker.
Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?
A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?
Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.
up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.
jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.
so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.
Wait, wait... Witness Still haven't provide transparency for worker accounting and told you in polite way to fuck off and use leftover on unmanaged worker funds ?
Im sorry if im too direct, no bad meaning towards yourself or Jademont.
jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.I confirm this. The guy who is controlling account "still" has left BTS community and rejected to spend more time on the reporting of this worker. I appreciate his contribution on this worker but it is very unprofessional to ignore the report.
Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?
A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?
Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.
up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.
jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.
so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.
Sounds like a good suggestion. It can be done at the same time. The two plans do not conflict.I do not support this proposal.
comparing to the daily BTS release via worker proposal budget, the market fee accumulation is so few that can be ignored and will not generate obvious effect.
I prefer to set smartcoins 100% market fee sharing, I believe this will greatly encourage users to become lifetime member and invite more users to come to BTS ecosystem.
this is a much better way to use the smartcoin market fee than "buy back BTS and burn".
Agree on that