Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Markus

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25
121
General Discussion / Re: What if BitAsset holders refuse to sell?
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:59:07 pm »
Sorry if this is an old conversation:

Right now the BitBTC market is thin - no one is shorting or selling any BitBTC. You could theorize that anyone who currently does hold BitBTC is short-term bearish on BTS.

So ive been contemplating what if someone does buy a largish amount of BitBTC right now and refuses to sell it? If BTS were then to drop by 50% there is no one who is selling BitBTC which can be used to cover short positions. To someone new to BitShares, it seems to be a matter of blind faith that the lead developers wont dump and crash it 50% causing a blowout in the BitBTC peg.

The BitUSD market is less vulnerable because its volume is large.
How could someone buy a large amount if no one was selling?

122
The technical problem with this is maintaining a sell order that moves with the feed price, which is costly and manual, and I'm not sure of the best solution here yet. So in practice, this does have risk of not getting hit when or where an arbitrager might want it to.

If you have a long-term long position in BTSX you can create a moving sell order by:
Creating a short order and making sure you are offering the highest interest rate. Because you are long in the BitAsset you just cover as soon as your short order gets matched and the interest does not bother you.

123
General Discussion / Re: Cannot publish price feed
« on: November 11, 2014, 09:59:44 pm »
What if we allowed marginal delegates (maybe rank 102-120) to publish feeds? These feeds would be disregarded for the median. But that way those delegates could prove their reliability to attract votes.

124
General Discussion / Re: bitEuro trading?
« on: November 11, 2014, 09:49:26 pm »
It was active with enough feeds about 24 hours ago. Some trading happened but the market has frozen again.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11196

125
General Discussion / Re: BitEUR is trading
« on: November 11, 2014, 09:23:18 am »
Buying and selling should still work.
Just the supply will be limited to 1501 until the missing delegates remember their duties.

126
General Discussion / BitEUR is trading
« on: November 10, 2014, 09:58:29 pm »
With now 52 price feeds BitEUR has become the fifth market to open.

Enjoy.

127
IDentabit / Re: John Underwood Visit
« on: November 08, 2014, 04:12:45 am »
Great news! Since BitPTS is not really needed anymore, maybe we can replace it with BitPHP?

128
Deutsch (German) / Re: Übersetzungen zB. Assets
« on: October 31, 2014, 09:33:42 am »
BitGut

129
From another thread:

One thing, fairly easy to implement and creating demand for BitAssets instantly would be:

Allow shorts post their collateral in BitAssets, not just BTSX.

For example if you think the BTC/USD ratio is overvalued and will sink, you can't hedge that in BitShares. It would be cool to be able to short BitBTC against BitUSD. This creates extra demand for BTSX because the BitUSD used in the collateral would have to be created by somebody else in the first place, using BTSX as collateral.

That would be nice.

130
Check out this negative reply from BM
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9323.msg120763#msg120763

I still don't understand why it would be so difficult to implement this for buy-orders since it's already done for short orders.
Thanks for the link!
I'll have to defer to his knowledge of the codebase on this one, but I agree - it seems like it should take very little effort. Seems.

The thing is, automated bots would provide only a tiny marginal benefit over sliding orders. Sliding orders ARE trading bots, built into the protocol so everybody can use them.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

The problem is the price feed lags and your sliding orders would be easily taken advantage of.   It isn't a technical issue, it is an economic one.

I agree with that. I misunderstood your original reply; thought you were referring to technical difficulties implementing it.

131
Check out this negative reply from BM
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9323.msg120763#msg120763

I still don't understand why it would be so difficult to implement this for buy-orders since it's already done for short orders.

132
General Discussion / Re: NuBits
« on: October 14, 2014, 07:41:02 am »
A good indicator for diminishing demand for Nubits will be their parking interest rate rising.
I've had a look here (https://blockexplorer.nu/status) the last couple of days and it always said no rates available. Today for the first time:

Quote
Park Rates in Effect
No. BlocksRateDuration
8,1920.002%5 days 16 hours

133
General Discussion / Re: Latest Bitcoin news - Caution Alert
« on: October 10, 2014, 01:24:00 pm »
I think we may be freaking out about nothing.

After a quick assessment, Invictus is a company registered in Hong Kong, China. Meaning that the SEC would probably not have jurisdiction.

http://bitshares.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/BitShares-Trust-Published%20July-18-2014.pdf

After reading this I assume the Angelfund is safely locked away in Hong Kong.

III was just the escrow agent and is probably a more or less empty shell by now. Any kind of fine would then bankrupt it but who would care. Hong Kong would just found III.2

134
General Discussion / Re: BitNu - Funding BTSX without Inflation...
« on: October 09, 2014, 12:18:20 pm »
From the Nubits Whitepaper:
Quote
When this occurs, NuBit demand will decline permanently. The end of the currency will be marked by interest rates rising to unprecedented highs and then going still higher until the vast majority of NuBits are parked. When market participants reach a unanimous consensus that NuBits are worthless, then they will suddenly drop to zero value from one USD. As long as a small group of speculators believe there is even a small chance NuBit demand will reach a new all time high the price will remain one USD. As the currency shows signs of stress and serious decline in levels of use NuBits will pass from ordinary businesses and people to speculators willing to take large risks for large rewards. Ownership of NuBits will centralize somewhat as the currency shows signs of stress. Failure of the currency is not synonymous with failure of the network. If there are other currencies offered by Nu, they will continue to be unaffected.

In the space between now and obsolescence, there is much that Nu can do to benefit shareholders and its users.

It seems to me they know fairly well how the story will end. I guess it all boils down to arguing about when that will happen.

135
Technical Support / Re: Canceling Open BitUSD Short Positions
« on: October 07, 2014, 11:51:31 am »
I'm having a similar problem. A couple of short orders, about the same age, that are stuck and can't  be cancelled.
Using xeroc's method in the console produces an error messages starting like this:

10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
BN_num_bits(n) <= 63:
    {}
    bitshares  bigint.cpp:55 fc::bigint::to_int64
type mismatch multiplying asset {"amount":


Using 0.4.20 64 bit, Win 7

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25