(ed: I decided to make this a new topic, instead of replying, so this is referring to my deposit of PTS to 'BeedUI', which froze my PTS well before the midnight GMT cutoff)

Personally, I've had enough of this BS.  I emailed their support saying that I didn't give a crap about Bitshares, and that I wanted to withdraw my PTS.  I'll see what happens.  If I don't get a response, I'll pay some Chinese translation site to translate it for me and resend it. 

I wanted to sell my PTS before midnight GMT, because I knew the price would drop a lot immediately after.  No way in hell the Bitshares one received would be worth the loss from that.  Sadly, I transferred my PTS to an exchange that had no clue as to what was going on. 

That being said, I don't place 100% of the fault on the exchange, a lot lies with a lack of a clear, concise explanation of when this was actually taking place (at midnight GMT) & how long it would actually take for these Bitshares to become accessible (am I suppose to wait two weeks to be able to withdraw my PTS?  lol).  The whole 'AGS' rubbish essentially just further devalued the PTS that I was, well, paying to acquire (via energy costs, server rentals, etc).

It's also bizarre how a pool that I know is taking in a ton of money (ypool) can't seem to afford to pay a couple hundred a month for decent DDoS protection.  While *constant* downtime assuredly nets less money, the large amounts of disconnects & reconnects just increases revenues for what has to be ... the greediest lot of people I've seen in the whole cryptocurrency community (as far as fees for pools and miners goes).  On one pool, I've 'found' 11 blocks, but been awarded approx. 33% of what that would have made solo.  I'm not usually one to have these conspiracy theories & it could very well just be that I've been very lucky, but in this case, well, I have my doubts.

I will leave my PTS/Bitshares node up at 5.9.24.81 for one more month, as I was actually compensated ~$40 for it in early January.  The # of connections has dropped from an avg of 500-600 to ~200-250 these last several days, but it still consumes a decent amount of system resources, & bandwidth.  Almost 3TB of upstream for this month (tons of new users downloading the entire blockchain in the last couple weeks), obv. this will be less going forward (if I had to guess, maybe 1TB for March).  I think three months (plus the several months prior to that) is fair enough.  Supposedly the DNS system is a lot more robust at picking up good nodes now, anyway.

I have ~80 PTS or so frozen on BeedUI for "wallet maintenance", I know this is explained in various other threads but it's still confusing me.

I actually sent the PTS there about 10 hours prior to midnight GMT & they closed off withdrawals about 30 minutes after I sent the PTS...  My intention was to sell all of my PTS (as quickly as possible & there had been a buy on beedui at about 15% over cryptsy valuation), but I got royally screwed there.

So now I suppose I have some Bitshares or somesuch?  Is a second client needed?  *boggle*

so when you do listtransactions does it show up in your list?

if not, do you have all the latest blocks?


[/quote]

No, the transaction does not show up in my transaction list in my wallet, and my wallet is "up to date". Still no balance in BTER and no response from them either.
[/quote]

If it doesn't even show up in wallet at all then that means they haven't broadcast it (or broadcast some malformed transaction).

PTS allows fees of 0 for high priority transactions and also when block size is <10KB, I think.  (priority is <*27KB?). 

it should at least show up

Quote from: yellowecho on February 28, 2014, 03:54:26 am

Quote from: Yepez on February 28, 2014, 01:02:54 am

I had my Protoshares at bter.com exchange,  So,  for the snapshot I transfer to my local wallet,  but in my wallet the transaction is unconfirmed.

So, please some could tell me if I am screwed and this protoshares will not count in my wallet for the snapshot?

Has been passed almost 4 Hours and have 0 confirmations.

This is my Wallet, 
PabHpkdhqyQmfLDwK9pEy3w83FsKwB3tXL
and the TxID
690e1c29b85d9f103de3634b812bf4cec55f611dd3a2151caf40f60d1f73c567

By the way,  what time is the snapshot?  GMT ?

Is your wallet currently Online?  How many active connections do you have (lower right)?  If it's your first time using the wallet, you may need to add a couple of nodes.

Yes, my wallet is currently online, i have 8 active connections.

Could you tell me which nodes do you recommend  to add?

There are more people in the exact same situation like me. 
 https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3269.0

Do you think is it possible,  bter exchange is "doing something" to make this transactions "inconsistent" or "faulty" (I don't know how to call it)  with the purpose of holding the protoshares after the Snapshot, and keeping the corresponding  bitshares for them,  and then after that release the protoshares??
I don't know if that is possible but who knows....        

I am just a newbie trying to figure it out, and trying to get in the train.   

Please,  some one could help us,  maybe contacting bter support?

if it shows up in your transaction list then it was successfully broadcast, but nobody is including it in a block

i thought protoshares had fairly lenient 0 fee rules , but maybe not?    you can check the client and see about priority size.  i always modify mine to not accept free tx, and too lazy to reDL and modify

ed: i just installed new version, it does have free transactions for under 17k.  maybe no new blocks in a while?  no clue.   if they are going slow enough, it might not get in a *block for a while if fee is at 0

if it shows up in listtransactions then that means it was broadcast at least

yeah, I got all my coins stuck on beedUI.

i thought this didnt take place for another 6 hrs?

my rates all went up about 5-10% on those earlier ones when i swapped primary pools from ypool to ptspool or whatever it is.    i think some portion of this is because the fine tuning works much better on a stable pool

I get 904 on a 2x Opteron 6274 (32x1gb)

also, the e3-1240v3 runs more like it should now, but still a bit lower than the i7-4770.  it's at 690 now, with the i7-4770 around 720

ed: i'll just edit that post with the new #'s, I guess

i've still not been full on 5.9.24.81, the highest i've seen is some ~650 connections (well, close to 700 I think, with a 980 max)

Does anybody know the CPM from the Sapphire 270x TOXIC with 2 GB?
or is the 270X 4GB better because you can run2 Threads?

THANKS

i get 1600-1700 from an msi 270 2gb (not 270x)

i imagine the 4gb version is better, i dunno though.

my 260 with 2gb of mem can get 1300