Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zvs

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13
91
On my 680 CMP is lower than on normal version...

strange, my results:

I was using my GTX 780 on my gaming machine, w/ top of the line RAM, mobo, CPU, etc... w/o even overclocking it, it would get ~9.2 rounds per second...  when I moved it to one of my old miner machines (though it isn't too bad, it's on a 680i SLI mobo, dual core e6850.. possibly the 2GB RAM?) it was only getting about 8 rounds per second

I guess that could be some of the difference

btw, would an 8800gtx be worth digging out of a storage shed for this?  or would it be something like 200-300 or less?

it gets ~1750cpm now with a modest overclock (one voltage step and 100 core)    gtx 780

92
Thanks zvs for the find, will be checking it out in a few hours and will through it in the first post if its working for me.

Anways NEW offer has been added in the first post!!.

Enjoy guys!

I went and looked at it again..... if they don't kick you off for coin farming like some other host I've heard does (dimension or something? hah),

1 dedicated CPU core   
€ 0.005
€ 0.012

the hourly price is .005 and the daily price is .012.  so i guess you would want to book it for a day.  but that would mean you could run 100 cores for like 6 days?

ed: bah, just do 95 for 7 days.

oh, I see.  you have to pay for RAM also.  each 512MB of ram is € 0.048 and you'd also need € 0.048 disk space. 

not sure how many of the other things you'd need, if it's per instance, or what

it also seems to me like they meant .12 instead of .012 for the cpu core. 

did their price calculator, thing.. 8 core, 5120 MB RAM, 10 GB HDD, 500 GB traffic, 100 Mbps uplink, says €1.633 / daily , not bad

93
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v1.0c - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 20, 2014, 08:45:23 pm »
Hello

The ratio GPU clock / Memory clock is it important?

i think it may be better to underclock memory some to raise core higher.   if it's a temp/voltage issue

otherwise  yeah just raise them both

94
On my 680 CMP is lower than on normal version...

strange, my results:

I was using my GTX 780 on my gaming machine, w/ top of the line RAM, mobo, CPU, etc... w/o even overclocking it, it would get ~9.2 rounds per second...  when I moved it to one of my old miner machines (though it isn't too bad, it's on a 680i SLI mobo, dual core e6850.. possibly the 2GB RAM?) it was only getting about 8 rounds per second

I guess that could be some of the difference

btw, would an 8800gtx be worth digging out of a storage shed for this?  or would it be something like 200-300 or less?

95
BitShares PTS / Re: "No block source available" error message
« on: January 14, 2014, 12:03:51 pm »
Hi all,

Can anyone tell me whats happened to my protoshares wallet as it can't connect for 3 days with "no block source available".   

I have already add all the node there:

addnode=cryptoseed.cloudapp.net
addnode=180.183.205.118
addnode=162.243.67.4
addnode=162.243.54.126
addnode=37.139.29.236
addnode=64.90.183.137
addnode=180.183.205.118
addnode=61.238.157.8
addnode=54.254.192.95
addnode=54.207.21.146
addnode=54.206.30.227
addnode=54.219.164.14
addnode=146.185.172.136
addnode=162.243.14.13
addnode=94.23.215.174
addnode=5.9.24.81
addnode=23.92.25.118

Can anyone tell me whats going on ?  Thanks

outgoing firewall?  (ed: or more likely some outdated client)

my own node plus at least 2 of those other ones are functional

96
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source optimized PTS CPU miner (BETA)
« on: January 13, 2014, 03:22:22 pm »
Looked like it was faster than yam on my two junk servers, but slower on the rest

it was also dumping cores everywhere with mmap failing

Thanks for the report.  The mmap failure is just a warning - it falls back to malloc.

To silence - and run a little faster with both yam and my code - run:

echo "2048" > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

But the dumping cores is bad.  Could you send me a little more detail, or a stack trace?  (And on what kind of machine?)

The slower on the rest isn't too surprising.  There are a lot of optimizations to be done yet, particularly for huge servers with respect to thread affinity and other things.  And the SHA512 code is virtually untouched from the Intel release.  The goal isn't to beat yam with this release, it's just to start the ball rolling a little bit.

There are some constants to play with to tune for different platforms, but it's not worth going there yet (unless you're interested in poking in the code).

  -Dave

Hmm, I'll try it out again later tonight.  I did check  /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages and it comes back as 0, yet proc/meminfo shows:

AnonHugePages:   4194304 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB

and afterwards:

AnonHugePages:   4194304 kB
HugePages_Total:    2048
HugePages_Free:     2048
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB

....  so even though it had the size allocation, it couldn't create any?  d'oh.  I guess maybe once I fix that everywhere it'll run faster. 

Is there any reason not to make it perm by putting vm.nr_hugepages = 2048 in sysctl.conf?

97
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source optimized PTS CPU miner (BETA)
« on: January 13, 2014, 01:51:31 am »
Looked like it was faster than yam on my two junk servers, but slower on the rest

it was also dumping cores everywhere with mmap failing

98
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU miners comparsion
« on: January 13, 2014, 01:16:16 am »
What is "cudapts"?  shrug

I am getting 1750 cpm with gtx 780 +150 core -100 memory on "PtsGPUz0.2ab"

99
Using 512 megabytes of memory per thread
cudaMalloc failed 3!
GT220 sp 48 512M
win7 64

not enough memory

I got mine to 11.6 rounds per second, w/o raising voltage... was like 1600cpm or something.

I have an old 8800gtx, anyone have figures on those?  Wonder if it's worth digging around the storage shed for... they have 768MB of memory  ;)

100
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.7 - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 12, 2014, 03:23:52 am »
that might be what it's supposed to do, but not what it is doing

101
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.7 - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 12, 2014, 02:40:18 am »
how many shares does this miner takes for donation and then starting to mine for me again, because what i can see is that it mines 5 shares for me and then the rest is for developer.
yeah, that's what it looked like to me also.. after leaving it going about 30 minutes

102
1470-1510 cpm,

oh, my gpu usage is beingreported as   80%, vs the 65-70% in arcuda (which gets around 1200-1250 cpm)

103
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit v0.7 - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 12, 2014, 02:02:28 am »
i get ~1250 now, maybe 20 or so higher on avg.  avx still doesn't work, just sse4

ed: i went back to old version, since ypool was reporting my rate as 15 shares/hr, while on the other one it's close to 100 (well, it averages out to around 100, w/ the frequent disconnects)

104
BitShares PTS / Re: arCUDAminer 64 bit - PTS GPU miner for Windows
« on: January 11, 2014, 05:22:27 am »
Launching miner...
Using 1 threads
Using SSE4
Initializing.  Device has -1304317952 free of -1073741824 total bytes of memory
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1248.5714 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1032.0000 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1216.5217 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1245.8065 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1226.1538 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1220.0000 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1237.8571 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 1262.5000 Shares total: 0
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1255.0000 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1228.0000 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1241.3636 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1253.7500 Shares total: 2
collisions/min: 1276.9231 Shares total: 2
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining 20 round for developer
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
Mining rounds for user
collisions/min: 1270.0000 Shares total: 3
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1264.0000 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1248.4375 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1250.5882 Shares total: 3
collisions/min: 1251.6667 Shares total: 3
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1245.5263 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1251.2500 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1250.7143 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1250.9091 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1258.2609 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1260.6250 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1259.8000 Shares total: 4
collisions/min: 1256.7308 Shares total: 4
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining 20 round for developer
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1251.6667 Shares total: 5
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Mining rounds for user
New block data - height: 41191 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1251.7857 Shares total: 6
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1253.4483 Shares total: 7
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1263.5000 Shares total: 8
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1252.0968 Shares total: 10
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1251.2500 Shares total: 11
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 41191)
collisions/min: 1255.9091 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1249.7059 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1243.8571 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1236.2500 Shares total: 13
collisions/min: 1234.7297 Shares total: 13


gpu at 48oC, 50% power

(and does this take like 10% of rounds???)

105
BitShares PTS / Re: digitalocean uhmmmmm...
« on: January 10, 2014, 01:31:27 am »
So I recently decided to cloud mine some Datacoin on digitalocean just to help the fellows along and to see how cloudmining works in the first place. I deposited 10$ through paypal and made myself a droplet. Now I was under the impression that this is a pre-paid service and my droplet would cease to exist when my 10$ funds ran out.

This was, however, not the case. I went for a christmas holiday and all and when I got back I found an email from DO in my inbox asking for 90$ for my December cloud mining (which netted me 0.23 DTC because the miner crashed somewhere in between :) ). It said they couldn't automatically take it from my paypal account. Which I understand since my paypal account is pre-paid and I never gave anyone the permission to do so.

Since DO can't get to my Paypal and Paypal can't for sure get to my bank account (I'm enjoying the fullest of EU customer protection) I figure I have a loophole here. I'm contemplating whether to abuse it.

paypal wouldnt care so much about your c ustomer protection, they'd terminate your account, that is, if digitalocean actually pursued it

$90 isnt enough to make a lawsuit worthwhile at least

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13