Good idea, something like System Delegates, let say there are 20 System Delegates exist and we vote how many of these should be part in top 101 and collects diluted BTS for expensive project funding.

Should we have user issued bitasset child board?

i have to say its pretty hard to keep up with everything here. forums get moved, deleted, coins merged etc. etc.

it would be nice to have a blog that explains every move made. or is there one and i dont see it?

That is true, sometimes it's better to have just one thread just like in bitcointalk, all you have to do is check the OP for the latest updates.

I monitored bts share supply from block 1000483 to 1006079, difference of -78,230.9308 bts
Total new blocks created is 5,596 ^{(1006079 - 1000483)}
Total bts created from 3% of 50bts to 101 delegates = +847,794 bts  ^{(1.5bts * 101 * 5,596 blocks)}
Total fees burned = 926,024.9308 bts  ^{(847,794 + 78,230.9308)}

Is my math correct?


"blockchain_head_block_num": 1000483,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "1 second old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-11-13T17:54:30",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "99.02 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_share_supply": "2,498,169,614.91576 BTS",
 
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 1006079,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "7 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-11-14T09:33:10",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "99.02 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 2,
  "blockchain_share_supply": "2,498,091,383.98496 BTS",

Symbols starting with bit will be banned and all upper case will be enforced.

Too late for this notice, the code should prevent all these.

Suggestion:
Add suffix * on every user issued asset symbols.

Too many rules, these investors are not kids, the community is not the guardian for their investment.

This is good news, the rise of bitcoin also follow the rise of all active crypto coins.