196
General Discussion / Re: The worth of Stan's contribution to BitShares
« on: January 03, 2015, 08:14:59 am »
I'm confused by the reaction. OP asked a legit question in a very professional manner.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
197
General Discussion / Re: Make Functionality of the Full Wallet a Priorty?
« on: December 28, 2014, 04:42:01 am »Thanks I will
You're welcome. I only know this because I listened to it an hour ago.
198
General Discussion / Re: Make Functionality of the Full Wallet a Priorty?
« on: December 28, 2014, 04:37:07 am »
I'd recommend reviewing Bytemaster's latest mumble session, he talked about wallets in detail.
199
General Discussion / Re: Benefits of Becoming a BitShares Gateway
« on: December 28, 2014, 04:14:21 am »
I believe that this was posted to the BM blog on Dec 18th. I assume that BM sent it to Coinbase shortly afterwards.
Be interesting t hear their feedback.
It wasn't clear to me if it was already sent. If so, could we please changed the OP title to CLOSED?
200
General Discussion / Re: Hiring Delegate Request
« on: December 28, 2014, 04:12:33 am »I think Toast was saying that the delegate would be better off just pooling money to hire someone. Hiring someone to find talent doesn't seem very useful. We'd be better off getting 2 delegates put together and have a referral bonus as step 1.
We basically need more infrastructure to maximize value being taken out of the blockchain to hire real talent. And I am not saying $100k a year, but this is a crucial time where we need to ramp up. PC explained the problem quite well. I would suggest anyone read his post in the other thread.
People might consider the idea of caps on these delegates in addition to the idea of 'backpay' but that would be asking an awful lot of anonymous voters.
Even a 5% delegate that handled things like position descriptions, coordinating needs with development and handling Bitcoin conferences would be beneficial. I like the idea of pooling money... anyone coordinating that effort? My case for a delegate.
Too much reliance on hoping somebody runs with it. We saw that approach in marketing and we ultimately saw where that lead us. Just my thought, I'm not married to it one way or another.
201
General Discussion / Re: Hiring Delegate Request
« on: December 28, 2014, 03:31:57 am »I don't think we need a dedicated recruitment delegate. The real problem with finding talent is that we can't offer them a real job anymore! Delegate positions don't cut it and I3 is out of money. We can only do contract work where a payroll delegate can set aside a $$ value.
(I'm happy to continue recruiting - my recruitment history includes vikram, agent86, drltc, and now zach lym for a trial).
First, thank you for your continued push to recruit talent. Kick ass Toast. The second part is inconsistent from what I heard in BM's latest mumble.
-recruitment is our top priority
-we are only using 10 percent of budget
- we need additional development talent
- gateway engineers are needed immediately
-if you need more than 1 delegate, propose it
202
General Discussion / Hiring Delegate Request
« on: December 28, 2014, 03:14:21 am »
I'd love to see a delegate that's focused strictly on bringing in talent to BitShares.
"Our top priority is to recruit talent and getting that talent hired by the Blockchain" - Bytemaster in recent Mumble Session
"Our top priority is to recruit talent and getting that talent hired by the Blockchain" - Bytemaster in recent Mumble Session
203
General Discussion / Re: Introducing BitShares Object Graph
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:35:40 am »It is Public domain
Cheers!
Posted here.
We could use some db experts to help in the thread.
204
General Discussion / BitShares December Newsletter on Bitcointalk * Please give attention
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:20:07 am »205
General Discussion / Re: New BTS client date?
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:16:39 am »What happened was an unexpected security issue and bugs that resulted from the fix. We lost a week there.
What happened is what always does with software.
So before protocol 1.0 is ready we need to fix these security issues, and implement the new UIA rules to allow AML/KYC compliant fiat gateways.
Nothing else, right?
I have the same question. What is the absolute minimum things that need to be finished before we have 1.0?
206
General Discussion / Re: do the api support dividends?
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:15:00 am »But only after 1.0?
Maybe it's just my perception, I'm getting nervious about feature creep. What's the absolute minimum things that need to be done to lock down a 1.0 and get the focus on gateways and lightweight clients?
207
General Discussion / Re: PTS - the insane gift that keeps on giving!
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:13:02 am »
Round and round we go. Would love to see each person make a proposal on how they would like to see it improved moving forward and move on to actually promoting BitShares. Love the passion, would have liked to see more of it when Gamey posted his taskforces.
208
General Discussion / Re: NuBits
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:09:06 am »Since i have found nubits i can sleep again. i have 50 % btc and 50 % nubits and it's always the same in usd. and if btc is rising or falling like an idiot so i sell or by some btc or nubits. And it works. Hope both btc and nubits live long.
Too much time wasted in this community worrying about other villages. I wish Nubits all the best, my focus is BTS and bitUSD.
209
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD onramp
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:06:54 am »
Already in progress.
Gateway Discussion
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12050.0
CCEDK Onramp
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12677.0
Gateway Discussion
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12050.0
CCEDK Onramp
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12677.0
210
General Discussion / Re: Benefits of Becoming a BitShares Gateway
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:05:31 am »
Any additional thoughts? This is such an important topic as we reach out to different gateways.
