Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
here here
Change the name to Exchange instead of Wallet.
Integrate bitcoin and altcoins gateway
Then let's promote to crypto world as a web decentralize exchange, instead of just web wallet.
Just my
maybe setting up a delegate to give support via skype. this delegate would be always or most part of the time, available to help people with technical stuff. could even make skype sessions. people could apply on a thread and the delegate would schedule each session. kinda like a call center but since the delegate probably won't have multiple people working for him (at least for now), instead of people calling up via skype, he could schedule each session. basically his job would be constantly helping people out on the Technical forum section and doing those sessions on skype.
This is the wrong approach. The reason we feel the need for something like this so badly is because the client needs to be more usable. I'd much rather put time and money into usability than customer support.
We need to strike at the roots, not hack at the leaves.
maybe setting up a delegate to give support via skype. this delegate would be always or most part of the time, available to help people with technical stuff. could even make skype sessions. people could apply on a thread and the delegate would schedule each session. kinda like a call center but since the delegate probably won't have multiple people working for him (at least for now), instead of people calling up via skype, he could schedule each session. basically his job would be constantly helping people out on the Technical forum section and doing those sessions on skype.
QuoteWe are preparing for the withdrawals. CNY, USD and NXT withdrawals will be handled first.
No mention of BTS, and add to that the confusion of snapshots/vested balances.
I hope any of our dev is trying to get in touch.
While it's nice to see some activity, there's still the nagging issue of low developer transparency. Too many of us feel completely out of the loop as to what developments are taking place, who's working on what, where we're headed, and what our timelines are. These details are important to secure investor confidence.
That is a problem with a very simple solution. In fact bytemaster himself has been exemplifying this strategy ever since it was made available to him (over one year ago now).
They only have to show up and I organize everything else. ..
So tell me, when something is so easy and freely available. ..why is it underutilized? Is it not obvious that communication and teamwork are what we need most?
I agree, the mumbles are a great way to get everyone communicating. Too bad they're always during work time for me, or maybe I'd try popping in sometime.
I have a feeling tomorrow's mumble will be interesting...That's not easy for common user to participate .
It need to be some sort of standard operation , like diagram , project management flow chart ...etc .
Lack of that lead to the misunderstanding of low-transparency . In fact many documents are not available .
Agreed. An easy to see, frequently updated reference piece with concrete details and precise plans is what investors want to see.
I'm tired of trying to convince this community that having a customer base is critical or that the best time to acquire a business is when it's on the verge of failure. Dilution has been abused for all the wrong reasons but it won't be allowed for a good reason. Delegates are abused for all sorts of superficial matters but it won't be allocated to meaningful business moves like acquiring a customer base.
This the the second proposal I make that goes nowhere due to a total lack of perspective here. I proposed bridging Ripple to Bitshares to bring in liquidity and would have happily developed it myself but was opposed with libertarian rethoric that Ripple is centralized and bank friendly and therefore evil (nevermind the liquidity). Now people seem unable to see beyond the superficial of a failed exchange to look at its assets (nevermind the customer base, the liquidity, the ecosystem and the infrastructure).
This community really lacks business accumen and seems content maintaining the status quo. So be it. I wish you people all the best.
Klosure..Noone said not to do it. In fact I said Do It! (Not that my opinion should matter if you intently disagree.
It does not sound like you are here wanting to take the risk though. ..
It feels more like you are expecting everyone to be 100% for this. It isn't going to happen...if that is what you are waiting for.
Yes you said do it, and you said many other things also. So what?
Are you post this to claim Klosure is not capable of understanding your point?
Oh, please stop to post like this to HURT Klosure even more.
My respect to Klosure and to many Klosures in the past.
I am not sure what you mean. Would you like to join me in mumble for a few?
My point is perhaps communicate skills. I'm with you on many many issues fuzzy, even on this buyout one. But often you are a bit offensive and a bit lack of respect of others. actually maybe it's the whole community "problem". I'm a little picky on you, because I have high expectation on you. Sorry for confusion。
Wall street bailouts led to the biggest rally in the us stock market in history... I know many of you are zero hedge tinfoil hat people and think it's rigged, but you are rich if you bought stocks when the banks were bailed out.
Wrong. You would be rich if you had bought bitcoin when the banks were bailed out. You would not have even tripled your money in stocks. Google the greatest stock market rallies in history. This one is not it.
Not here to argue what the greatest investment in the world was from 2008 onward... Just saying the bailouts led to a huge rally in stocks and maybe a bailout here would lead to a similar result.
Well I will down vote a bailout delegate and I am sure others will to.
Exactly, we can always do that.
来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk
I haven't looked too in-depth at voting, but I thought the rules were that you could only "approve" a delegate that you like, and it wasn't possible to "downvote" delegates you don't agree with...?
But yea, it's fairly obvious a delegate specifically for this wouldn't gain very wide approval. But that's the beauty of BitShares -- the delegate can be made and the shareholders can come to a consensus with their voting power. If the widespread consensus is against any kind of bailout, that will be shown through votes. Sounds fair to me.
This community really lacks business accumen and seems content maintaining the status quo. So be it. I wish you people all the best.
