Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dritz3r

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
31
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: MUSE Light client Release
« on: October 27, 2015, 02:56:26 pm »
I found out that I only have problem with white screen when uploading keys downloaded from https://wallet.bitshares.org.
Keys from regular (full desktop) wallet is OK.

I imported the same .json file in Bitshare 2.0 Light client without problem.

32
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: MUSE Light client Release
« on: October 27, 2015, 01:30:59 pm »
I found out that I only have problem with white screen when uploading keys downloaded from https://wallet.bitshares.org.
Keys from regular (full desktop) wallet is OK.

33
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: cob, are you ready for tomorrow's go live?????:'( :'(
« on: October 27, 2015, 01:12:37 pm »
I found out that I only have problem with white screen when uploading keys downloaded from https://wallet.bitshares.org.
Keys from regular (full desktop) wallet is OK.

34
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: cob, are you ready for tomorrow's go live?????:'( :'(
« on: October 27, 2015, 04:53:39 am »
White screen on both Win and Linux.


35
My bet is on the first day.

Bitshares technology without fraud. I think MUSE is only project in BTS space which retains value from the Bitshares beginnings. As BTS investor (trough AGS) I will strongly support MUSE. I'am already in talk with some huge band in my country and  composer of new to be announce rock opera. Maybe that opera will be MUSE exclusive.

I adding additional 2,000 BTS for that prize.

36
As post 28/2 AGS holder I can only say that you got what you deserve. More Brownie points for everybody! With foundation on fraud what did you expect?

37
IDentabit / Re: John Underwood Visit
« on: September 08, 2015, 10:29:30 am »
@underwun

I'am also impressed with Dan's achievement.

He is sharedropping the new coins to themselves and dumping the old coins on the new suckers. I invested in BTS development trough AGS so I can tell you from my own experience. First it was the Protoshares holders, then the Angelshare holders, then the Bitshares holders and now the Brownie holders. Who know what is next? IDentabit holders.

Can you imagine yourself in their position? Best of all they have two type of AGS holder.

Are you sure there are your only option? Have you thought about alternatives?

Good luck with your project.


38
IDentabit / Re: is Brownie.PTS being used as an IDentabit sharedrop target
« on: September 07, 2015, 07:45:42 pm »
Thanks for compleeting my quick explanation  ;).

About the brownies sharedrop, I think it's not a good thing to annnounce a % sharedrop on brownies and then change it. It may irritate some people ...


Endless disappointment. They do that to me and other post 28/2 investor in AGS. They will do that again. It no longer makes sense. BTS is more centralized than anything in crypto-space.

39
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: September 06, 2015, 01:42:16 pm »
We, of course, invested heavily in AGS as did many of our close relatives and friends, so self-interest, not just duty, motivated us to do right by AGSers.  Makeing sure AGS and PTS got treated fairly was the entire reason they merged into BitShares and BitShares was made our new recommended sharedrop target.  (Plus they also got extra BTS just like pre 2/28/14 donors.) Thus, they ARE effectively liquid (when vesting ends).   We wanted to make sure their holders got stakes in everything we do.  All square.


:)

Thank you for your answer. I still can't understand how 'pre' and 'after' 2/28/14  investors are equal as sharedrop target. 'Pre' investors are bought BTSX. 'Post' investor  every other DACs after that.  I don't have problem with my share in BTS(X) I have problem with my position as sharedrop target. As 'post' investor I didn't recived as much BTS as 'pre' investor so I'am much smaller sharedrop target. You changed course after you received our money and proclaimd BTS as new sharedrop target. That is simply not fair against 'post' investor or something I'm not well understood. I don't doubt that you and your family didn't invested heavily in AGS, but problem is that now we have two type od AGS investor.

 
AGS is not III.
 
AGS is a large community of people with a demonstrated willingness to give money to develop this industry.  It is the absolutely BEST select group of individuals in the whole wide world for a DAC developer to be courting.

40
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: September 06, 2015, 10:45:31 am »
I own AGS and the only reason I invested in BTS is to become the target of future sharedrops. That was the promise from Dan and Stan. AGS buyer had special place in their posts at that time. Now some 'mumble' listener  or Forum member with BROWNIE.PTS have bigger share in future DACs. I invested xx BTC when price was 600USD.  As post 28/2 investor I only received BTS dust and the worst thing is that most of them are still locked. We even did't have chance to sell AGS. Remember you returned PTS which was also the currency for buying AGS.

Dan and Stan is that all. Is that your final decision that Brownie.PTS worth more than AGS. Please answer me I'am really disappointed.

41
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 22, 2015, 01:10:18 pm »
He will fool you every time.

Early investor

42
General Discussion / Re: Please stop changing the rules of the game
« on: August 22, 2015, 12:35:11 pm »


However, with the advent of AngelShares we have a new obligation to do all we can to motivate 3rd Parties to honor those who built the ecosystem they are enjoying.  Our promise to promote, support and endorse only those 3rd Party DACs that honor our stakeholder's contributions is an important benefit that 3rd Party developer's get for honoring the Social Consensus.  To dilute that for future DACs would be counterproductive and contrary to the expanded Social Consensus developed in December.  This is being codified further in the Social Consensus Software License (SCSL) bounty.

43
General Discussion / Re: Maker sharedrop on the BitShares community
« on: August 22, 2015, 11:38:32 am »
No one got to sell their AGS.
Plus .. there is not a single AGS *investor* .. not a single one!!

If you dont know what I mean you should have never payed into the AGS address(es)

Yes I know what you mean. I bought AGS to invest in development of BTS and become part of all those beautiful autonomous companies. That was the promise if I remember correctly. What is left from that promise?
No promises are associated with AGS!
and still you received BTS .. didnt you?

But why. I was invited and my BTC with other 'promise'. Maybe I didn't want BTSX, now BTS. No, I didn't received BTS, at least not all. PTS was returned to investor, why not BTC? Where is the difference. A-ha PTS don't worth anything anymore. If I wait enough maybe Dan will return BTC :). Common guys you know well that you can't cheat your investors and expect trust. In crypto trust is all you have. Did you ask yourself what you have besides lots of broken promises or social contract as you call that.

44
General Discussion / Re: Maker sharedrop on the BitShares community
« on: August 22, 2015, 10:16:16 am »
No one got to sell their AGS.
Plus .. there is not a single AGS *investor* .. not a single one!!

If you dont know what I mean you should have never payed into the AGS address(es)

Yes I know what you mean. I bought AGS to invest in development of BTS and become part of all those beautiful autonomous companies. That was the promise if I remember correctly. What is left from that promise?

45
BitShares is centralized way from Dan and Stan to steal money.

P.S. I'am not a troll. That is exactly my experience.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5