Imo it was john nash

Its pretty easy especially when there is no blockchain involved

Quote from: lil_jay890 on December 03, 2015, 12:26:18 pm

Quote from: Thom on December 03, 2015, 05:36:27 am

Quote from: lil_jay890 on December 03, 2015, 04:19:26 am

Wow somebody was paid to deliver something for bitshares and it turned out to be some half assed attempt that never came close to what was promised?!?!

Inconceivable!!

What the hell are you talking about? It was exactly what was promised, the first precious metal off-ramp for BitShares. jsidhu probably still has access to the code. Too bad nobody wanted to buy any PM from it.

Actually, in retrospect, probably it was a good thing they didn't seeing as they might have also been victimized. I came pretty close to being one of them.

My mistake. I didn't know you could actually use the service.  What is stopping someone else from opening the business again under a different name?  Is all the work that was done lost?

I don't think so, at least not the website and store shopping cart. However b/c of the radical changes of BitShares 2.0 the backend interface to would have to be totally rewritten. There isn't a single storefront or shopping cart that survived the transition from BitShares 1.0 to 2.0, and there was no advanced notice to the community about it so they could prepare. If that ever happens again it would probably be the death of the BitShares brand. IMO the transition was poorly handled.

I think bitshares team had hoped the price would rise and developers would come clammering back asking them how to integrate again, we know they are busy but there is the right way to do it and the right way to do it, the code is only 25% of the work and teams in crypto are learning the hard way that its not always about code.

He hasn't answered any of our attempts to contact him.

Perhaps one of you would like to try?

Ryan Mechalske
89 Lion Drive
Hanover, PA  17331-3849

Didnt he move?

for ACCT with BTC you'd need and expiration of withdraw rights ... locktimeverify does the otherway round .. you can only withdraw AFTER "expiration"

I think tier nolan described how it may be possible in that thread

Anyone else notice how the BTS price seems to follow BTC on BTC38? BTC starts dropping and BTS dumps follow. When BTC was rising the past couple weeks ago, BTS was only available on Polo, where it was dumped to hell from sellers riding the BTC wave.

Curious if we would've gone up with BTC if only BTC38 had BTS 2.0 working at the time...

Yes 

Quote from: jsidhu on November 16, 2015, 04:46:55 am

Quote from: merockstar on November 15, 2015, 09:07:08 pm

I just ate some losses and balanced my holdings a bit more towards bitcoin.

This almost certainly means BTC price is about the fall, resulting in BTS/BTC price going up. You heard it here first.

When btc falls bts usually falls faster

i think bts has gained a little bit of independence. overall the trend will be the same but short-medium term i think if btc keeps going back to what we've been seeing the fiat price of bts will hold. I base that on nothing but guessing, but I feel like there's a lot of bitshares people who don't really back bitcoin anymore the way they might have before 2.0- maybe i am being too optimistic.

Too optimistic..i'd like to see the proposed features for bts2.0 all working first.

central server clearing.. so nope