181
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特资产改善讨论方案：BTA3.0
« on: April 25, 2015, 07:34:31 am »
我回复了，个人觉得还是不够好，千万不能按照这个执行。
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
182
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 哪位兄弟送一个BTS注册网络钱包吧！
« on: April 25, 2015, 07:32:48 am »
钱包里面不是可以直接注册么，有赞助的，直接跟着注册流程走就好了。
183
General Discussion / Re: I think BITASSETs 3.0 will not work (original post are too long)
« on: April 25, 2015, 07:14:58 am »
the longs and shorts are two sides of the market.
we should keep them in balance, so the market can run very long time.
Now in BitAsset, the BTA shorters have an expiring date, but the BTA holders have not. This means holding BTA have advantage than holding BTS（or the bts collateral）. So the BTA holders are winner, and BTS price is falling all the way.
In BitAsset 3.0, there is no solid time limit for BTA shorter too. But BTA holders have another advantage: can settle back BTS whenever they want. This leads to the same result as now.
And the settlement makes BTA not currencies any more. If we want to create BTA as currencies, then we just need to let BTA can buy BTS whenever they want.
What you called settlement seems not basic function of currencies, but some kind of bond. Correc me if I make mistakes.
EDIT PLUS:
For a healthy market:
if market mainly want to sell, sellers need place lower price orders to match buyers'.This leads the price to go down.
if market mainly want to buy, buyers need place higher price orders to match sellers'. This leads the price to go up.
In BitAsset 3.0, the settlement function make the market do not work normally. Hold BitAsset to get BTS, will not leads BTS price go up, but Hold BTS to get BitAsset leads BTS price to go down.
I suggest we need more consideration. Maybe just cancel the short orders time limit and make shorts can cover whenever they want and at what amount they want, and market will do the rest. （except bad collateralized shorts）
we should keep them in balance, so the market can run very long time.
Now in BitAsset, the BTA shorters have an expiring date, but the BTA holders have not. This means holding BTA have advantage than holding BTS（or the bts collateral）. So the BTA holders are winner, and BTS price is falling all the way.
In BitAsset 3.0, there is no solid time limit for BTA shorter too. But BTA holders have another advantage: can settle back BTS whenever they want. This leads to the same result as now.
And the settlement makes BTA not currencies any more. If we want to create BTA as currencies, then we just need to let BTA can buy BTS whenever they want.
What you called settlement seems not basic function of currencies, but some kind of bond. Correc me if I make mistakes.
EDIT PLUS:
For a healthy market:
if market mainly want to sell, sellers need place lower price orders to match buyers'.This leads the price to go down.
if market mainly want to buy, buyers need place higher price orders to match sellers'. This leads the price to go up.
In BitAsset 3.0, the settlement function make the market do not work normally. Hold BitAsset to get BTS, will not leads BTS price go up, but Hold BTS to get BitAsset leads BTS price to go down.
I suggest we need more consideration. Maybe just cancel the short orders time limit and make shorts can cover whenever they want and at what amount they want, and market will do the rest. （except bad collateralized shorts）
184
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 25, 2015, 06:58:45 am »
the longs and shorts are two sides of the market.
we should keep them in balance, so the market can run very long time.
Now in BitAsset, the BTA shorters have an expiring date, but the BTA holders have not. This means holding BTA have advantage than holding BTS（or the bts collateral）. So the BTA holders are winner, and BTS price is falling all the way.
In BitAsset 3.0, there is no solid time limit for BTA shorter too. But BTA holders have another advantage: can settle back BTS whenever they want.
And the settlement makes BTA not currencies any more. If we want to create BTA as currencies, then we just need to let BTA can buy BTS whenever they want.
What you called settlement seems not basic function of currencies, but some kind of bond. Correc me if I make mistakes.
EDIT PLUS:
For a healthy market:
if market mainly want to sell, sellers need place lower price orders to match buyers'.This leads the price to go down.
if market mainly want to buy, buyers need place higher price orders to match sellers'. This leads the price to go up.
In BitAsset 3.0, the settlement function make the market do not work normally. Hold BitAsset to get BTS, will not leads BTS price go up, but Hold BTS to get BitAsset leads BTS price to go down.
I suggest we need more consideration. Maybe just cancel the shorts time limit is enough, and market will do the rest.
we should keep them in balance, so the market can run very long time.
Now in BitAsset, the BTA shorters have an expiring date, but the BTA holders have not. This means holding BTA have advantage than holding BTS（or the bts collateral）. So the BTA holders are winner, and BTS price is falling all the way.
In BitAsset 3.0, there is no solid time limit for BTA shorter too. But BTA holders have another advantage: can settle back BTS whenever they want.
And the settlement makes BTA not currencies any more. If we want to create BTA as currencies, then we just need to let BTA can buy BTS whenever they want.
What you called settlement seems not basic function of currencies, but some kind of bond. Correc me if I make mistakes.
EDIT PLUS:
For a healthy market:
if market mainly want to sell, sellers need place lower price orders to match buyers'.This leads the price to go down.
if market mainly want to buy, buyers need place higher price orders to match sellers'. This leads the price to go up.
In BitAsset 3.0, the settlement function make the market do not work normally. Hold BitAsset to get BTS, will not leads BTS price go up, but Hold BTS to get BitAsset leads BTS price to go down.
I suggest we need more consideration. Maybe just cancel the shorts time limit is enough, and market will do the rest.
185
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 3.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 25, 2015, 12:20:52 am »
It seems people have to sell bts for bitasset, but they need not to buy bts when they need bts. So the market will face sell presure, but no buy presure. This will drive the bts price all way down. Correct me, if i misunderstand something.
186
General Discussion / Re: Why BitShares isn't Taking off and What we are doing about it.
« on: April 22, 2015, 12:03:36 pm »
People need digital currency, but they do not need it like this.
It is like in the green energy area, many company died, not because they do not need green energy, but because they just need something to solve a specific problem. Tesla is an example.
In this aspect, ripple do beeter than any other crypo.
It is like in the green energy area, many company died, not because they do not need green energy, but because they just need something to solve a specific problem. Tesla is an example.
In this aspect, ripple do beeter than any other crypo.
187
General Discussion / Re: Why BitShares isn't Taking off and What we are doing about it.
« on: April 22, 2015, 11:43:47 am »
You should read a book called: zero to one
188
General Discussion / Re: New DEX exchange ANN
« on: April 22, 2015, 03:17:07 am »
it seems they are closer to success than us, we need hurry up.
Their product Nubits seems solving the liquid and stable problem very good for now.
Their product Nubits seems solving the liquid and stable problem very good for now.
189
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 网页钱包——bts.yuyin365.com——欢迎大家测试
« on: April 18, 2015, 11:04:10 am »
必须要用某种形式在网上存一份加密的密钥，不要我换台电脑脑密码就不能用了。
密码不存到服务器，这样才安全，各个地方的脑钱包导出后，再导入其他网站就可以了。都是存在本地。密码是共享的吗？比如我在官方登录了，可以用相同的脑钱包在你这里登录吗？
190
General Discussion / Re: What about the decentralized forum DAC?
« on: April 18, 2015, 11:01:08 am »
good idea, but seems useless. Who really care a forum is decentralized? What they care is not this.
192
General Discussion / Re: PLEASE VOTE DOWN: User toast has moved to the MUSIC project
« on: April 17, 2015, 10:25:49 pm »
this is the disadvantage of decentralized fund, not so effient.
193
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 网页钱包——bts.yuyin365.com——欢迎大家测试
« on: April 17, 2015, 11:37:38 am »
密码是共享的吗？比如我在官方登录了，可以用相同的脑钱包在你这里登录吗？
194
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 2.0 - For Community Review
« on: April 16, 2015, 03:53:06 pm »
why not just cancel the short peroid, so people can buy back as they wish if it is not explosed.
195
General Discussion / Re: Ripple's gettin ripped
« on: April 15, 2015, 04:19:10 pm »
I think this may be not a bad feature.
