91
General Discussion / Re: TRADE.BTC and TRADE.LTC are up and running
« on: October 17, 2015, 10:23:26 am »
I can not create my deposit address for trade.BTC or trade.LTC.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
92
General Discussion / Re: What happened to Moonstone.io?
« on: October 17, 2015, 10:12:59 am »
when will the moonstone wallet out?
Or is it alive?
Or is it alive?
93
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DACPLAY team 提供BTS2 API服务器，速度超快！
« on: October 17, 2015, 08:30:18 am »
轻钱包+play的服务器
94
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DACPLAY team 提供BTS2 API服务器，速度超快！
« on: October 17, 2015, 08:02:35 am »
的确要快很多！
95
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Lets vote for lower fees!
« on: October 17, 2015, 02:20:11 am »
we should lower the transacion , place/cancel order fee.
Lower the transaction fee, fee for place/cancel orders. This makes strong and deep order book. I have plenty of experience trade in nxt DEX. Because the market is not deep and my order may not make a deal, I feel lost something to place an order. So I am willing to pay tens times of fee to trade on centered exchange.
We should increase the fee when trade success.
Increase trade fee rate to 0.05%(more or less). So a average 20000 bts order will create 20 bts profit.
Why? Because of a simple research result: both side of a trade feel themself is winner, when they trade totally freely. In this situation, people are willing to pay more.
(I have many experice in this, that i am willing to pay hundreds of bts to central exchanges as fee, when i feel making a good deal. Even 0.5% fee rate is not high for me in this case)
Lower the transaction fee, fee for place/cancel orders. This makes strong and deep order book. I have plenty of experience trade in nxt DEX. Because the market is not deep and my order may not make a deal, I feel lost something to place an order. So I am willing to pay tens times of fee to trade on centered exchange.
We should increase the fee when trade success.
Increase trade fee rate to 0.05%(more or less). So a average 20000 bts order will create 20 bts profit.
Why? Because of a simple research result: both side of a trade feel themself is winner, when they trade totally freely. In this situation, people are willing to pay more.
(I have many experice in this, that i am willing to pay hundreds of bts to central exchanges as fee, when i feel making a good deal. Even 0.5% fee rate is not high for me in this case)
96
General Discussion / Re: Am I the only one that thinks referral system is Bitshares largest mistake ever?
« on: October 17, 2015, 01:47:38 am »I think the referral system is good. I also think we should increase the fee, but we should be more clever to do it:I disagree with reducing fees for two main reasons:
1) It makes the referral program a lot less interesting if you dont expect the users you bring in to generate much of any fees. So then it will fail.
2) A big reason why the BTS price has been trending down for a year is that the supply is increasing, that is, the blockchain is operating at a loss instead of being profitable. As soon as we can demonstrate a blockchain making a profit over a reasonable period of time, even a small profit, it will attract a lot of attention. Everyone is used to inflating blockchains that hemmorhage money (through PoW or whatever), but if you change that around and are actually making a profit, then a lot of investors will want to jump on board. And helping the price break its downtrend is going to help adopting a LOT, because a major inhibitor to adoption right now is that everyone who buys in loses money and gets disillusioned.
If we could advertise ourselves as being profitable more people would join in as holders.
Would it be good to have something display the number of bitshares being burnt per day? or if we are operating at a profit or at loss? It sounds nice while we're operating at profit, but at a loss it seems it could create some psychological panic, I dunno. But showing the fees burnt per day or month would be nice I guess
Lower the transaction fee, fee for place/cancel orders. This makes strong and deep order book.
Increase trade fee rate to 0.0005(more or less) when order success. So a average 20000 bts order will create 20 bts profit. Why? Because of a simple research result: both side of a trade feel themself is winner, when they trade totally freely. In this situation, people are willing to pay more.
(I have many experice in this, that i am willing to pay hundreds of bts to central exchanges as fee when i feel making a good deal. 0.005 fee rate is not high for me in this case). We have plenty of knowledge to learn from the central exchange.
97
General Discussion / Re: Am I the only one that thinks referral system is Bitshares largest mistake ever?
« on: October 17, 2015, 01:31:34 am »I think the fee for placing/cancel of an order and transaction should be very cheap. But the fee for trade success should be more, such as 0.0005 of the liquild.
People are willing to pay when trade success, because both seller and buyer feel earn something at the moment they trade.
I think that the current market fee should be split into maker fee and taker fee. So we have order placing fee, cancel fee, maker fee and taker fee where [maker fee percentage]+[taker fee percentage] >= 0. The order placing/cancel fee should be as low as possible just to avoid spamming. To improve the liquidity, we can set the maker fee to -0.2% and taker fee to 0.2%, or maybe -0.1% and 0.2% to get some profit from trades like normal exchanges.
The fee to place an order is high, I am unwilling to place an order, because the order may not make a deal. Lower the fee, can attract more people place order to make a stronger and deeper order book.
I have plenty of experience that i am willing pay houndreds of bts fee to trade in the centered exchange, because of the market deep. I feel i made a good deal, so even 0.5 percent is not high for me.
98
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DACPLAY team 提供BTS2 API服务器，速度超快！
« on: October 16, 2015, 03:55:51 pm »
明天我试试，多谢～
99
General Discussion / Re: Am I the only one that thinks referral system is Bitshares largest mistake ever?
« on: October 16, 2015, 03:52:47 pm »
I think the fee for placing/cancel of an order and transaction should be very cheap. But the fee for trade success should be more, such as 0.0005 of the liquild.
People are willing to pay when trade success, because both seller and buyer feel earn something at the moment they trade.
People are willing to pay when trade success, because both seller and buyer feel earn something at the moment they trade.
100
General Discussion / Re: Can't check the market in the 2.0 webwallet
« on: October 16, 2015, 03:13:21 pm »
It finally is out after wait a moment. I think the site lack a simple loading sign.
When I open a page without any result, I just close it.
When I open a page without any result, I just close it.
101
General Discussion / Can't check the market in the 2.0 webwallet
« on: October 16, 2015, 02:53:47 pm »
I use Chrome, and I can login and check balance and pay. But the market page, block chain page, witness page is always empty,.
https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/markets
what explorer work better? Thanks
https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/markets
what explorer work better? Thanks
102
Openledger / Re: Articles and links on OpenLedger - will be updated when news arrive
« on: October 15, 2015, 12:43:25 pm »
The news are good. And i think the webwallet need to be made more smooth.
103
General Discussion / Re: No Liquidity. Add shapeshifts BTC to BitBTC to the client.
« on: October 15, 2015, 12:18:20 pm »
not that simple. There are also some other point need to oprimise to attract people to use it, such as make trade smooth, good price and volume.
104
General Discussion / Re: When we will see BTC/BTS parity?
« on: October 15, 2015, 12:19:23 am »
It is a joke, if this can be true it will be tens of years later.
This is not about tech, just about trust. Bts get parity trust, and then will be parity price.
This is not about tech, just about trust. Bts get parity trust, and then will be parity price.
105
General Discussion / Re: Is it possible that some exhanges was not informed about the bts snapshot?
« on: October 14, 2015, 11:55:39 pm »
I can not imagine this can be true! If this is a company not a community, we can do better.
