76
General Discussion / Re: Introducing Cryptonomex International (CNI)
« on: February 24, 2016, 05:13:48 am »
great to hear!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think option b would probably be best.
I vote for B should we import our bitshares2.0 wallet just wondering
I think blockchain.info has a technique to at least verify that the deliverd js files match a checksum/hash@xeroc would you suggest just having a git fork that includes the changes to the wallet files? Is there a way to have a cryptographic signature that could be checked by the end user?
@xeroc @puppies I gave it a try and committed the UI changes here: https://github.com/merivercap/bitshares-2-ui
Thanks!
I already have 2 dead bitshares wallets app on my phone. Are you a competitor with @kenCode APP, or are you working together?
So I guess you really know what is "Lifetime referrer"?QuoteIt would be great to have a generous allocation for the referral program and wanted your vote and feedback. The referral program currently gives 20% to the network and 30% to lifetime members. We get to decide the remaining 50% between referrers (annual/lifetime members) and our faucet/registrar. For example we can have 10% of referral revenue go to the faucet, then 40% will go to annual/lifetime members, an additional 30% would go to the lifetime member, and 20% would go to the network.
It would be great to have everyone one of us and our supporters well-rewarded for spreading the word! Here are the allocation options to vote on:
A) 20% faucet / 30% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
B) 10% faucet / 40% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
C) 5% faucet / 45% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
D) 0% faucet / 50% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
E) Other, please explain
Not sure if I understand correctly the difference between
"faucet", "annual/lifetime member" and "lifetime". The faucet is usually
called "registrar" because it pays the registration fee. One of the
other both is usually called "Lifetime Referrer" and the other is called
Affiliate Referrer.
If
- "annual/lifetime member" = affiliate referrer"
- "lifetime" = Lifetime referer
then I vote for option "B".
It's very confusable imo.
Basically,
* if you're a lifetime member and you referred a new user, you're the lifetime referrer of the new user;
* if you're a annual subscriber and you referred a new user, your lifetime referrer will be the lifetime referrer of the new user.
@xeroc would you suggest just having a git fork that includes the changes to the wallet files? Is there a way to have a cryptographic signature that could be checked by the end user?
Note: We don't plan to open the faucet up for new accounts yet, but feel free to import keys if you want to use the wallet. It's the same as OL just with different colors.
Don't get me wrong, but I would recommend to not simply import your
private keys here unless you publish the sources as well as the
deployed code. Then people can compare with the original code and see
you didn't tamper with it. I am sure you understand that!
This is not an issue particular to bitcash, but we might need to find a
way to show to users that their keys do not leave their browsers. Not
sure how to do that though (@jcalfee1, @svk ??)
QuoteIt would be great to have a generous allocation for the referral program and wanted your vote and feedback. The referral program currently gives 20% to the network and 30% to lifetime members. We get to decide the remaining 50% between referrers (annual/lifetime members) and our faucet/registrar. For example we can have 10% of referral revenue go to the faucet, then 40% will go to annual/lifetime members, an additional 30% would go to the lifetime member, and 20% would go to the network.
It would be great to have everyone one of us and our supporters well-rewarded for spreading the word! Here are the allocation options to vote on:
A) 20% faucet / 30% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
B) 10% faucet / 40% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
C) 5% faucet / 45% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
D) 0% faucet / 50% annual/lifetime member / 30% lifetime / 20% network
E) Other, please explain
Not sure if I understand correctly the difference between
"faucet", "annual/lifetime member" and "lifetime". The faucet is usually
called "registrar" because it pays the registration fee. One of the
other both is usually called "Lifetime Referrer" and the other is called
Affiliate Referrer.
If
- "annual/lifetime member" = affiliate referrer"
- "lifetime" = Lifetime referer
then I vote for option "B".
QuoteI don't mind having 0% for the faucet, but in general our faucet has to manage spam and there is a possibility that people might create lifetime member farms that create many membership accounts so it may be safer to allocate some referral revenue to the faucet to prevent abuse. Right now it takes about 95 BTS to open new accounts, 4,000 BTS for an annual membership, 20,000 BTS for a lifetime membership. Allocating 5% for the faucet will give it 200 BTS if a referral upgrades to an annual membership, enough to cover two account creations.Would you faucet allow registration of premium names? Why would the
faucet care about annual or lifetime fees? Would YOU pay for those
upgrades?