Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Samupaha

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 32
106
General Discussion / Re: Marketing plan for Bitshares 2.1
« on: March 06, 2016, 02:34:57 pm »
If you need any assistance with marketing, please don't hesitate to contact CNX about it. The whole purpose of Cryptonomex International is to have a means of coordinating exactly those efforts, however, focusing on the CNX AND BTS side of things, not merely on BTS.

What's the best way to contact? I'd rather do it here on the forum so that everybody else can keep up what's happening. So far very little results.

I think, BitShares needs to figure out a way to have someone take "the lead" without giving the impression to dictate things. CNX tried to play that role and people complained. Now they are not longer taking that role and no one else stands up to take the lead .. yet ..

I think we have seen already enough and can say that Bytemaster/Cryptonomex-haters were just full of bullshit and we don't need to take them seriously. If Cryptonomex has any resources for marketing, they can take more responsibility for it. It has been clearly too early to let Bitshares handle it's own marketing in a decentralized way – it doesn't work because there is no accumulated knowledge how to do it.

Without talking bad about other projects, this is exactly what I don't like about Ethereum (among other things) .. They claim to be a decentralized network and still consensys defined and decides almost everything on its own. They seem to be quite successful with that approach though ..

Usually centralized way is more effective. Decentralization is not a panacea that will make everything better. It's great at increasing resilience and antifragility of a system, but it has also costs.

Would there be anyone interested in running a marketing campaign?
We could create a committee-owned account for referrals and then pay a marketeer via worker.
If he succeeds we get the referrals and if he doesn't manage to bring in a certain number of new users every month (including nr transaction generated by them), we could simply fire him.

Let's just try simple things first, like I'm doing in this topic. I'm going to start a marketing campaign with my own resources, and everybody is welcome to join me.

I'll focus on high quality early adopters. People who will get really excited about Bitshares and want to do something for it, like development or marketing. Or at least they'll see BTS as a good long term investment. This does not necessarily manifest as hundreds of new accounts, at least in the short term. We don't need people to open account and forget it after two days because they didn't see anything interesting. We need people who understand how great and powerful system Bitshares is and are willing to do something for it.

Other people can focus on other groups, like traders.

If somebody doesn't want to do anything, that's ok.

But we still need a little bit of cooperation:
- Decide what we are campaigning for (in this case: 2.1 with stealth and free transactions)
- Know when it will happen (when the hardforks are coming?)

107
1) USD/BTS + CNY/BTS = USD/CNY
2) USD/BTS + EUR/BTS = USD/EUR
3) BTC/BTS + USD/BTS = BTC/USD
4) BTC/BTS + CNY/BTS = BTC/CNY

the first 2 or the last 2?
if we use USD/BTS for USD/CNY as the first case and for BTC/USD as the third case, wouldn't we be messing things up?
We should decide what Synthetic order books to create/combined order books
I think it's best if we first know what Combined Order Books we need the most, and from there build the Synthetic Order Books as seen on the picture
So I would guess the last two markets (BTC/USD and BTC/CNY) make more sense for the general trading population, meaning we should get BTC/USD + BTS/USD and join them creating a Synthetic Order Book (BTC/USD) which we would then merge with the Direct Order Book BTC/USD and do the same for CNY

+

Bitcoin Side Chain

=

Combo Break!

I'd go for the first two. If we are going to make a Bitcoin sidechain, that will lead to diminishing demand for bitBTC so it doesn't make much sense to invest on that. And on the other hand, fiat-pegged currencies on the blockchain are one of our biggest strengths and they should be supported always when possible.

What? Imo that doesn't make much sense. If we want a Bitcoin sidechain, the way to support it is doing the last two, because that way we have fiat supporting BTC right? With the first two we are only supporting fiat and not Bitcoin, which doesn't really make sense if we make a sidechain because theoretically bitcoin pairs should have the most volume
Btw, I did that last night and now I noticed the last two pairs didn't make sense. I mixed Synthetic and Combined Order Books, my bad! Maybe that made you think that way.

And when I say BTC, in this case I mean SIDE.BTC if we ever do the sidechain thing.

Ahh, I thought you meant bitBTC because you left "bit" out of other currencies as well.

But anyway, I think that focusing on fiat-smartcoins is the way to go, at least first. We need more liquidity and tighter peg for them if we want that average people start using them. BTC isn't so high priority for me because it's mostly for traders.

108
Technical Support / Re: How much witnesses earn?
« on: March 06, 2016, 10:53:13 am »
Currently the Committee has set the Blockchain parameter for 1.5BTS  to be paid to the witness producing a block. Therefore, with 3 second block interval, the maximum hourly payment from the Reserve Pool to the Active Witnesses is 1800BTS. The amount a given witness will receive during that hour considers the total witnesses and successful block production.

Yeah, thanks, this is something how I remembered it works. The text at Cryptofresh was just a little bit misleading.

Let's make a calculation to see if I've understood everything right...

There is currently 23 witnesses, so pay per hour for one witness is 1800/23=78.26 BTS
Per day: 1800/23*24=1878.26 BTS
Per month: 1800/23*24*30=56347.82 BTS
With current price ($0.004335) that makes about 245 USD per month.

109
Technical Support / How much witnesses earn?
« on: March 06, 2016, 09:47:34 am »
How much witnesses get paid?

Cryptofresh says: "Witness budget: 1,800 BTS per hour". Does that mean 1800 BTS per hour is divided for all witnesses, so that more we have witnesses, less is the salary of one witness?

I need to know this so that I can tell what people can expect to earn if they become witnesses.

110
1) USD/BTS + CNY/BTS = USD/CNY
2) USD/BTS + EUR/BTS = USD/EUR
3) BTC/USD + BTS/USD = BTC/USD
4) BTC/CNY + BTS/CNY = BTC/CNY

the first 2 or the last 2?
if we use USD/BTS for USD/CNY as the first case and for BTC/USD as the third case, wouldn't we be messing things up?
We should decide what Synthetic order books to create/combined order books
I think it's best if we first know what Combined Order Books we need the most, and from there build the Synthetic Order Books as seen on the picture
So I would guess the last two markets (BTC/USD and BTC/CNY) make more sense for the general trading population, meaning we should get BTC/USD + BTS/USD and join them creating a Synthetic Order Book (BTC/USD) which we would then merge with the Direct Order Book BTC/USD and do the same for CNY

+

Bitcoin Side Chain

=

Combo Break!

I'd go for the first two. If we are going to make a Bitcoin sidechain, that will lead to diminishing demand for bitBTC so it doesn't make much sense to invest on that. And on the other hand, fiat-pegged currencies on the blockchain are one of our biggest strengths and they should be supported always when possible.

111
General Discussion / Re: Marketing plan for Bitshares 2.1
« on: March 06, 2016, 07:22:24 am »
IMOH(!) ... CNX is only a software provider for BitShares and nothing more. They probably won't and shouldn't be able to *just* decide on bumping the version number.
As they are merely the technological providers for BitShares, the marketing side of things has to be done by other parties (and it should be as we all know how well
marketing went with CNX/I3).

How come we have a decentralized network, decentralized community, decentralized exchange but not decentralized marketing yet?!?

Maybe I should have been more clear on this...

I don't mean that I want Cryptonomex to get fully involved with marketing. But they are a key player so any marketing effort will require some cooperation with them. They are producing the stealth feature so they know when it's going to be ready. And probably also they will know when free transactions feature is ready?

If we are going to do any kind of marketing campaign, we need to know the deadlines. There will be hardfork and marketers have to know when it's going to happen so that they can make plans and be ready to execute them at the right time.

This has been big failure point for Bitshares in the past. New features and updates are just rolled out without any effort to market them for outsiders. We can't just assume that if feature is completed, users and developers will just somehow magically find it and start using it.

Changing the version number would be really big help for the campaign, but not necessary. But we need to know if it's going to be changed or not! Bytemaster made already a positive comment on this, but didn't say anything final.

Decentralized marketing isn't something that happens automatically. There still needs to be real effort by real people to make it happen. This needs cooperation. What I'm trying to do here is get things started, let the marketing campaign emerge.

Imagine that we are a normal tech company. Engineers are making new products every now and then, but they don't tell marketing department anything about them or when they will be ready. That would suck for a traditional company, and it sucks for us too.

112
General Discussion / Re: Sidechain bitAssets
« on: March 06, 2016, 05:49:27 am »
This thread is to discuss the possibility of derivative assets such as USD, CNY and GOLD backed by Real BTC, ETH, DOGE, LTC, etc. in a way that is completely decentralized.

How would we go about this?

This has never been done before, as far as I know. It could end up bringing more awareness to our amazing innovation - bitAssets - that IMO has received far too little attention to date.

Are there any other benefits besides awareness? I think that BTS is best asset to back smartcoins. If sidechain-BTC is used, there is no additional benefit, but there is always some risk from reliability of sidechain implementation. BTS doesn't have that kind of risk.

113
Random Discussion / Re: Monero
« on: March 05, 2016, 05:46:00 pm »
Isnt monero just another alt coin?

But seriously now:

Completely new code base from Bitcoin.  Not a copy coin like LTC, Doge, etc.

Devs have added over 275000 lines of code from the original codebase Monero was forked from.  Active, large dev team, 100% community funded.

https://getmonero.org/2016/02/10/monero-missive-2015-year-in-review.html

Based on cryptonote.  Completely different algorithm from bitcoin, so it serves as a good alternative in case of a catastrophic failure in bitcoin.  Well tested cryptography with lots of academic research, cryptonote has been around for a couple decades now.   

But it's still proof-of-work, which will make it centralized and waste huge amounts of energy if it will some day get any meaningful traction.

114
General Discussion / Re: Zerocash
« on: March 05, 2016, 05:35:03 pm »
I opened a discussion on their forum but it didn't recieve any comments: https://forum.z.cash/t/why-a-bitcoin-clone-and-not-a-dac/340

115
General Discussion / Re: Local Money System
« on: March 05, 2016, 05:09:02 pm »
Seems like User Issued Assets could be very useful for him: https://bitshares.org/technology/user-issued-assets/

Yes , but it seems that all those I contacted dont want features of a typical money, in fact they are not interested in money at all. Most of them interested in some sort of credit system where users are credited and debited with assets such as units of time . With UIAs you can either have it or not, you cant be minus.

Good point, didn't think of that.

So there is a need for new feature for asset: it's value should be able to go negative. Or maybe a new asset type? This shouldn't be too difficult to implement?

Question then is, who will pay for it? Probably those users should fund it who will need it. If these local money people have software developers in their group, maybe they can implement it themselves and Bitshares needs only to accept it into the blockchain. This would be the easiest way. They will get to use a great blockchain and don't need to build their own. They can focus on user experience and UI and leave the rest of the stuff for Bitshares.

116
General Discussion / Re: So we finally turned the page on fees
« on: March 05, 2016, 04:48:14 pm »
We now need a consistent campaign that drives it home to current and past users for the next month or two if you want to see any serious results out of it.

I'm afraid that this is again a missed opportunity for marketing efforts. Marketing plans should have been ready to be executed when the changes took effect.

117
General Discussion / Re: Marketing plan for Bitshares 2.1
« on: March 05, 2016, 04:27:24 pm »
So what's the timeline here? When the stealth and free transactions features are ready? If I understood right, Bytemaster said in the latest hangout that they might be in a same hardfork quite soon.

If we want to use this possibility for focused marketing effort, we need to know only two things:

1) Is the version number going to change to 2.1?
2) When the hardfork is going to happen?

If we know these as soon as possible, anyone can make marketing plans either together or individually. We don't need to agree on a certain message, but we all need to make the effort at the same time to get the full benefit.

@bytemaster, @Stan would be nice to hear a comment from Cryptonomex on this topic.

118
If you show our GUI to anyone and ask them what it is. They will reply 'That looks like an exchange" because the core product of bitshares right now is an exchange.

That's because current wallet includes everything that Bitshares can do. But it doesn't mean that it will stay that way, it's likely that there will be different wallet for different use cases. We should be focusing on the message what Bitshares is meant to be in the future, not what it looks like now.

Anyone whos into bitcoin knows what the word decentralised implies.

No, they really don't know. There are lots of people who are talking about decentralization without thinking what it really means and what are good (and bad) ways to implement it. I'd really like Bitshares to be exception, we should have clear explanations on intellectual level and not only talk decentralization because everybody else does it.

Our other features are only special when you add "on a decentralised exchange"

Anyone can issue their own assets  on a decentralised exchange
You can  make stealth transactions on a decentralised exchange
You have fiat pegged smartcoins     on a decetralised exchange
Prediction markets the live                on a decentralised exchange

But what if you are not a trader? For a trader this tells that there are lots of stuff to be traded. But if you are an average person, this might scare you away because you are not interested in trading all these assets.

Bitshares needs to attract 2 types of people. Investors and Users

Investors
We need to attract people who like me saw BTS as a good investment. Not day traders trying to make a quick buck.
We need them to increase the price of BTS market cap which benefits all aspects of the bitshares system.

Users
These are people who want to use the exchange but not necessarily buy BTS. This will grow our network effect and therefore our marketcap.
I would say there are 2 types of users.
Asset creators like Maker or BANX. (the most important)
And normal traders looking to trade.

How would you do the marketing for these types? What is the value proposition? If you want investors, what kind of reasons would you give to them to make them interested in investing? If you want users, how you would get them to use Bitshares? Especially traders.

Reason why I'm asking these questions is that I don't feel very confident to market Bitshares to traders. They seem to be very difficult market segment.

119
What I've seen, it's quite hard to get people really excited of decentralized exchange. Exchange part is interesting mostly for cryptotraders, which is quite small group. Even smaller subgroup are the people who really want decentralized exchange. Most traders seem to be rather happy with centralized exchanges and are not ready to change just because there is decentralized alternative.

To get people excited is really important, because we need more fresh blood to do marketing efforts. As we have seen, Bitshares doesn't market itself automatically – we need actual individuals to do that. When there is no direct financial incentive, there needs to be ideological or some other type of incentive. There is probably very few people who oppose the idea of decentralized exchange on ideological level, but on the other hand, there seems to be very few people who support it strongly in ideological level and are ready to use their time and resources to market it.

Also it's not necessarily very clear to everybody what decentralized exchange actually means. "It's not decentralized if it is centralized on only one blockchain" would be one counter-argument. This is why I'd like to hear from all of you who have been wanting to focus on decentralized exchange, how exactly do you define it?

Decentralized exchange is definitely one marketing point of view, but I don't think it should be the most important. Yesterday the Bitshares.org mainpage was changed to "BitShares - Your share in the Decentralized Exchange" which is better than it was earlier, but still is not very optimized message for most of the people who could become users and investors of Bitshares.

@JonnyBitcoin I'd like to hear especially your comments.

120
General Discussion / Re: What Happened At The Satoshi Roundtable
« on: March 05, 2016, 09:38:25 am »
These are good times to emphasize that Bitshares has already solved the two biggest problems of Bitcoin. We can scale upwards without any problems for a long time, and we have the most advanced governance model that will guarantee that also all other problems can be solved effectively.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 32