961
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 02, 2015, 01:05:53 pm »TITAN is a disadvantage for bitshares. The bitshares network even do not support a blockchain explore.
Not sure if trolling.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Not sure if trolling.
962
Random Discussion / Re: Accessing forum over TOR increasingly harder
« on: April 01, 2015, 07:53:29 pm »
Is it a server/vps?
If so, I assume you are referring to an eventual 'no tor' policy on their end.
IME, this only applies to exit relays, rarely to non-exit relays, and definitely not to hidden services.
If so, I assume you are referring to an eventual 'no tor' policy on their end.
IME, this only applies to exit relays, rarely to non-exit relays, and definitely not to hidden services.
963
Technical Support / Re: To all newbies: What brought you here?
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:10:22 pm »
lol Tuck, that's pretty epic:)
965
General Discussion / Re: Don't Rush to Register Your Identity
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:06:52 pm »
966
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 05:59:27 pm »
Alright. Glad I asked! 
So, by the same token, paying for a new (titan) account FROM a TITAN account should not have privacy implications?
Even if the account reg will show up on the block right next to the 0.5 BTS fee, it will not be possible to tie that address, if the sending (paying for reg) account is TITAN. Correct?
So, by the same token, paying for a new (titan) account FROM a TITAN account should not have privacy implications?
Even if the account reg will show up on the block right next to the 0.5 BTS fee, it will not be possible to tie that address, if the sending (paying for reg) account is TITAN. Correct?
967
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 05:27:48 pm »
One angle I forgot to cover, how about NonTitanA to TitanA ? In this case it cannot be known except for the parties involved that the destination was TitanA ---- correct?
968
Technical Support / Re: Multiple wallets supported?
« on: April 01, 2015, 04:43:53 pm »
Besides moving the wallet directory (mv default default.orig && mv new_wallet default) so that the client picks the new wallet up by default, does anyone have any other suggestions?
Doing it like this is a) impractical and b) might mess up some configuration file, resulting in having to sync the whole blockchain (I have wallet backups so data loss is not my concern here)
Doing it like this is a) impractical and b) might mess up some configuration file, resulting in having to sync the whole blockchain (I have wallet backups so data loss is not my concern here)
969
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 03:15:03 pm »
That's what I thought, just wanted to make sure.
I wonder if most present users realize we are broadcasting all of our (bitshares ecosystem) financial life for the whole of the internet to see, for eternity
Speaking for myself, I was pretty convinced all accounts would be TITAN-enabled by default
Eh well, I'll take your instructions into consideration and begin planning around that.. would be sweet if the checkbox idea materializes as well, definitely.
As usual, thank you, your assistance's really appreciated
I wonder if most present users realize we are broadcasting all of our (bitshares ecosystem) financial life for the whole of the internet to see, for eternity
Speaking for myself, I was pretty convinced all accounts would be TITAN-enabled by default
Eh well, I'll take your instructions into consideration and begin planning around that.. would be sweet if the checkbox idea materializes as well, definitely.
As usual, thank you, your assistance's really appreciated
970
Technical Support / Re: Multiple wallets supported?
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:46:08 pm »
Clearly it's not through 'Import wallet'.. I tried to run BitShares with -h, --help, both ignored.
Is it possible to point BitShares to a certain wallet on startup? Since doing it after startup does not appear to be possible (do correct me if this is wrong)
Is it possible to point BitShares to a certain wallet on startup? Since doing it after startup does not appear to be possible (do correct me if this is wrong)
971
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:43:17 pm »
And -- if indeed it is the faucet, how about adding a simple checkbox, perhaps defaulting to yes, for accounts reg'd through it?good idea
https://github.com/BitShares/web_services/issues/24
972
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:41:59 pm »Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Almost .. It's actually *registering* as public account.
Good point. The account is created locally, but registered by the faucet.
Quote from: xeroc ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Jup .. that link can be made as you need to pay for it. BUT, you can also let
someone else pay the registration fee and register your account as titan
account. Also, you just need to move your funds from your account back to you
own account .. maybe in smaller junks .. and the from the blockchain, noone will
be able to tell if its still in your control or not.
Also, you don't necessarily need to 'register'.. you can use address as in
bitcoin too. This will be made easier in the next release.
So in order for your account to not be linked to any of your other funds due to
registration, you could do the following:
1) create a wallet / account (not registered)
2) get some funds from somewhere
3) create a new local account that you want to register
4) send 0.5 BTS from your funds to the new account
5) register your new account using the funds in the new account
you may even have some more intermediate steps to 'unlink' the source of your
funds.
Makes sense.. one more question, if non-titan A sends funds to non-titan B, can anyone automatically know this by observing the blockchain?
EDIT: to be more precise, can anyone know that NonTitanA is sending to NonTitanB (knowing that the transaction occured is possible by anyone, of course, but can anyone know the account names from blockchain observation?)
973
General Discussion / Re: The move of sovereign Nations to Crypto has begun
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:37:12 pm »
Remember which date is today ! 
974
Random Discussion / Re: Accessing forum over TOR increasingly harder
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:35:45 pm »
I run hundreds of servers/vms for dozens of clients, I'd say I have an idea 
Grossly overstated.. YMMV
Grossly overstated.. YMMV
975
Technical Support / Re: Incorrect TITAN instructions in wiki
« on: April 01, 2015, 02:34:06 pm »
And -- if indeed it is the faucet, how about adding a simple checkbox, perhaps defaulting to yes, for accounts reg'd through it?
