It probably isn't Bm decision. He is probably under nda


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see a lot of unfounded speculation.   Bytemaster never gave up on privacy he just didn't have a solution until block stream  published it on the same day 2.0 was announced.    It didn't take Bm long to recognize the value and integrate support. 

With the latest work of arghad on porting ct to JavaScript I bet gui integration takes higher priority. 

Bm is not a gui developer but has grown the gui team for 2.0 to a total of 5 or 6.   Even Nathan is doing gui work.  That leaves only 4 people doing backend work.   

Back seat managers think they can get more out of cass svk chronos and valentine James and  others don't know what they are talking about.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think it is safe to say the fee should never be more than 10% of the value transferred, but must be at least a min amount and at most a max amount. 

$10 for max fee.  $0.01 for min fee and 0.5% otherwise.

That would make it $0.50 to transfer $100. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Using a sharding approach bts could also increase its tps linearly with the number of shards.   

Our pre-optimized code can process 180,000 on average hardware.   Upgrade the cpu and add a few optimizations and I bet bts hits 500000 tps without all of the down sides of sharding. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"
No, this is long term Ethereum research and development Skunk Works kind of stuff. Highest txps we've reached on the current implementation is 40.
The work the researchers are doing now is for future iterations of Ethereum in 1/2 years or so.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Current yield on bitusd is preventing the market from settling as no one wants to sell their bitusd


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think watching price moves is a indicator of a missed news item.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk