They are still leading.  We see them working and proposing ideas every day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Look it is very clear the devs are working to make bitshares better and giving bitshares everything.   It is also equally clear that the devs stake in bts is shrinking or non existent because they have to sell to pay the bills.    Where do you think they are getting the money to pay devs enough to live on?

So it seems really clear to me.  Bitshares needs to give the devs more stake or we will always doubt. 

Think about it,  if they held 80% of bts would we ever doubt their loyalty.   They now control less than ever and people expect them to sell off what they have left while working below market.   At this trajectory devs will have no stake in months.   

Deep down those afraid about dev loyalty need to back the devs and start a campaign for more delegates.  It is those of us that demand devs work for peanuts and remain loyal that are the most greedy and selfish of all.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's what they say they are planning.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Privacy means more personal responsibility for tracking keys and larger wallets.   Seems like a reasonable trade off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Confidential addresses couldn't vote because no one knows the balance. 

Light wallets need out of band notification.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If IDs cannot be trusted then the whole protocol breaks down. 

Users should share the ID as the primary identifier.  The name is a check. 

In some sense names are less necessary and should not be used on their own. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk