61
General Discussion / Re: Committee Proposal: Urgent call for help by the Chinese Community
« on: November 28, 2015, 05:04:54 pm »
Privatize the smart coin. Tanswire can have complete control of all Params
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
General Discussion / Re: Why we need the "request settlement" feature? please stop robbing the shorter!
« on: November 27, 2015, 02:16:07 pm »
These are all tunable parameters and don't require a hard fork. Any one can create a bitasset with the exact Params they think will magically solve all problems. Hint: everything is a trade off
63
General Discussion / Re: Discussing the problems with bitUSD (smart coins)
« on: November 26, 2015, 07:13:49 pm »
The point was to create a currency, not a trading instrument. The currency use case requires fungible long positions.
64
General Discussion / Re: poll for changing call_order_update fee from 40 BTS to 5BTS
« on: November 26, 2015, 03:24:02 pm »
This fee can be lower it isn't our core business. I say lower to 1 BTS
65
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Graphene-ui 2.0.151125 released
« on: November 26, 2015, 03:19:41 pm »
Great work!
66
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: November 22, 2015, 10:34:10 pm »
JavaScript console.
67
General Discussion / Re: NuShares price discussion
« on: November 22, 2015, 10:33:23 pm »
Buy backs are irresponsible for young businesses.
68
General Discussion / Re: Welcome back to $50MM Market Cap
« on: November 21, 2015, 02:35:25 pm »
We do! Anyone can put money into a vesting balance
69
General Discussion / Re: First Organized Mutually Agreed Proposal
« on: November 19, 2015, 03:52:13 am »
Regardless the proposed fees I'm glad to see the process working
70
General Discussion / Re: [Ann] Electrons.io Open Beta Testing [Ann]
« on: November 14, 2015, 02:42:38 pm »
You should get this integrated with the wallet by submitting a pull request
71
General Discussion / Re: Reasons for Lowering Fees
« on: November 14, 2015, 02:34:12 pm »Trying to break into a business field where the established competition already has razor thin margins is almost a guaranteed failure. We need to focus on staying profitable and exploiting our niche market of decentralized trading.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
What is the value of a decentralized exchange that no centralized exchange can replicate? Sell that value. If the value is non existent then the whole thing is pointless. If it is there then people will pay.
73
Technical Support / Re: Result of transfer api - Whats the transaction id?
« on: November 08, 2015, 04:35:18 pm »
Use the new transfer2 api
74
General Discussion / Re: Help keep transfer fees to save the referral system and help Bitshares grow!
« on: November 08, 2015, 04:30:34 pm »
The plan is to change it so that trading fees go to referrer. Currently the order create and cancel fees go to referrer
75
General Discussion / Re: Help keep transfer fees to save the referral system and help Bitshares grow!
« on: November 08, 2015, 01:26:56 pm »
Everyone claiming Bm didn't communicate is full of it. He clearly stated that order matching fees were reserved for asset issuers to incentivize them. Bts has a 0% trading fee and it has been that way in every test net. Just because you didn't know doesn't mean it was not communicated many times in many ways.
