Nice! Last node release was when we updated to 2.0, right?

Here is the correct answer if you believe in math:

All of them

Never put all your eggs into 1 basket is more than just an ancient parable, but a math equation based on the probablity of every one of your eggs getting simultaneously (in this lifetime) stolen.

Are you implying splitting up funds into different wallets, secured in different ways?

It seems to me that, mathematically speaking, if the probabilities of funds getting stolen of the different methods is not equal, then, compared to just using the most optimal method for all, you are actually increasing the chance of some of your funds being stolen. I guess the problem is that we don't necessarily know what the probabilities of theft are for each method.

Something else to consider with brain keys- you basically always have your funds "on you", which means they can be revoked from you via violent force (i.e. torture). Therefore you not only have to keep the brain key secret, you also have to keep secret that you have a brain key at all. Maybe have two brain keys so you can give one away as a decoy.

Another thing- you should know what is the decryption method needed to obtain your private key. 20 years from now, software and wallets can change, and wallet generation methods may change as well. If you know though, that you just need to take the SHA256 of your 16-phrase mnemonic (for example), then as long as you have access to a computer you can obtain your private key.

They're probably running their own node. I wouldn't be surprised if they ran into memory issues, as currently the needed memory scales up linearly with the total number of blocks. You currently need over 12GB of RAM. There's an issue about it here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/192

Do you have a good reason for wanting to move from the desktop wallet to the web-based wallet?

Hey,

Can you add support for the RUBLE Smartcoin please?

Thanks

Edit: My favourite market pairs keep getting erased

What do you mean? You just change the URL directly to access them

I think the solution here is obvious... Time to remove Chris from the equation and redistribute a new blockpay token without Chris.  Ken can do this by creating a new token... Whatever value blockpay had has been destroyed by Chris for what seems no good reason.

I would trust ken, the man who I bought the OPENPOS token from and has shown me real results, over some scammer kid who's Daddy is a lawyer

Are you suggesting to screw over all BLOCKPAY holders? Or are you talking about some kind of sharedrop minus Chris? If that's the case, watch Chris' account for any movement... Can anyone else smell the karmic irony?

ok, good to know. I doubt the chain has any witnesses, so I'm just going to wait.