Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kokojie

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20
16
General Discussion / Is there any downside to rewarding the voters?
« on: April 05, 2015, 04:21:36 pm »
In vast majority of PoS coin, when you stake your coin, you get something back, it might be tiny like 1% annually. But in Bitshares, when you stake(vote) for 101 delegates, there's no reward associated with it. So a lot of people might not bother to vote, especially those who are new to the community and don't know most of the delegates, they don't have any incentive to spend time to research delegates and vote.

So is there any downside to giving a financial reward for voters? Similar to the interest on BitUSD.

For example, for every 30 days you have voted, you get 0.0001 BTS per delegate per BTS you voted?, so for a person with 1M BTS voted 101 delegates, he would be rewarded 101 BTS every 30 days

17
DevShares / Re: DevShares 0.9.0 Feedback
« on: April 02, 2015, 03:19:21 am »
Try https://github.com/BitShares/DevShares/blob/master/BUILD_UBUNTU.md

That's weird, I followed the steps in your link, and it worked. Was there something wrong in my old steps?

18
DevShares / Re: DevShares 0.9.0 Feedback
« on: April 01, 2015, 11:54:28 pm »
I could not compile on ubuntu 14.14, I was doing the regular:
git clone https://github.com/BitShares/devshares/ dvs_0.9.0
cd dvs_0.9.0
git checkout dvs/0.9.0
git submodule init
git submodule update
cmake .
make

Got the following errors:

-- Found OpenSSL: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.a;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a (found version "1.0.1f")
** for a debug build: cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug ..
CMake Error at libraries/fc/CMakeLists.txt:193 (add_subdirectory):
  The source directory

    /home/user/dvs_0.9.0/libraries/fc/vendor/websocketpp

  does not contain a CMakeLists.txt file.


-- Finished fc module configuration...
-- Using  as BerkeleyDB root
-- Looking for: db_cxx-6.0
-- debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdb_cxx.sooptimized/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdb_cxx.so
-- Found BerkeleyDB: /usr/include
-- Enabling Bitcoin Core Wallet Imports
-- Could NOT find Curses (missing:  CURSES_LIBRARY CURSES_INCLUDE_PATH)
-- Found Readline: /usr/include
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/user/dvs_0.9.0/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
user@ubuntu:~/dvs_0.9.0$ sudo make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.


19
I want to remember ALL delegates to publish pricefeeds.

In the last days the delegates on the 5 main bitAssets are down do 64/101

- i still think any delegate should publish pricefeeds, especially ALL core devs. Why are some core devs not publishing? In the past TOAST and others stated they want to code something on their own. I am fine with that, but not in 1 year! All of you had enough time, and it looks to me you have no time to do it, so just use an already existing feedscript.

maybe this is also a good time to discuss the feed idea at all. Do we really need them or can we come up with a better solution?

I think it's because there was recently a big increase in 100% delegates, but some of them have little experience of actually running delegates, and are not publishing feeds. While they gained position, a few 3% technical delegates were pushed out of 101 position, and they were publishing feeds. This is why the total number of feeds went down.

I feel it's time to revisit the "delegate rotation" idea. (which is basically we'll have a number of delegate positions, let's say 10, that are randomly rotated. All standby delegates, that are running up to date delegate versions, publishing feeds, have a chance to be rotated into these active delegate positions for some time say 30 days, then it rotates again). This also gives standby delegates a chance to produce blocks and "prove" they are reliable delegates. So we can have a large army of standby delegates ready to be voted in, and strengthen the network.

20
General Discussion / Re: there is no apple version of V0.8.1
« on: March 27, 2015, 04:33:34 pm »
0.8.1 is delegate only I believe

21
General Discussion / Re: BTS 0.8.1 is forking
« on: March 26, 2015, 02:07:06 pm »
how do I know if I'm on the wrong chain?

22
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.8.0 Feedback
« on: March 24, 2015, 03:17:35 am »
One of the things I like about the latest upgrades, is there's no need to re-index the entire blockchain anymore. Is this a new feature?

23
DevShares / Re: DevShares 0.6.3 Feedback
« on: March 20, 2015, 04:37:36 pm »
For some reason my 0.6.3 DVS windows gui client can not be unlocked, I'm sure the password is correct, but when I click on unlock, nothing happens, no error or anything. I tried deleting my "chain" folder re-download blockchain, and it didn't help. I'm running it on windows 7 64bit with 4GB ram. Also this only happened since yesterday, but I've had this client for several weeks, and it was working previously, I didn't change anything with the client, but I did have a unscheduled sudden reboot just before yesterday.
Have you tried unlocking using the CLI version?

It's possible to run CLI on windows?

24
General Discussion / BTER certificate problem?
« on: March 19, 2015, 10:24:10 pm »
When I'm visiting bter, I get this message with firefox:
Quote
bter.com uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate expired on 3/19/2015 3:55 PM.

The current time is 3/19/2015 6:22 PM. (Error code: sec_error_expired_certificate)

25
DevShares / Re: DevShares 0.6.3 Feedback
« on: March 19, 2015, 10:15:07 pm »
For some reason my 0.6.3 DVS windows gui client can not be unlocked, I'm sure the password is correct, but when I click on unlock, nothing happens, no error or anything. I tried deleting my "chain" folder re-download blockchain, and it didn't help. I'm running it on windows 7 64bit with 4GB ram. Also this only happened since yesterday, but I've had this client for several weeks, and it was working previously, I didn't change anything with the client, but I did have a unscheduled sudden reboot just before yesterday.

26
in what way does Bitshares prevent this from happening?

27
Should just have someone auto upload a "latest" version and host it somewhere, so all websites can point to that, something like:

http://bitshares.org/binaries/BitShares-latest.exe
http://bitshares.org/binaries/BitShares-latest.dmg

So you don't have to update the website each time, just upload the newest version and rename them to "latest"

Also point them to the github release page, to see details.

28
General Discussion / Re: [Rough Idea] Introduce 5% delegate rotation
« on: March 18, 2015, 07:27:54 pm »
I agree, there has to be some incentive for people to run standby delegates. It's difficult to keep updating/monitoring your delegate server, while have no chance being voted, receive 0 pay and forever be standby.

Also I agree there needs to be some criteria to be considered, the standby delegate must have:
* latest client version (most important, since this proves they are active)
* publishing feeds

and we can reserve some spots in the 101 delegates, just for randomly having stand by delegates start producing blocks. (or maybe keep the current 101 delegate limit, but add 10 more random spots, something like 101+10).

29
没明白怎么用图形界面在内盘找到CNFUND:BitCNY这个交易pair?

就在客户端交易所菜单,右边市场列表的最上面有一个输入框,里面输入CNFUND:BitCNY就可以找到了

谢谢,那请问你是怎么发放利息的呢?

30
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Please vote for "kokojie". 3% pay
« on: March 18, 2015, 03:46:47 pm »
Please more votes for my delegate. I'm at position 101 in active delegates, sooooo close to falling off. I have produced over 16k blocks, always update to date with client versions, publishes all price feeds. Please help me stay in the active delegate group. Thanks!!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20