I have the following error message:

"We're sorry, but something went wrong"

If you created the bitshares address that you are searching for before Nov 2015, then they are BTS 1.0 shares.

These are redeemable 1:1 for BTS 2.0 bts.
But you have to import them.

This thread may help https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24032.0.html

@rnglab thanks for your input, your idea is suggestive, we need to think more and do more.

now I just share one news: last week I met the people of WanCloud under WanXiang Blockchain, They told me that they are interested in Bitshares and hope to join the Bitshares community as an institution, they will provide witness and API server service, and hope to work with Bitshaers in other areas.

Source: http://www.econotimes.com/Wanxiang-Group-launches-new-blockchain-product-WanCloud-703699

“WanCloud is not just a technical platform; it’s an open innovation platform,” Haifeng Xi, CTO of WanCloud, told Bitcoin Magazine. “WanCloud is essentially a bridge between [the] global blockchain development community and China. We aim to connect the world to the Chinese developer community, Chinese startups and traditional Chinese businesses.”

WanCloud offers an ecosystem for open-source blockchain protocols to be localized and made easily accessible to the Chinese development community. The initial blockchain protocols include developers and consultants BlockApps, Factom and Stellar.

“This partnership is important for Factom China because it will make it easier for our product to reach and serve the needs of the end users in China. WanCloud is really adding value, helping us localize the platform for enterprise users and the large community of developers in China,” Zeen Zhang, CEO of Factom China, said.

www.cryptofresh.com

?

What's so good about NEM?

2 Months ago, 19th March 2017, NEM's market cap was $150,000,000. (An all time high at the time).

Today, NEM's market cap is $2,300,000,000.

Growth of 14x in 2 months?

Was there some particular news or something?
I've done a little reading on it and it doesn't seem "all that"

Quote from: btswildpig on May 19, 2017, 05:43:36 am

Do u think implementing Dogecoin on BTS as an asset will ever compete with Dogecoin?

Try it .
Make a Dogecoin in BTS and send it around . If the DogecoinAsset somehow managed to beat Dogecoin's market cap, then u can start considering the so-called migration of BTS to EOS.

Don't forget the bloody lesson learned from the threat "Vote will kill u all if u don't merge".

You miss the option of "take all the good stuff from EOS and upgrade the BitShares architecture" ..

I would like this approach

But, if this could be done. Then that would imply that Dan didn't want to just lobby BTS 2 shareholders to implement his new changes, and decided to build a whole new system just because

Surely there is a reason it was rebuilt from scratch.
Obviously the bits that can be "borrowed" from EOS and implemented to BTS 2 should be, but will they really be 'the best bits'?

Do u think implementing Dogecoin on BTS as an asset will ever compete with Dogecoin?

Try it .
Make a Dogecoin in BTS and send it around . If the DogecoinAsset somehow managed to beat Dogecoin's market cap, then u can start considering the so-called migration of BTS to EOS.

Don't forget the bloody lesson learned from the threat "Vote will kill u all if u don't merge".

point taken.
Dogecoin is backed by it's community.
The BitShares community needs to back BTS 2

BTS 2.0 may well fair just fine, carrying on as if EOS doesn't exist

 

I also care about providing liquidity between bitusd, bitcny, biteur and bitsilver and bitgold not only pairs between bts: bitsilver and bitgold because bts is volatile and sometimes the transition from bitfiat to bts to bitmetals can be proved profitable but other times not..so someone who uses the DEX to save do not want to go through this volatility..

What can we do to provide bitfiat:bitmetals liquidity? Do we need to change some parameters?

So you want traders to be able to borrow bitGold from the market, and use bitUSD as collateral (a CfD, contract for difference)
In this way bitGold trades against bitUSD.

If bitUSD can be used as collateral in such a CfD, then the bitUSD itself must be collateralized with bts. BTS must be the collateral-of-last-resort(?)

So trader A thinks that the price of gold in dollars is going to go down. He wants to take a leveraged bet that he is right. He wants to be short gold and long USD.
So in order to borrow 1oz of gold (~$1200), he needs 110% collateral of $1200, which = $1320bitUSD to collateralise this trade.
Let's assume trader A is the first to use BitShares so he cannot find a trade partner to buy bitUSD from.
So he must short it into existence himself.

Trader A borrows bitUSD from the blockchain using bts as collateral, in the usual way.
Trader A needs to borrow $1320bitUSD.
He needs to collateralise this loan with 175% bts.
So trader A needs $2,310 worth of bts so create this bitUSD.

At this stage, trader A owes debts of $2,310 bts, and long $1320bitUSD

Trader A then uses his $1,320bitUSD as collateral to create 1oz of bitGOLD.

At this stage, trader A is now long 1oz Gold ($1200), and in debt bts (collateral worth $2,310, or around 44,000bts today.)

Trader A then sells his created bitGold to the market, (because he thinks gold will do down in price). He trades with Trader B, and Trader A receives $1200bitUSD.

Trader A is now long $1200bitUSD, and has debts of $2,310 worth of bts to the blockchain.
Trader A doesn't care about the price of bts.
What can he do?

=============

So in order to meet the demand for a bitGOLD:bitUSD trading pair, short traders will need to be laying out 192.5% collateral in bts.
But people who want so trade bitGold:bitUSD, don't care about hte price of bts.
How can this trading pair function without involving price exposure to bts?

This isn't such a problem if one day bts is so liquid and stable that there is only negligible volatility.
But it's a LONG LONG way off that.
So can this bitGold:bitUSD pair exist without bts?

If this can be done.... then what is the point of bts in the first place...