Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - topcandle

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
226
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 21, 2015, 04:42:42 pm »


After thinking about it I have personally moved those BTS away from Polo and bought some cheap Brownies...


[/quote]

EZACTLY MY POINT!  Brownies are cheap and are cheapening the value of Bitshares.   Your selling BTS for Brownies meaning that BTS is losing its value because of the Brownies. 

227
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 21, 2015, 03:36:29 pm »
Why can't ethereum handle bitshares right now?  What are the technical challenges?

228
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 21, 2015, 03:04:59 pm »
The price is dropping because of the sharedrop for Brownie Points.  Its as if your saying, we think 20% of the value of this DAC belongs to my funny money.  So as a result, Bitshares is dropping downwards to met the value of Brownie Points. 

229
General Discussion / Re: Test GUI for Normal Users!
« on: August 21, 2015, 02:26:10 pm »
ITS FIXED NOW!

230
General Discussion / Re: thanks to coinbase
« on: August 21, 2015, 01:47:26 pm »
So your saying we'll use Coinbase funnels to get into Bitshares?  And get free mulah?!

231
General Discussion / Re: Test GUI for Normal Users!
« on: August 21, 2015, 12:23:17 am »
The testnet is forking that's why. 

As Ronald Reagon once said. 

Mr. Bytemaster tear down this op wall!

232
Definitely

Is this part of your master plan for Bitshares?

This is one of many :)

233
Meta / Re: You guys are being censored here
« on: August 19, 2015, 06:39:56 pm »
+5

234
General Discussion / Re: We are vulnerable in decision making
« on: August 19, 2015, 02:19:45 pm »
One of the things we have worked hard to accomplish is elimination of any central points of coercion.  This has some of the disadvantages indicated by the OP, but it may be a cost worth paying.

Instead, we have evolved a system where devs can be hired independently, while on the marketing side, we have left the referral incentives in place to attract independent marketing initiatives that to a large extent don't need to be coordinated.

Let me explain.

We have a common backbone that all sorts of enterprises can build on.  In general, each can create a different marketing message to their customers, and wind up describing the benefits of a shared backbone any way they like.

The average consumer may not need to know much about the backbone, so we may not really need a unified public perspective on BitShares itself.  As long as guys like Ronny and all our other partners and independent entrepreneurs are out their explaining to the public the competitive benefits that their specific businesses are able to offer because they share a financial backbone with many other businesses, the essential marketing function of attracting, training, and servicing new users can go forward without much coordination.

The only thing they all need in common is some branding of the common backbone itself, like the "powered by BitShares" or "member of BitShares Exhange Network", since that fact is the universal common denominator that leads customers to appreciate a network effect.

But even that branding can be left to partners and entrepreneurs, each of whom can explain the benefits of the BitShares Network in terms their own customers will best understand

Our partners have huge incentives to do this custom tailored marketing and better understanding of their specific customers than any one-message-fits-all marketing could ever hope to achieve.

Hence, do we really need centralized marketing? 
Sure.  But not as much as we might first think.

Now marketing the possibilities to new partners is still a challenge, but even that can be done by a thousand uncoordinated evangelists reaching out to entrepreneurs everywhere with a custom message for each one of them.

This is all unsubstantiated talk.  Ronny and what other partners?  What businesses are building ontop of Bitshares?  certainly not identabit.  BANX might have shares ontop bitshares today, but they could certainly fork to another network like ripple.  I'm not aware of any partner that will dramatically bring demand to bitshares.  Why would anyone want to build ontop of bitshares when they have their own private blockchains?

235
Ahhh!  Bitshares is so useless in hedging out Bitcoins risk.  All coins have been hit!
Bitassets?

not when $1 = 1.06 bitUSD

it's better you loose 30% minimum holding bitcoins  or whatever...  ( because you can not withstand 6%)




This was kind of my point.  He mentioned hedging, which to me is minimizing your losses /exposure to risk.  Even if BITUSD is at 1.06, it is still a solid hedge against the drop in bts price overall.

Bitusd has such low liquidity its useless.  Hedge is only as good as the exposure your able to hedge out. 

236
Ahhh!  Bitshares is so useless in hedging out Bitcoins risk.  All coins have been hit!

237
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 17, 2015, 12:36:18 am »
Ended up selling at .0058 for a small gain.  I dont have any idea how long this bounce will last.

I thought you said the bear decline was in reversal.....?  Changing your tune now?

238
That's 250 dollars to open a prediction market.  I think there should be a even harder variable cost for spamming the net worth with uia's that gets incrementally and linearly more expensive the one more character added

239
Read the article.  It is a little bit concerning.  From one person on reddit:

[–]danielravennest 5 points 5 hours ago
This ruling raises all kinds of questions:
So if I get a certificate from Starbucks for a free coffee, it that a commodity-backed (coffee) token (the certificate)? Whether the token is paper or electronic shouldn't matter.
I'm a woodworker, and formerly owned 100 acres of timber land, and occasionally saw up logs for their lumber. Say I get some friends to help cut up the wood. It's heavy work, and people have helped me in the past. I tell them they can have some of the lumber once it dries, and use a colored coin as a token to prove ownership. Then they can trade it around to other people who would get the lumber eventually.
Lumber is definitely a commodity, and the colored coin is a token. So do I need to register as a money transmitter? What if I have a commercial sawmill, and sell my future production to lumber users using colored coins? That might be a way to finance expansion without taking a big loan.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23