Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - JonnyB

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 43
151
Lost bitassets could be taken care of with the help of demurrage.  It would decrease balances of longers and shorters by same amount with time, and lost balances would eventually go to zero.

Maybe demurrage could solve this particular problem but demurrage is a bad idea generally for a currency we want people adopt whether thats bitusd or BTS.

Collateral in lost accounts can be released by force settlement.
Collateral in lost accounts released by force settlement is still lost.

But as stated in original post, losing BTS (the collateral not collateral position) is not an issue. The same way lost bitcoin is not an issue.

152
Collateral in lost accounts can be released by force settlement.

only if they are the least collateralised positions

153
Interesting thought. Can you think of any way to provably "lose" the keys to a wallet?

Best thing I came up with was massive multisig account with loads of signatures all of which promise to destroy their accounts.

154
"Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone."   Satoshi Nakamoto

Above is one of Satoshi famous quotes about people losing bitcoin.

But bitshares is different and I think the following is true

Lost wallets that hold bitshares make everyone else's bitshares worth slightly more.
Lost wallets that have open collateral positions are probably a good thing for liquidity.
Lost wallets holding BitAssets are bad for liquidity

If there are more lost bitUSD than lost BitUSD collateral positions then it is impossible to close all the collateral positions. This could create a situation where the demand for bitUSD is higher than supply.

We need the opposite situation for liquidity. We need the supply of BitUSD to be higher than demand. (remember theres always demand below face value because of the ability to force settle for profit)

This leads me to believe we should create an account that creates a bunch of BitUSD then lose the keys on purpose. This would be akin to the base money (M1 supply) that Central banks create.

This would help solve the problem of kickstarting trust in those who would like to create BitUSD but are currently afraid due to lack of BitUSD supply near the market price.

This is complex stuff to get your head around but I've tried to write it concisely as possible.

155
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: February 24, 2017, 06:37:18 pm »
only 5 witnesses answered the call to action within 24 hours https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23826 - as a consequence I deleted my vote for all other witnesses.



hopefully the change to 3bts will bring in some fresh and motivated witnesses. I will gladly add them to my slate.

Thanks, I have added the ones I wasn't already voting for.
Do you know if my share weight is spread across all the witnesses I elect.  Or if i voted for just 1 witness would they get more?

156
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 24, 2017, 03:26:12 pm »
It you look on Telegram, Steemit, and Mumble... it's no way stagnant.

There's is a hive of activity going on, It s a shame this isn't perceivable when visiting bitshares.org

157
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: February 23, 2017, 03:25:11 pm »
I need a bot that can use Poloniex as current price source. How i can do that?

I would like that too. particularly for USDT:BTC


158
General Discussion / Re: [Evaluation] Need for a better python library?
« on: February 17, 2017, 02:03:56 am »

Worker
Given that a worker will be voted in for quite some time, I would like to propose a new model of running a worker:
  • I will create a new account, upgrade it to LTM and make it multisig with the committee account and trusted members of the comunity
  • The worker will redeem it's funds on a regular basis and buy up bitUSD from the market (only up to +5% above market)
  • If the market doesn't offer sufficient bitUSD, the worker account will borrow bitUSD at 2.5x collateral
  • For this reasons, the actual pay of the worker is 2.5x the USD value
  • The worker will only pay the agreed amount of money and only in bitUSD to me
  • Every thing that is not paid out after the end of the worker will be settled and returned to the reserve fund

you say " The worker will redeem it's funds on a regular basis and buy up bitUSD from the market "

But if you buy up lots of bitusd and put it in the chainsquad account there will be less bitusd in the marketplace.
I would prefer it if you created all the bitusd to boost the overall supply and help the liquidity issues we have.

Also if you are buying up bitusd with bts, that is the same as dumping bts which will create downward pressure on the bts price.

159
General Discussion / Re: Liquidity, Liquidity, Liquidity
« on: February 16, 2017, 07:45:25 pm »
I get some idea, I will try to make below markets:

bitUSD:BTC
bitCNY:BTC
bitUSD:USDT
bitCNY:bitUSD

if these markets become prosperous, then DEX can be a hub to link China BTC traders and the exchanges outside China, and even CNY and USD markets.

maybe bots need to run not only inside DEX, but also with exchanges like polo, bitfinex, yunbi...?

This would be wonderful!  My bots are already linked to all these outside exchanges.

Can you use your bots to essentially mirror the bids and asks from poloniex on to the dex?

160
General Discussion / Re: Liquidity, Liquidity, Liquidity
« on: February 13, 2017, 06:20:09 pm »
although the process to increase witness payment is still on going, I am considering another possibility - to pay witness in bitUSD.
frankly speaking I have considered to use bitCNY to do this, as bitCNY has better supply and market depth than bitUSD, but more bitCNY supply may lead to one result that had happened: most of the bitCNY finally acculmate in transwiser and transwiser have to force settle. so maybe bitUSD is a better choise.

suppose 0.004$ is BTS price, then block payment should be 0.012$, 345.6 USD per day.

let reserve pool borrow 62208 bitUSD - which is total witness payment for 180 days, with 0.004$ as price and 5 as collateral ratio, that need 77,760,000 BTS for collateral - seems OK.

in order to get USD for position close, every week committee will place an order to sell 604800BTS  - the total weekly witness payment with 3BTS/block, with the price calculated out from some rules: the highest BTS price in the last week or other better rules.

It would be great if witnesses and workers could be paid in BitUSD automatically by the blockchain. Unfortunately bitshares is not designed to do this and as you suggest the only way is by trusting the committee with large collateral positions.

@xeroc latest worker is similar to this proposal, lets see how that goes


I'm not sure if shareholders would be happy to trust the comittee with such large amounts.


161
General Discussion / Re: [vote] Upgrade Forum Software
« on: February 07, 2017, 11:21:22 am »
We could just upgrade our current forum software (simple machines) from  2.0.9 to 2.0.13

162
General Discussion / Re: Integrate Hardware Wallet into the Bitshares DEX??
« on: February 05, 2017, 05:54:45 am »
I think the trezor web wallet is open source now, could just add a tab to the gui that clones it.   https://github.com/trezor/webwallet-data

163
General Discussion / Liquidity, Liquidity, Liquidity
« on: February 01, 2017, 06:20:23 pm »
Bitshares is superior to other exchanges because it uses BitUSD which has no human liability and is decentralised.
But this advantage means little if our BitUSD is not available to buy in quantity near the peg.

A liquid asset is cash on hand or an asset that can be readily converted to cash. An asset that can readily be converted into cash is similar to cash itself because the asset can be sold with little impact on its value.


We need to make BitUSD a liquid asset. But how?
 
1.) Focus on BitUSD
We must concentrate trading activity on BitUSD.
There is no point trying to make all our smartcoins liquid assets at the same time as this spreads trades thinly across many markets.
The number of trade tabs on Openledgers GUI has been reduced which is great but the OBITS one still needs to be removed.


2.) Simplify borrowing of BitUSD
Make it more intuitive to borrow BitUSD by adding borrow as an action next to the BitUSD. (update: @svk  has now implemented this)


3.) BitUSD:OPEN.USDT market
The best way to show people BitUSD is worth 1 USD is to create a market where BitUSD trades against a bearer asset that is worth 1 USD.  That would be USDT (see www.tether.to)
Bearer asset = Doesn't need to be kept in a named account.
I am trying to kick start the BitUSD:OPEN.USDT market with $1000 buy and sell walls and a 6% spread. Please take advantage of them or add some orders yourself. This market pair is easy for anyone to be a market maker in because  both assets have the same face value meaning you don't have to trust bot software  because orders don't need updating

 
4.) Maker / Taker model.
This is a model that incentivises people to put up orders for other people to take.
if you take orders off the orderbook you pay more. If you make orders on the order book you pay less. (trade fees)
I personally think at this stage the maker taker model won't help much and will be a lot of effort to implement. there is lower hanging fruit to be had first.

5.)Bots
Bots are bits of software that do automated trading, most trades that happen in the world today are done by bots. These bots are configured by their human owners to do stuff like abitrage or market making. These are essential to liquidity on the dex and their importance is underestimated .
Any coder can create a bot and let others use the software.  @xeroc created a bot in python that is available here:https://github.com/xeroc/stakemachine
But if you're not a developer you can use this web based bot system created by @alt www.btsbots.com
If thats too hard for you see point number 3.) again.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23457.0.html



6.) Distribute BitUSD

Getting even small amounts of bitUSD in to users hands familiarises them with it and even if they dump it thats still adding trades to the market.
The idea of getting more bitusd out there is a good one and has been discussed many times on this forum. Who to and how is the tricky bit.

As a dividend to shareholders or Lifetime Members: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23706.msg301767.html#msg301767
To pay worker proposals and witnesses: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23028.0.html
Just create Bitusd using from the reserve pool via a worker proposal and then sell at peg: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22935.0.html

164
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: January 31, 2017, 05:21:51 am »
If someone created a BTC.UIA  with zero trade fee and zero deposit/withdraw fee
Would Openledger be able to do anything stop it trading with their UIAs

I'm pretty sure the answer is no but is there something clever that could be done with blacklisting or transfer freezing that could prevent it?

165
General Discussion / Re: [vote] Upgrade Forum Software
« on: January 31, 2017, 04:12:28 am »
bump

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 43