Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ByronP

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
No doesn't work properly and there is an issue with the 100 record limit since if you have more transactions than that you have no way of knowing unless you manually check each block which as you pointed out won't help without the id and is a huge waste of resources to do hence the need for a get/list since block type function.

17
Ohh u mean calling get block and looking to scan the operations and get ids. Haven't had to do that but for a good explorer or something it would be very useful. I get a list of ids from my history and then call get object with the txid and I get all the details.

18
U can use get_object to get a transaction by id

19
So I assume I am not missing anything, Anyone else think this needs to be added? Put your hands up guys (and gals) :-)

20
Technical Support / Re: Privacy warning
« on: October 25, 2015, 12:07:26 pm »
To answer bitmarlys question about isps seeing the url: In short yes they can.

The dns system is not encrypted so the first thing that is done when trying to establish the tcp connection to the server is to contact a dns server and ask for the information about the host you are trying to connect to. In most cases this dns server that you hit first is controlled by your isp and they can see what host you are looking for. The dns server (won't get into dns authorities as this will get really long) returns the ip address that your machine will actually connect to. So a url of say google.com/?q=dns (transport doesn't matter aka: http, https, ws, wss, ftp, tftp...) is actually 173.194.123.46/?q=dns. Essentially the name of the host in this url is google.com and it is just a friendly mask for the ip address 173.194.123.46.

You can try this yourself by opening a command prompt and typing ping google.com (or any other domain you want).

21
Curious as to the logic behind only being able to retrieve the last few transactions instead of having a function that returns all transactions after a given head height? This seems counter intuitive to me. Is there a call I am missing somewhere? It's not life or death not having it but it should be available to avoid wasting bandwidth and time looping through transactions.

Thoughts anyone?

22
fair enough i'm not arguing that (although its not a simple build on win). My disgust is with being jumped on.

23
Ya I get the link removal that's understandable however the official builds are borked. But this guy brings shame to the community with his arrogance. FYI there are several exchanges that have been having trouble and have received little if any real world help (and they know who I am since i am not new in the exchange owners circle). Which is partially because integrating into an exchange is a bit more complex than most would think.

24
Sorry for offering to help. Was not aware that this community was full of unappreciative assholes.

25
U obviously don't know who I am lol

26
For Windows users you can get a good working build from me here https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=*********************!16620&authkey=!**************8&ithint=file%2czip

If you are an Exchange and need help migrating and understanding how to use the api hit me up and I will be happy to help. It is quite a bit different than 1.0 and can take a bit to understand the new way of doing things especially ensuring transactions are legit and not reversible.

testz: Link hided for security reasons.

27
General Discussion / Re: Banx, future plans and BTS
« on: October 22, 2015, 12:26:23 pm »
Look Mark is a marketing guy and a human being so put yourself in his shoes for a minute. He is doing the best he can to please everyone but we all know that it is impossible to do. Banx is a legit company despite what anyone thinks. Yes he wants and needs to sell BANX because that helps fund all of the projects the company is working on (including mine). This is nothing to be ashamed of or knock someone for it is how businesses grow. Yes the company has income coming in, which mark happily has shown everyone (he didn't have to) and it is not just "20 entries of an excel file". With BANX (the blockchain) being moved to BTS (FACT: because I am the one doing it) is it really fair to give him a hard time 24/7? I don't think so!

He has already managed to create quite a few great resources for the community which you would see if you took off the hate blinders for a second. You don't have to like Mark or anyone else, you don't have to like Banx as a company, however it is disrespectful to not give credit to the things that are clearly being done.

So stop the hate and wait!

Anyway I am just here to give a heads up that i have completed the BTS 2.0 integration for Banx.io and should be finished testing it shortly so BTS should be live on Banx.io by the weekend.

Thank You

28
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Please vote for banxio witness node
« on: October 19, 2015, 05:32:42 pm »
Luckily the server will be running 24/7 anyway

29
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Please vote for banxio witness node
« on: October 19, 2015, 04:43:51 pm »
Yes I am the dev of banx.io, you don't have to support banx capital but supporting my node is good for bitshares and my projects. You would be voting for me as a developer since I am spending a lot of time on bitshares projects.

30
General Discussion / Re: ?migrate as gateway?
« on: October 19, 2015, 04:32:26 pm »
and... I am aware of what a gateway is... no offence but that last comment was less than helpful

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5