Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Tell her, we are no different then GEMZ
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=758004.0
They got an Iphone app
Just to set things straight here. I was asked weeks ago if I would be ready to have an article put through on STEEM via Forbes. I was also told that OpenLedger was meant to be first platform to trade STEEM.
None of this has happened, and whatever is the reason for BiTTREX to be the first, you all need to take up with the people orchestrating this, meaning @dannotestein @bytemaster @nedscott
I am enjoying to help promote BitShares and OL on top, but as I have mentioned in previous threads whenever there is a hidden agenda and i feel someone here have been playing on many horses and really made a bad impression on it all.
I hope it will improve soon in terms of how communication has been presented, and I hate to waste my own time and anyone else's for that matter thinking we are on the same page, when in fact someone has already witten the end of the story on his own.
@ccedk
Just tell us when deposits and withdrawal's are allowed on OL and we will take of OPEN.STEEM after that... don't worry!
Is it not already? I thought actually it was made possible a few days ago. Pls test it. Its hard for me to do much on this, as I have received very limited information all in all.
@bytemaster
@Bytemаsteг
Can you take care of this? (or somebody they listen to you)
I don't see any option to deposit or withdraw. Even if there is a way it is not easy to find.Please give the option on top of the page of each pair...
Is your wallet software open source?
the apps are closed-source and they are not bitcoin wallets like others, in other words it is a native mobile interface to the CoinsBank
mobile apps connected only to CB system via special secured API
I just received som BAD news for iOS users. The BitShares Wallet for iOS was denied by Apple.
They denied it because (apparently) it transmits a "virtual currency" that is not approved for the App Store. Secondly, they will not allow our app because it uses encryption to which they do not hold the keys (at least guess this is what they are trying to say).
Anybody have any idea what we should do next? Grrrrrrrrrrrrr
Code: [Select]
From Apple
11.17 - Apps may facilitate transmission of approved virtual currencies provided that they do so in compliance with all state and federal laws for the territories in which the app functions
Program License Agreement
11.17 Details
Your app facilitates the transmission of a virtual currency that is not approved for the App Store.
Next Steps
We encourage you to review your app concept and incorporate different content and features that are in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.
PLA 2.3
Additionally, we found that your Application Description states:
"Secured by the encrypted, fraud-proof BitShares blockchain."
However, your app does not have Export Compliance, which does not comply with the Apple Developer Program License Agreement, as required by the App Store Review Guidelines.
Section 2.3 of the Apple Developer Program License Agreement specifies,
"You certify that (i) none of the Licensed Applications contains, uses or supports any data encryption or cryptographic functions; or (ii) in the event that any Licensed Application contains, uses or supports any such data encryption or cryptographic functionality, You will, upon request, provide Apple with a PDF copy of Your Encryption Registration Number (ERN), or export classification ruling (CCATS) issued by the United States Commerce Department, Bureau of Industry and Security and PDF copies of appropriate authorizations from other countries that mandate import authorizations for that Licensed Application, as required."
Please review your app's encryption ability, and when resubmitting your binary, check the appropriate answers to the questions in the Export Compliance section of iTunes Connect. You may be asked some follow-on questions to determine the level of encryption in your app; you may also be asked to provide a copy of your CCATS.
If you have questions related to export compliance and your app's use of encryption, please contact the App Store Export Compliance team at appstore.ec[member=3065]apple[/member].com.
Ken,
I'm kind of confused by this. Did your team read the terms of service prior to working on the iOS App? Getting bitcoin wallets on iOS has been extremely difficult for the last several years and I wouldn't expect a bitshares app to be any easier. Granted coinbase got their app on iOS, but i'm sure they followed the terms. There are some other wallets as well on iOS, so maybe ask Apple why they were allowed in.
If they did it, and our technology in essence works the exact same way (encryption, blockchains, wallet transfers the tokens, etc) then why would they deny us? Yes, it might be difficult for them, but they must have said something or done something to help Apple to see the light.
I have contacted Apple directly via their Appeal process with that exact inquiry. A friendly message just asking what else we should do to get published in the App store just like all the other Bitcoin wallets out there. I will keep posting my progress with them here on the forum..
I thought the point of Steem was to attract users to trade a hot new token on OpenLedger, and they just use Bittrex instead?
It's the reasoning for CNX leaving that is dumb... They say there is no money available for development because of the anit-dilution (chinese) crowd. Yet CNX hasn't even put forth a proposal for anything (MAS, Bonds, Rate Limited Transactions).
This is what I dislike as well.
In order to create a 3-letter asset, the fee is 1,174,108 BTS. See https://cryptofresh.com/fees
Currently there are 1,422 BTS on the committee-account. See https://cryptofresh.com/u/committee-account
Even if this 1,422 BTS is permitted to be used to create the asset, we still need more than 1.17M BTS. How to get them? worker proposal? Or someone will donation?
By the way, if you have enough fund already, and willing to create the asset with that fund, you can change the owner of the asset to committee-account at any time.
It doesnt have to be 3 letters, it can be BitARS, which would cost aprox 1.500 for a lifetime member, I can create it and then transfer it to the Committe, however the real help here would be pushing the feed to the master so that the coin has a decentralized feed price, do you think this could be possible?
FYI: In order to avoid confusion between fiat BitAssets and their various fiat UIA counterparts, the BitAsset versions are displayed in the UI with "bit" as a prefix. So for example, instead of USD, it's bitUSD. The reason I'm pointing this out is because if you choose "BitARS" as your symbol, then it will display in the UI as bitBitARS. That doesn't seem desirable at all.
Thanks for that info..
I dont think paying more than 1.000.000 BTS for the asset is a viable option, unless we create a worker.. another option would be to create bitARGSP
So I could create ARGSP, which is a five letter word and cost me 1.500 bts aprox, then pass it on to the Committe, would that work?
Seems it would be most desirable to use the proper 3-character ISO code "ARS". Why not do a worker proposal to accomplish that?
Yes, I agree.
We can do a worker proposal, create the asset and pass it over to the Committee, or the Committe could create the worker proposal and create the smartcoin.
I prefer the second option personally, that way everything is more official. Also, the fees of creating this coin will go back to the network so there will be no dilution here.
I suppose if the worker doesnt get funded we always have the option of creating a 5 letter smart asset, but we would be like the bastard son of smartcoins hehe
In order to create a 3-letter asset, the fee is 1,174,108 BTS. See https://cryptofresh.com/fees
Currently there are 1,422 BTS on the committee-account. See https://cryptofresh.com/u/committee-account
Even if this 1,422 BTS is permitted to be used to create the asset, we still need more than 1.17M BTS. How to get them? worker proposal? Or someone will donation?
By the way, if you have enough fund already, and willing to create the asset with that fund, you can change the owner of the asset to committee-account at any time.
It doesnt have to be 3 letters, it can be BitARS, which would cost aprox 1.500 for a lifetime member, I can create it and then transfer it to the Committe, however the real help here would be pushing the feed to the master so that the coin has a decentralized feed price, do you think this could be possible?
FYI: In order to avoid confusion between fiat BitAssets and their various fiat UIA counterparts, the BitAsset versions are displayed in the UI with "bit" as a prefix. So for example, instead of USD, it's bitUSD. The reason I'm pointing this out is because if you choose "BitARS" as your symbol, then it will display in the UI as bitBitARS. That doesn't seem desirable at all.
Thanks for that info..
I dont think paying more than 1.000.000 BTS for the asset is a viable option, unless we create a worker.. another option would be to create bitARGSP
So I could create ARGSP, which is a five letter word and cost me 1.500 bts aprox, then pass it on to the Committe, would that work?
In order to create a 3-letter asset, the fee is 1,174,108 BTS. See https://cryptofresh.com/fees
Currently there are 1,422 BTS on the committee-account. See https://cryptofresh.com/u/committee-account
Even if this 1,422 BTS is permitted to be used to create the asset, we still need more than 1.17M BTS. How to get them? worker proposal? Or someone will donation?
By the way, if you have enough fund already, and willing to create the asset with that fund, you can change the owner of the asset to committee-account at any time.
It doesnt have to be 3 letters, it can be BitARS, which would cost aprox 1.500 for a lifetime member, I can create it and then transfer it to the Committe, however the real help here would be pushing the feed to the master so that the coin has a decentralized feed price, do you think this could be possible?
I'll bring out more statistics data, E.G. average spread per account, average volume, total show up time/duration, then the issuers will have a clearer picture.BTS/bitEUR score (formula is here https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21544.msg289590.html#msg289590)Code: [Select]2016-04-13
183696659.8428,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
113107835.0706,altfund
76662915.9213,liquidity-bot-mauritso
32650952.0400,bts-scotterNice work, @abit! The only comment I have is that we previously discussed rewarding balance between buy and sell side orders. So for example if a market makers scores 3000 on the bid side and 2000 on the ask side, they would get full credit for 2000 + 2000. And then we could apply some factor less than 1 to the remaining 1000 from the bid side score. I don't think the factor should be 0, but perhaps in the .25-.5 range. In the future we can do something more sophisticated that identifies the weak and strong sides of a market when it's trending, that way we can more heavily reward liquidity provided to the weak side.Thanks! Scoring of UIA pairs is on my to-do list.
By the way, can you test out your scoring on a UIA? Maybe OBITS since it's one of the most active? Thanks for your work on this, @abit!
According to https://cryptofresh.com/assets, in last 24 hours, the most active UIA:UIA pair is MKR:OPEN.BTC, the most active BTS pair is BTS:OPEN.BTC
UIA related pairs need to add some factors to the formula, I haven't figured out the final formula.
Doesn't really matter which UIA to test on as long as it has some good volume. But I did ask Ronny several days ago on another thread if he would be interested in using this and he said yes. I have no idea if @Rune would use it. Although I don't see why not!
Anyway, what about the point I brought up about taking into account balance between buy and sell side liquidity? Actually, I think it would be best for your script to simply produce 2 scores (one for the buy side, one for the sell side) and leave it at that. Then the issuer can apply their own "balance factor", which would be a very simple calculation that can be done in a spreadsheet. The issuer will already have to make some decisions about how to use the scoring data to begin with. For example, do they want to have a minimum score for a MM to qualify for a rewards? Do they want to reward only the top X number of MMs in a given period? Do they want to reward only those MMs who provided a minimum % of the total liquidity? Etc. This will all have to be up to the issuer, and they may try different things.
Buy and sell side will be calculated independently.
Some of the decisions you mentioned require modifications to the formula itself, fortunately it's not hard to change atm. To be more productive, it's best that the issuers come out and say what they want.
BTS/bitEUR score (formula is here https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21544.msg289590.html#msg289590)Code: [Select]2016-04-13
183696659.8428,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
113107835.0706,altfund
76662915.9213,liquidity-bot-mauritso
32650952.0400,bts-scotterNice work, @abit! The only comment I have is that we previously discussed rewarding balance between buy and sell side orders. So for example if a market makers scores 3000 on the bid side and 2000 on the ask side, they would get full credit for 2000 + 2000. And then we could apply some factor less than 1 to the remaining 1000 from the bid side score. I don't think the factor should be 0, but perhaps in the .25-.5 range. In the future we can do something more sophisticated that identifies the weak and strong sides of a market when it's trending, that way we can more heavily reward liquidity provided to the weak side.Thanks! Scoring of UIA pairs is on my to-do list.
By the way, can you test out your scoring on a UIA? Maybe OBITS since it's one of the most active? Thanks for your work on this, @abit!
According to https://cryptofresh.com/assets, in last 24 hours, the most active UIA:UIA pair is MKR:OPEN.BTC, the most active BTS pair is BTS:OPEN.BTC
UIA related pairs need to add some factors to the formula, I haven't figured out the final formula.
Define the formula for smart coins as (only count in one side: sell bitEUR & buy BTS):Code: [Select]account_score = sum(order_score)So,
order_score = volume * seconds * price_score(feed_price,order_price)
price_score =
if order_price < feed_price * 80%
then 0
else if order_price <= feed_price * 99%
then 100 / (1 - order_price / feed_price)
else
100 + 10000 * (order_price / feed_price - 0.99)
* price_score is 0 if order_price is less than 80% of feed_price
* price_score is 5 if order_price is 80% of feed_price
* price_score is 10 if order_price is 90% of feed_price
* price_score is 20 if order_price is 95% of feed_price
* price_score is 33 if order_price is 97% of feed_price
* price_score is 50 if order_price is 98% of feed_price
* price_score is 100 if order_price is 99% of feed_price
* price_score is 150 if order_price is 99.5% of feed_price
* price_score is 200 if order_price = feed_price
Then scores of BTS/bitEUR market in April are here:Code: [Select]2016-04-12@kenCode
184400378.7000,lin9uxis
158725194.2100,bts-scotter
48644049.8322,altfund
37088100.0000,mf-tzo
14851206.9189,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
13052533.0683,liquidity-bot-mauritso
3235363.3944,liquidity-bot-linouxis2
1367414.0955,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
2016-04-11
203062435.9842,bts-scotter
63045259.2621,altfund
28664143.6950,lin9uxis
10421922.3498,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
5889780.8652,liquidity-bot-mauritso
5057244.0000,mf-tzo
4649968.5468,liquidity-bot-linouxis2
4043822.3133,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
2016-04-10
641074500.0000,hugogoulart
307256636.3463,bts-scotter
105651130.2000,liondani
98901551.4495,hcf27
60203082.8904,altfund
9153766.9794,liquidity-bot-linouxis2
8539407.2832,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
7128896.5920,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
6013054.6734,liquidity-bot-mauritso
2609749.4892,lin9uxis
2256716.3844,liquidity-bot-bm
2016-04-09
516839795.8971,bts-scotter
254116500.0000,hugogoulart
46036964.3199,altfund
42258169.8000,liondani
8893063.7451,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
7583349.3258,liquidity-bot-mauritso
6019348.3032,hcf27
5872279.0644,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
5126273.1861,liquidity-bot-linouxis2
1843986.2718,liquidity-bot-bm
2016-04-08
402232130.1660,bts-scotter
216266250.0000,hugogoulart
113177815.4358,altfund
36026166.0000,liondani
18505503.4875,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
14579342.0448,hcf27
9433227.9429,liquidity-bot-mauritso
1256984.7966,liquidity-bot-gold21
820598.4297,gold-mine
631812.8628,liquidity-bot-linouxisbot
548911.6506,liquidity-bot-bm
2016-04-07
228067431.7239,bts-scotter
91298250.0000,hugogoulart
64178934.8070,altfund
24261388.8000,liondani
5664953.6586,liquidity-bot-mauritso2
5378275.7307,liquidity-bot-mauritso
1030284.2871,antman890
348001.2387,hcf27
74945.3340,liquidity-bot-gold21
2016-04-06
204159419.3772,bts-scotter
53689303.3404,altfund
22085322.6000,liondani
1019154.3606,antman890
647557.2120,mf-tzo
223506.2250,liquidity-bot-mauritso
2016-04-05
194139802.9065,bts-scotter
52144072.1850,altfund
21599146.8000,liondani
945507.3318,antman890
2016-04-04
228594201.3564,bts-scotter
62036456.5413,altfund
23930959.8000,liondani
1217967.2901,antman890
2016-04-03
275702980.5606,bts-scotter
28311683.4000,liondani
24672346.9869,altfund
321518.3616,antman890
2016-04-02
283152877.3458,bts-scotter
28497024.6000,liondani
16613545.7664,altfund
2016-04-01
250503237.4629,bts-scotter
27221079.6000,liondani
15580021.5384,altfund
1266542.7588,inarizushi
As long as where ever it is placed has room for others as well then I say go for it!
