Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gordonhucn

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 7: The Power of DPOS
« on: July 03, 2014, 02:36:44 am »
thanks a lot
Some fund pls to start testing :D
XTS5rnk29FBnCfNTsVtQCXs9jEAtxQTVY4taeiGBBCJFAmqipxS8v

thanks
sent

47
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 7: The Power of DPOS
« on: July 03, 2014, 02:04:48 am »
Some fund pls to start testing :D
XTS5rnk29FBnCfNTsVtQCXs9jEAtxQTVY4taeiGBBCJFAmqipxS8v

thanks

48
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 6: Great Scott!
« on: June 27, 2014, 03:35:52 am »
thanks dorian for the funds
will anyone send me some funds for testing please?

XTS7qoK7bKjjfRKB1w7a6tq2XyAsbBNvDt8QJ24wEXadZEPW519J2

thanks

49
General Discussion / Re: Dry Run 6: Great Scott!
« on: June 27, 2014, 03:21:04 am »
will anyone send me some funds for testing please?

XTS7qoK7bKjjfRKB1w7a6tq2XyAsbBNvDt8QJ24wEXadZEPW519J2

thanks

50
General Discussion / Re: Testing BitShares XT Launch...
« on: May 15, 2014, 12:51:48 am »
I downloaded the nightly build and try to open the wallet but it says that I'm missing MSVCP120.dll. Where can I get it?
Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40784

51
刚刚在比特币贴吧看到的 
仿照淘宝的模式,平台作为担保第三方,卖家先充值比特币到平台,平台先收币,平台收到币后通知买家已收币,然后买家通过和卖家的约定方式(转账现金都可以,看双方自己约定)支付,然后卖家确认收到钱通知平台,平台再放币给买家。平台收取一定比例的比特币

我想BTSX是不是应该找平台作为担保的第三方呢?

直接用比特币multisig地址,2/3的就ok了,买家卖家和担保方,
交易通过的(rmb到帐了)买方卖方都签名发给买方
交易有问题担保方出面可以决定转给买方或者卖方
但是无论如何担保方不能单方面拿到比特币

52
Random Discussion / Re: Larimers
« on: March 06, 2014, 02:56:21 am »
"Dan, I am your father ......."
"Nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!"


 Nooooooo!!!!!

LOL

53
General Discussion / Re: 不太理解法币怎么进出BTS系统呢?
« on: February 25, 2014, 05:57:46 pm »
法币需要托管是不可避免的,在证券里是银行三方托管,ripple里是托管到gateway上,btc和其他山寨币都是托管到交易所。bts与山寨同

54
not just today, but every day

55
just found this bug after their maintenance

56
General Discussion / Re: Confused about the margin call ~
« on: February 15, 2014, 03:09:44 pm »
This is the hardest part for many people to understand until they see it in action.   The reality is that every market player is constantly adjusting their assessment of the value of BitUSD based upon their observations of USD / BTS.   The thing that ties them together is market consensus and this is a concept that takes a degree of intuition to understand. 

Your suggesting is a 'price feed' from a trusted source to be used to settle positions and is what all of our competitors feel is necessary.  But if our hypothesis is correct these feeds are unnecessary.

If we rely on people's believes or confidence , then a sudden flash crash kind of accident will break the belief/confidence and hard to recover. Take a look at all the derivatives, futures and options will have the expected trend going along with the underlying's price because they are settled/executed based on underlying's price, index derivatives are settled with cash rather than index(which is only a concept rather than a physically existed equity) and it works fine because they are settled by "FEED PRICE OF UNDERLYING", it is not only about margin and collateral, it is also about how to finish the strike/execution and settlement. I still think that a "realUSD price feed" from a trusted exchange with suitable volume will be a stronger and more solid foundation for the PEG mechanism. With this simple linkage from realUSD and bitUSD, it will give arbitraging people a guarantee that they will have their profit realized once they do it right, instead of praying for all market participants to believe in the same thing they do.

57
General Discussion / Re: Confused about the margin call ~
« on: February 15, 2014, 02:55:30 pm »
Both rates will be floating and have their separate markets.

BTS in real USD on external exchanges (from Cryptsy to BTCe etc.)
BTS in BitUSD internally.

What I understand is, if both those markets are liquid arbitrage is possible and will be done to keep the realUSD to bitUSD ratio constant. In a second step just the mere threat of arbitrage being possible should keep the market in track.

If the external market breaks the internal market might lose tracking. Or in other words you won't be able to interpret the BTS/BitUSD ratio in regards to whether it reflects changes value of BTS or BitUSD.

You can see this happening now on MtGox: GoxBTC and GoxUSD are swinging wildly and not tracking realBTC and realUSD very well.

For goxUSD to keep track of realUSD, gox must be able to settle the IOU they issued. when goxUSD is not settlable then actually it is not tied to realUSD anymore. For people who do the arbitrage of realUSD and bitUSD is based on that they all believe bitUSD and realUSD are highly co-integrated, and they all believe that all players believe that bitUSD and realUSD are highly co-integrated. This will work for a while until a sudden flash crash, in which case that it will be very hard for bitUSD to get back to tracking realUSD. That is why i strongly suggested to do the margin call with realUSD price which will link readUSD to bitUSD even realUSD is never physically exchanged to bitUSD, but the margin system will keep them the same trend. In such a way that the arbitraging people will carry out their business with belief of the system rather than the belief of what people think everyone believes.

58
General Discussion / Confused about the margin call ~
« on: February 14, 2014, 05:29:52 pm »
I don't know if I understand the code in github correctly or accurate enough, correct me if I am not. Some thoughts as below:

How does the market price BTS(in real USD)? It is from the expectation of all players who would trade BTS from/to real cash.
How does the market price bitUSD(in BTS)? It is from the expectation of all players who bet on bitUSD with BTS.

But currently those two prices have nothing in connection except that we hope they can be connected.

What if we use the price of BTS in real USD to deal all margin calls instead of the price of bitUSD? I think that would give a connection to bitUSD and real USD. And someone who pays real USD can finish arbitrages if bitUSD differs from USD to some level.


59
General Discussion / Re: what do you think about counterparty(XCP)?
« on: February 14, 2014, 03:15:15 am »
It is based on bitcoin blockchain, it is just like MSC with some improvements, it is fundamentally different from BTS and Ethereum. It has its own unsolvable problems , there are detailed information from "metacoin" section in ethereum white paper. I don't see a long term future of it.

60
General Discussion / Re: BitAsset Predictions & Speculation
« on: February 14, 2014, 02:58:48 am »
For 2) when one side of bitUSD owner wins all , why can't we simply give the winer all the BTS and destroy the winer's bitUSD. If the winer wants to keep going with bitUSD, he can just bet again with someone else.

Because this isn't a pairing system, BitUSD is fungible for all users in the system.   What I do is use 100% of the BTS to BUY as much BitUSD on the market as I can and that is functionally equivalent... so instead of the loss being born by a single BitUSD holder it is spread across all BitUSD holders.

In a system that has all users' asset cost and holding-time, when the loss goes above the line then the system knows who(both wining side and losing side) should be kicked out of the game base on a weighted-evaluation rule over the cost / holding-time of everyone's asset. In such way every contract is backed which is assured by the system.

So it is not exactly equivalent , your way offers choices to the winers, the market and players with different expectation will solve the PEG eventually.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5