Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Shentist

Pages: 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
1486
General Discussion / Re: On a mission to get more links and buzz
« on: August 12, 2014, 06:26:48 pm »
thanks gentso

i will pm you when its done.

1487
General Discussion / Re: On a mission to get more links and buzz
« on: August 12, 2014, 05:54:25 pm »
There are two types of options for inclusion in Cointelegraph’s “Altcoin Catalog” section:
1. Free placement. It includes:
a. 100 word press-release
b. Official Altcoin logo
c. A link to your website

so for the 100 word press release  - do we have some teaser 100 words for this section?




so the premium section is also a possibility. Would cost 2.5 BTC. I ask already for traffic data, to be sure what we could expect.

2. Premium placement. It includes:
a. High-quality independent research and review by one of our journalists
b. Interview with representatives of developers team
c. Unique picture in CT style
d. Links to your website
e. Links to social media and community websites
f. A weekly review of recently added Altcoins
g. Top placement above other “Free” placements

1488
General Discussion / Re: FDIC for BitUSD
« on: August 12, 2014, 05:30:44 am »
I'm not sure people understand how monumental 3) is.

So, here is the design I had in mind, when contemplating an alternative to BitShares X.

Let's say the unit is U for simplicity.

BTC -> U cross-chain conversion is allowed in the chain itself through smart contracts. Not like XCP or MSC, but delegates/smart oracles would ensure proper conversion between BTC and U.

Then from U you have ability to convert to v.USD (which is your BitUSD). I'll just use BitUSD since it's more familiar with the audience.

Huge difference here is that, instead of expecting a market depth to get created, market feeds are used to let the DAC itself issue BitUSD by destroying U.

When user wants to liquidate BitUSD, it gets converted back to U, but that's done by the DAC itself, which provides LIQUIDITY!

It does it with 2% around the median market feed, so it still allows for people to bet within the spread, but if some heavy buy or sell comes in, it can not spook the market.

Value of unit U: Why hold it at all? Well it receives dividents from all the trades. (similar to BTSX)


Major difference between my design and 3) is that the DAC itself provides liquidity. While BTSX expects the market to provide that.

UPDATE: although 3) is a step in that direction (DAC providing liquidity)


in short the DAC is the marketmaker!

maybe a needed function

1489
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Website name. Brainstorming
« on: August 11, 2014, 09:17:07 pm »
bitshares jukebox

1490
my too :D

1491
General Discussion / Re: RE: 8/21 DUAL SNAPSHOT, Now What?
« on: August 11, 2014, 09:01:36 pm »
great work +5%

one point (sry)

i would like it better if any text would readable without to take my head in a 90 degree angle

1492
KeyID / Re: New Site -- help with content
« on: August 11, 2014, 08:52:38 pm »
toast assign the homepage to someone you trust and knows what he is doing.

what can someone with no github experience do? only know something to mess around wordpress and then the knowledge ends.


1493
Charles, Dan, and Stan should work together along with Brian to devise a effective marketing plan.  When I look at Stellar's launch a week ago, I believe Bitshares could learn from its launch.  Do you guys agree?  Let me know your thoughts.

Hadn't heard of Stellar. Wouldn't touch it with a barge pole myself. Huge Sharedrops, which so far have only crashed coins, and often seem to be a mechanism to reward devs while trying to appear fair, such as NEM, even sceptical of some others...

This is probably the funniest thing I've read in a while -

Quote
The Foundation received a loan of $3,000,000 from Stripe which was subsequently repaid with 2% of the stellars. The Foundation is allowed to use up to 5% of the initial stellars to fund operations (including the loan repayment). 

That would mean Stripe needs Stellar to be worth $150 000 000 just to break even? Like hell they made that initial investment on those terms imo.

The Stellar share drop via Facebook was a great way to market.  The clean interface and straight forward signup process gave ordinary people the opportunity to obtain the new currency.  As a result, many people outside of the crypto community now has Stellar.  I don't think we can say the same for Bitshares.  See the Stellar statshttps://www.stellar.org/stats/.  I just hope we can borrow some aspects from this project and leverage them to our benefit.

I just want BitShares to succeed and adoption is critical to accomplish this end.
I think share drops via facebook are great and so are faucets but we need to find cost effective ways to get people excited about WE are doing. Does anyone feel like there is a buzz around Nxt,XMR,Ether, heck even the Stellar thread on bitcointalk is 45 pages. While we post (hit about 5 pages )about exciting things and no one seems to care but us........

I don't think the issue is with our technology it's with the fact that
a.pts/ags make it simple
b.forum is a mess (we all know it), even if we get them to come they can't find any information quickly
c.Marketing???  ::)
d.Image   

i don't see people here only complaining. here are a lot who are willing to help.

my points:
1. someone has to get control to the forum who has time and is willing to put some links and threads together - costs nothing. But it seems no one at I3 is willing to set someone in charge.
2. Marketing - i hope everything is fine in the future, but what i can't see and touch i don't trust. i am not against this way, but i don't understand why ignore the brick and mortar way of building something.

@cass
i don't complain i ask, but no one is willing to give a fact answer. only say everything is good and something big is coming is not my style. i started @bitshareshub at twitter by the way, because i think it is a easy way for me to contribute in the future to change the focus of maybe 1,2,3 people and they will talk about bitshares as well and so on.

1494
would be great a moderator could stick this post at the top of the "Bank & Exchange" section

1495
he is NOT stepping down.. just not taking sallery from i3 :)

Ok. Great. Maybe now that he isn't getting paid, marketing productivity will increase. /s

it is not correct . do you really believe he will not be get paid on a contract base from I3?

Come on dudes -- what's up here? .. Brian isn't out of BitShares! He's optimizing workflow to help on more stages IMO!

I've noticed same a few weeks before... When working for III as an employee then it isn't possible to help other DACs devs on startup their companies.
So i've decided to work as a Contractor.  (max flexibility). Guessing Brian noticed same issues and also wants to help on more hot spots!

my 2 BTSX


He is moving from employee to independent entrepreneur with the same task but powerful new incentives and capabilities.

please correct me if Im wrong, wasn't the whole point of I3's existence and the AGS fund to "bootstrap" the DAC sector?

No offense, but the Marketing Director hasn't done much in terms of marketing and now that he is stepping down at a critical time like this, just seems odd and suspect. I am pretty sure people called for his resignation and he refused only to leave during critical times?



you nailed it! sry to say it again. the problem here is not Brian stepping down, but how the whole job is done. this is a community driven project.

i want to see the contact lists he made for us with "our" money? as his employer (ok, it is really over the top  ;) ) i want to have his contact datas, what was he working etc. it is not only Brians "problem" . I3 is in this point not open enough. Only to tell "something big is comming" is not enough. success comes with hard work and i see hard work on the coding side of bitshares, but without some data from parts like marketing it is only just hot air! maybe i am not big enough to get heard, or my english is as bad as i assume .

1496
good point gamey, but

wtf is a wif key :D i will google it (please consider maybe in this kind i am a noob)

1497
You guys should seriously consider moving in a different direction with your marketing. This is a golden opportunity to have that conversation. Why don't you involve the community you currently have and come up with a stronger marketing plan.

 +5%

if i would leave my company everything i done i has to give to my replacement. i hope we will see something. i was not a big fan of brian, because everything was done in secret no updates at all to the community. this working behavior is not the best for a community driven product. i hope I3 will choose better and in all parts I3 will open up more.


1498
mir persönlich sind deine 10 mio zu hoch gegriffen. am btsx start hat man gesehen, dass die marktkapitalisierung doch eher am unteren Ende ist. ich persönlich hoffe auf 5 millionen.

beim letzten mal ist der PTS preis "massiv" nach dem snapshot eingebrochen, was dieses mal passiert kann keiner wissen. zur zeit ist glaube ich nur Hackfishers Bitshares Games in der Planung von anderen konkreten Projekten ist mir derzeit nichts bekannt, daher könnte sehr viel "Fantasie" aus dem PTS Preis genommen werden.

1499
General Discussion / Re: On a mission to get more links and buzz
« on: August 10, 2014, 07:52:17 pm »
This is pretty cool. Maybe email Brian directly as he may not be checking the forum.

i don't know brians email. on the official bithsares.org page only press@bitshares.org is posted. and if he really is not checking the marketing thread it is terrible or we need one more person.

1500
Technical Support / Re: Introduction and Question
« on: August 10, 2014, 07:31:33 pm »
hi keyser

the bitshares X wallet is released. you will find it bitshares-x.info

you can import your privat keys here. with pts i got now problem, armory wallet ist not function at the moment.

Pages: 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107