Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Shentist

Pages: 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 [106] 107
1576
General Discussion / Re: Can not get Windows client to open without crashing....need help!
« on: July 24, 2014, 06:03:18 pm »
here windows 7 64 bit everything is fine. maybe something you installed. i set up a windows machine exlusive for crypto with nothing extra installed.

1577
General Discussion / Re: RDPOS - Recommended Delegated Proof of Stake
« on: July 24, 2014, 05:31:46 am »
1. at the moment i choose some delegates with little fees, but honestly i don't know i 5% or 100% is required to operate the delegate. maybe you can add how much fees this delegate will earn with his fee structure in 1 month or so. then maybe everyone could see if 100% or 5% is required or are 100% delegates just greedy.

2. why not force the network user to vote?

"at the moment you picked zero delegates. please be aware that to pick  trustworthy delegates are an importent job to secure the network. your transaction will be delate for x time as long as you are not voting"

something like that?

1578
General Discussion / Re: RDPOS - Recommended Delegated Proof of Stake
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:46:30 pm »
the weak point in ripple you see, is the "cartel" of old friends, for new people are impossible to get in. will this slate ID not decrease the chance for newcomers to get one of the 101 delegate seats?

1579
BitShares PTS / Re: PTS has been rated BUY
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:37:56 pm »
maybe some people are selling PTS to buy cheap BTSX. If you calculate the math at the lost marketcap from the 28 Feb. Snapshot is BTSX a bargain. I don't get the sellers, but maybe i miss something too.

1580
General Discussion / is network_add_node required to sync?
« on: July 22, 2014, 06:09:11 pm »
i installed the btsX wallet but could not sync. only after i added manuelly network nodes it functions. So is it always required or did i miss something importend?

1581
General Discussion / Re: Need Help Sourcing Information on BitShares
« on: June 30, 2014, 06:04:05 am »
Quote
Lol, how many millions did you guys raise again? Alright, well this is going to be a fun exercise.

in my opinion you started it. Maybe willingly.

in one post you want to get information, but at the second you explained in detail why this communtiy is not good. So you following at all and already knew all the information?

Good luck and end of communication

1582
General Discussion / Re: BitShares PTS2 - Community Input Thread
« on: May 21, 2014, 05:20:35 am »
everyone seems confused - me too!

10% PTS and 10% AGS at least for new DACs from Invictus so far

what happens when PTS 2 is released?


1583
KeyID / Re: Namecoin airdrop?
« on: May 04, 2014, 04:22:00 pm »
i don't like the idea of an airdrop - why?

many people who are not interested in this project will hold coins. I would prefer the give them to people who has an interest.

how we could do this?

maybe we could make a fundraiser with namecoin instat. Before the genesis block is created we will take a fundraiser for the namecoin holders like the fundraiser in AGS. Timeframe maybe 30 days. 20-30%. No share in DNS for Devs, because the fundraiser will give them the needed funds for development. We could increase the user base, we could create media buzz and get funding for the dev team without the "premined" terminology.

1584
KeyID / Re: Pre-allocate share as "Dev DNS"?
« on: April 05, 2014, 10:26:51 pm »
i would like to see 50/50 as earlier said, but keep 10% of the transaction fees for the deverlopers. i see 2 good points for this split

1. 50/50 you said it already and i don't like to change something it was already said.
2. 10% of the transaction fees will fund the project on the longrun. If the chain is succesful the developers have a source of a steady income and will make a much bigger impact
for a succesful chain.

I think with this kind of solution both partys (investors and developers) will benefit much more.

1585
General Discussion / Re: Bitshare roughly estimated at $100
« on: March 21, 2014, 06:27:01 am »
we will see.

depends all for the motivation of the buyer and how they funded AGS investment. In my example i bought btc at this time and converted it in AGS donation. So in the short run i will not sell under 10 US $ because i would lose money. If we see 20 US $? I am bullish at BTS, but maybe i sell some to cover the costs. Success of the project is not 100%, so it will depends on the added feature to add value es well.

1586
BitShares PTS / Re: Buying PTS after 2/28 will give me the bitshares-pts too?
« on: March 06, 2014, 06:22:44 am »
Person A

- holds 100 PTS over 2.28.2014 - 1.31.2014 (Snapshot was taken)
- now he will receive about 133 Bitshares-X with his privat PTS key when the Bitshares-X wallet is available

Person B

- bought 100 PTS 3.3.2014 form Person A and now he gets 0 Bitshares-X, but he will get all future DACs


1587
General Discussion / Re: BitShares X Product Roadmap - AGS/PTS Snapshots and More!
« on: February 17, 2014, 07:52:39 pm »
60 day a 10.000 ags shares = 600.000 ags and 10.000 shares for keyhotee = 610.000 ags for the funding period

but how do you allocate the last 1.390.000 ags ?

1. 1.390.000 / 60 =23.166,67 ags more each day

or

2. 1.390.000 / 600.000 = 2,32 ags more each ags

only allocaten 1. will be a fair allocation, because it will honor the different days. or can i just throw some btc in the last day and get 2.32 ags each ags i get for my day?

on the longrun, you should talk this decisions with your community. you change a lot and the most people don't like change. the only solution i could think about. first talk and take the tought of the community and then you can change.

1588
Marketplace / Re: 1 PTS Analogy Bounty for How BitShares X works to peg BitUSD to USD
« on: January 15, 2014, 08:46:36 pm »
Quote
Think about quantum entanglement. You can bind anything together and they doing the same. As example USD/EUR is entangled to BitUSD/BitEUR. So you get a old correlation in a decentralised environment.


Sorry for my bad english :D

1589
BitShares AGS / Re: Should 3i stop BTC investment of AngelShares?
« on: January 11, 2014, 07:43:09 am »
it is absolutly impossible to change the condition midway. what do you talking about? it will damage the project over a point without return and will never get back the trust of anybody. you would have to refund every transaction. so now you have to think about what do you want? i like PTS more then AGS. If i need money or the project will go a way i don't like i can sell PTS and BTS. With AGS i am doomed forever  :) in good times and in bad times.

1590
BitShares AGS / Re: Angeladdress PTS rewarded with BTS?
« on: January 09, 2014, 06:57:22 pm »
Quote
Question i came up with when looking at the daily PTS AGS auction.

Will this Angel PTS also be available for the BTS conversion or will only the PTS excluded from the Angeladdress be able to get their BTS share?

Looks like if the same ratio goes on till the end of the auction 1/3 of total PTS willbe in hands of Invictus again. This is ofcourse not a problem but it will be a double topping because this auction PTS can be used to get BTS also which makes it a double income for Invictus. This gives me mixed feelings....

What you guys think of what should be done?

when the day comes for the first BTS chain and 200 Days are over. With this ratio the PTS address "PaNGELmZgzRQCKeEKM6ifgTqNkC4ceiAWw" holds 500k PTS. So 500k BTS will be rewarded to this address, if you see it this way it will be a double spending, because the public key of "PaNGELmZgzRQCKeEKM6ifgTqNkC4ceiAWw" is in the hands of invictus. This is much better then more value will be in hands of Invictus to push harder and faster.

Pages: 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 [106] 107

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 24 queries.