Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mitao

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8
31
General Discussion / Re: The owner of the account "bter" is a canadians
« on: January 22, 2015, 04:07:41 am »

Quote from: BTSdac on January 22, 2015, 04:03:54 am
Quote from: mitao on January 22, 2015, 04:00:29 am
I hate scam, but.... This whole process just make me feel you are trying to play a central bank's role. Should this role even exist in a decentralized system?
not a central bank,
just he (scam) expose his track by chating with us

Got it, thx for explanation.

32
General Discussion / Re: The owner of the account "bter" is a canadians
« on: January 22, 2015, 04:06:22 am »
Sooo, if I don't like you and you are not covering carefully, dev can get lots of personal information? I'm not saying anything wrong here? But what's next? Seize his account? Or public his ID?

33
General Discussion / Re: The owner of the account "bter" is a canadians
« on: January 22, 2015, 04:00:29 am »
I hate scam, but.... This whole process just make me feel you are trying to play a central bank's role. Should this role even exist in a decentralized system?

34
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 比特股的失败之处是首先没有铆钉推广实物比如石油 推出的比特美元人民币又没有实际波动价值
« on: January 15, 2015, 03:12:58 am »
三星是啥项目？

35
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 云币交易所竞选贴
« on: January 13, 2015, 05:52:13 am »
和你们比起来 西方的受托人早该下岗了


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

36
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 宣传达人Chen.Haonan的竞选宣言
« on: January 13, 2015, 03:26:11 am »
哥们早不来 就等你呢

37
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: "Traffic Generation Machine" Week 1 Results
« on: January 12, 2015, 04:00:39 am »
Good job, you should be here 5months earlier.

38
General Discussion / Re: Is Bitshares Undervalued by 20 times (20x)? YES (ARTICLE)
« on: January 05, 2015, 03:23:58 am »
Are we up voting an article stating "Bitshares is worth $34.6 million while Ripple is worth roughly $2 BILLION and they are almost exactly the same." ?

39
General Discussion / Re: Default Vote for Core Devs???
« on: January 04, 2015, 12:28:43 am »
Some of the names has never or rarely come to forum. So the users have to trust them because Dan trust them? Why can't they post their own proposal? This thread is not merely centralization, you are trying to become a king.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

40
General Discussion / Re: How to make payroll without multiple delegates per developer
« on: January 03, 2015, 03:25:24 am »

Quote from: HRickover on January 03, 2015, 02:47:28 am
Quote from: bytemaster on January 02, 2015, 05:22:34 pm
I am sorry, but this kind of legalistic penny pinching will kill BTS and hurt morale.   
Incentives are aligned

Sure, "incentives are aligned"  :)

I will be as honest as possible (as always). I was virtually searching for the final straw, to divest at least 1/3 from my favorite project...

- 15 Mil BTS and 100K annual pay for the marketing guy that did nothing...The incentives are aligned. 


- 500-700 K USD for the marketing guy, cause he is 'VOTE' and the next better thing than BTS... (but do not worry he is not getting 2K/mo. delegate, so he is OK).

- 3Mil BTS bonus for Stan, for posting obscure and/or condescending comments on the forum.

- 3Mil BTS bonus for Agent86 for almost finishing an article in 45 days; [striving for the most expensive piece of literature I guess]


- as far as developers go.... well drltc will need 4 delegates voted in to get a fair compensation, after Feb15th. That of course was needed for no other reason but to  get all of the above 'greater good' achieved!



If this is not example of 'The incentives are aligned', I really do not know what is!

Yep, the incentives are aligned. Lol

41
General Discussion / Re: Year End Developer Bonuses
« on: January 01, 2015, 12:53:25 am »
Are devs free to leave the project if they want?

42
DAC PLAY / Re: [Announcement]BitShares PLAY Crowdfunding
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:21:54 am »
This sucks...won't send a penny to you.

43
Random Discussion / Re: This sucks....
« on: December 28, 2014, 02:21:03 pm »
It sucks that this kind of shitty post in General Discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

44
General Discussion / Re: Ripple goes from adjacent-possible to REAL.
« on: December 20, 2014, 03:05:18 am »
Fidor bank...hmmm far from mainstream

45
General Discussion / Re: ripple rally
« on: December 18, 2014, 04:17:50 am »

Quote from: alexkravets on December 17, 2014, 10:46:12 pm
Quote from: Rune on December 17, 2014, 08:53:27 pm
I think it would make more sense for us to make an XRP gateway on the bitshares network. Then XRP could be easily traded against bitUSD too. We might even want to have bitXRP.

This is great, but keep in mind this:

Ripple Labs needs bitXRP MUCH LESS than Bitshares needs a BTS gateways inside Ripple.

Currently BTS liquidity is really poor because essentially there's only btc38 clunky chinese exchange trading it for CNY and a little for BTC. 

This is unacceptable. 

By simply installing RL's gateways software, BTS will suddenly become quoted and tradable vs. millions of dollar's worth of daily liquidity. 

All without fees, but even better ... you'll be able to send BTS to your BTC brain wallets and get auto-conversion on the fly ! 
Think that over again ... 

What are the steps today to sell off some BTS ?

1. Go to btc38 and open an account.
2. Sell some BTS for CNY    (pay fee & spread)
3. Sell those CNYs for BTC  (pay fee & spread)
4. Send those BTCs out (3 btc at a time ! cumbersome btc38 requirement) to your coinbase/circle account (pay withdrawal fee)
5. Sell those BTCs to deposit into your USD account.

This is just way too crazy ...

I do know that some "onramps/offramps" are in the works according to bytemaster but until then (and even afterwards !)

BTS gateway inside Ripple would be nice.

Remember liquidity begets liquidity, conversely once liquidity disappears everything disappears ... just ask Mastercoin

Very correct, thank you

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 23 queries.