Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hybridd

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
16
Freebie / Re: ShareBits Announcement / Update Log
« on: December 26, 2015, 05:47:54 pm »
Updates to Share Drop Platform:

Due to issues we've realized during the holidays, we've had time to diagnose various bugs as well as make improvements to the software with the help up updates that have occurred to cryptofresh.

- Generating a quote should be near instant now (no long loading time, you could even share drop on BTS!)
- Your receipt now contains a link to your transaction(s) on CryptoFresh
- Your receipt now lists if a person didn't hold enough of the asset you dropped on to receive a share drop.

This update should be live within the next 1-2 hours.

17
Freebie / Re: Wrong Sharedrop Amount
« on: December 26, 2015, 02:43:52 am »
Should be fixed now can you confirm?

18
Freebie / Re: Wrong Sharedrop Amount
« on: December 25, 2015, 11:20:34 pm »
Nvm I misunderstood. Its due to a change cryptofresh made ill fix it when im home.

19
Freebie / Re: Wrong Sharedrop Amount
« on: December 25, 2015, 11:16:40 pm »
The quote u get is only for the system ignore it look at the receipt. The quote represents how much of the asset youre dropping on is held by that person.

20
Freebie / Re: funding my sharebot account.
« on: December 25, 2015, 05:00:15 am »
Fixed, sorry for delay!

21
Freebie / Re: funding my sharebot account.
« on: December 24, 2015, 09:42:30 pm »
Will investigate, thanks.

It seems our node is not in sync, our last received tx was 20,000 BTSFCX from 5 days ago.. I've reported it to kuro, he says he will take a look into it shortly.

22
Bitshares is a decentralized exchange with UIAs MPA and Private MPAs.

It is not a decentralized crypto-currency exchange yet however.

The only functions for other crypto currency currently is things like meta and block to convert BTC etc into BTS so that then you can participate in markets here.

I was just having this conversation this weekend with someone regarding bunkermining.

In our current state to start having altcoins trade here someone would have to basically accept the alt (thats centralized), would have to liquidate whatever they got into BTS via another centralized exchange, and then borrow from a private MPA market using the BTS as collateral. You can't do a 1:1 either. You would have to have 175% or so in value against whatever the alt is. Some alts are running some ok volume, but others are down to like $50 a day in volume.

SO at present, anybody who wants to setup a market for alt coins right now doesn't have the incentive to do it because it is a bad deal for whom ever runs it. I haven't even touched on the regulations issue in the US as of September this year that this brings into the picture.

This is not a lack of advertising... we just are not setup for this specific use case in a way that makes a good business case.

Oh.. there is also using UIAs of course.. but you are back to centralized again in that situation where you hope and pray who ever is holding the real thing is really holding it. Every time I have had this conversation with people... there was always push back about using the UIAs too.

The only way to make this work well is to spend a fair amount of money and have a hardfork. Anybody here remember the proposal for the decentralized wallet network for alts from last month? That would have facilitated what we are talking about here. The worker proposal got struck down with vengeance though. It's dust remains lay in waste for all to see: http://cryptofresh.com/workers (#9:#14)

you're overcomplicating the matter, this entire fiasco could be resolved with a single centralized service, however great trust is needed here and well at the end of the day isnt a single shred of trust what always has everyone so twisted in crypto?

All that would need to be done if willing to use an asset say called altBTC which a fairly large supply. Look at proof of burn: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_burn for each alt coin a PoB address is used, and being monitored. A user enters our centralized website, and says "hey this is my address for X (where X is some coin, BTC, DOGE, w/e).. and this Y is my bts address". We list PoB addresses for all the coins we want to accept. A user sends their funds to the proof of burn address, and a bot monitors all the addresses, when it sees a new transaction on X's PoB, it then sends the equivalent market-value amount of altBTC to Y.

altBTC gets its value from the sense that some real crypto currency had to be burned to obtain since a currency, "X" is being burned.

The issue with this is who holds the supply of altBTC? Whats to prevent this person from stealing some of this altBTC once stealth tx's exist? What's to prevent them from dumping some on the market? Etc.

23
Fixed an issue with case-sensitivity with miners' BTS 2.0 addresses
Removed the color white from the charts
Added txid to payments log / database

24
.. I feel silly now thanks ._.

25
I can't really seem to find a straightforward answer for this (or how to do it), so if anyone could provide any insight it'd be really helpful.

Thanks in advance!!

26
Fixed, sorry for the down time.. a payout should be occurring fairly soon with a hefty amount since some of the cryptsy btc that was held up has been flowing in.

27
just one more thing I noticed on the getting started page there's a typo under sha for normal diff there 8192 for the port it's 3339

where do you see that?
k either I'm going crazy or it's been changed the other day when I was looking at the getting started for the different ports the norm diff for sha256 said 8192 but anyway I think the pool running great I haven't had no issues connecting or with hashrate outside of the issue with cryptsy seems payments are running good you guys did a good job getting it up and running seems any little glitches that where found was fixed petty quick

You're not, I did indeed change it :P and thanks for the positive feed back! If only we had started open-testing sooner, I think we could've resolved a lot of the issues more early on, but regardless we're on the right track.

28
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] For those who care to know
« on: December 16, 2015, 06:20:55 pm »
Hey guys.  I was just trying out the Sharebits system and clicked on Tip Generator for the UIA.  I can't find the link anymore and it says the amount I was planning to tip is unclaimed.  How can I either reclaim it or get the url link again?  How do we pass the url to someone? 

Also I assume for the forums we just type the following: #btstip  [name] [amount] [UIA] ?  (without the brackets)

You can do it with or without quotes around the name?

Thanks.

All unclaimed tips get refunded to the tip issuer after 48 hours. I'm not sure what you mean by how you pass the url to someone... however you want? Skype, facebook, etc... lol

The syntax for the forum is no longer #btstip but rather #sharebits other than that, yes that's correct. Quotes around the name isn't required, but you will need it for names that have spaces.

29
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] For those who care to know
« on: December 15, 2015, 09:31:14 am »
e.g. I don't know if the bot is trustless or it's able to run away with my tips.
It is not able to run away with your tips to my knowledge.  The system was largely built to be trustless as @kuro112 @Freebieservers and @hybridd roll that way.  They work with gamers...who also tend to be a demographic full of little hackers who like to cheat and gain substantial advantages using a whole slew of the most cutting edge attacks in the space (for some odd reason), so I am confident that their skillsets are very competent in accomplishing this.  Of course that doesn't mean people are not allowed to test and attack it...I mean its going to happen anyway. 

Interestingly, the only person on this forum who could potentially steal from you would be a moderator who reads your pms and grabs your security code (because it is sent to you via pm on this forum)

This isn't entirely true as fav points out (further down I quoted him), it is entirely possible that someone who has control of the deposit account could do something malicious with them. The other points of failure are as (close to what) you pointed out, administrators not moderators.

From what I know at present, it will earn revenue in two ways (though it is in beta and at present is not earning anything to my knowledge):
A)  when users withdraw to their wallet, a small % of the funds will be paid to do so.
B)  if User A receives a tip and has no wallet, they can create one directly from the site through OpenLedger.info.  If/when they do this, the bot's wallet will be the referrer and will share some referral fees gained from OpenLedger.

A is sort of correct... it's not a % but rather a fairly fixed value. B... is not a question I know the answer to.


e.g. I don't know if the bot is trustless or it's able to run away with my tips.
It is not able to run away with your tips to my knowledge.  The system was largely built to be trustless as @kuro112 @Freebieservers and @hybridd roll that way.  They work with gamers...who also tend to be a demographic full of little hackers who like to cheat and gain substantial advantages using a whole slew of the most cutting edge attacks in the space (for some odd reason), so I am confident that their skillsets are very competent in accomplishing this.  Of course that doesn't mean people are not allowed to test and attack it...I mean its going to happen anyway. 

Interestingly, the only person on this forum who could potentially steal from you would be a moderator who reads your pms and grabs your security code (because it is sent to you via pm on this forum)

And that's exactly why 2FA will be worked on, from my understanding.

the owner of sharebitsio can run with the money = centralized and not trust less. I don't think there's a way to get around this, multi sig maybe, but that would void (fast) withdrawals.

2FA only protects you from outside intrusion, the main account holder could still go rogue.

please correct me if I am wrong

What you are saying is entirely true. There is no easy way to create a fully trustless system for this without us going very far out of our way to do so. The bitshares blockchain api doesn't provide an easy method to do so. If it were possible to create "sub accounts" (I'd have to greatly explain what I mean here, but I see no point cause it's not like someone's about to do some huge work on the block chian to make this possible) then a trustless system becomes more feasible.

Imo anyways, centralized isn't really a bad thing when people can be held accountable if shit hits the fan.

30
k so that's why I only received a small payout after mining for 5 days without one is because craptsy is holding up withdrawals it not your fault thanks for the updates it sucks cause it just seemed everything was going well that the exchange had to get us outside of that the ports I'm running on seem to be good

Yeah that's correct. We have really around 0.1 BTC to be distributed, but about 0.06-0.07 BTC of that is being held by Cryptsy. The distribution that happened today was only worth around 0.036 BTC.

It looks like the modified payment model is indeed working... it's just unfortunate that Cryptsy is in the position it's currently in. We've eliminated using them entirely from out system now.

Still need to update the "getting started" page with x11 and sha256 instructions.
Seems I overlooked this, I'll look into this in the morning, thx.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11