Code: [Select]

Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
    <system.web>
        <customErrors mode="Off"/>
    </system.web>
</configuration>

Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.


<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
    <system.web>
        <customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
    </system.web>
</configuration>

Actually getting this error msg on the payout page.

Currently, the BTS daemon is offline, I've notified BCL, once its back online, that page should resume working. We've also undergone various changes over the last day to move away from using Cryptsy as they've proven incredibly unreliable in being able to process withdrawals in the last 2 days.

At first I tried to be neutral on this, but now that I see you are ignoring opposite opinions, I have to say no. The bot is annoying and creates distraction on the forum.

I don't mind having the bot here, but you have to design it so that is not spamming all the time.

If users find the bot annoying, that's a fact you just have to accept. You can't change these kind of feelings by arguing against them. It's a design problem, not lack of understanding.

use ignore button -> spam gone

I've been receiving this message intermittently for weeks, I think it might be triggered by RPC calls. Not sure what it means, I assumed it was just an innocuous debug message

   if( _subscribe_callback )  {
      for( auto id : ids )
      {
         if( id.type() == operation_history_object_type && id.space() == protocol_ids ) continue;
         if( id.type() == impl_account_transaction_history_object_type && id.space() == implementation_ids ) continue;

         this->subscribe_to_item( id );
      }
   }
   else
   {
      elog( "getObjects without subscribe callback??" );
   }

Would seem so.

The sharebot project is stupid.

What a useful comment.

On a more serious note, he's a follow up of my thoughts. I'm personally against moving the bot to strictly PMing, because lets look at this from an outsiders PoV, if you say someone writing #tip "xyz" 123 BTS, you'd have no idea what that does... but the follow up post provides an explanation, a link to where to learn more about it, etc. It self-spreads by people using the service. It also serves as a confirmation notice. I'm for whatever the community decides though.

Now, there are a few improvements that could be made to making the bot less spamful. It's posts could all be put in spoiler tags (does this forum have those? I'm sure fav knows what I'm talking about), smaller font could be used, and if say the bot went offline and needs to reply to 2/+ people all at once in the same thread it could condense all the replies into 1 post rather than several sequential posts.

I feel like a lot of the people in this thread are the kind of people who 10-20 years back thought smart phones were a dumb idea.

It is 0.04 for the entire pool, unfortunately, cryptsy is being very slow with withdrawals =/
We liquidate alts at Cryptsy move the BTC to Poloniex and then buy the BTS.

        [Cryptsy] BTC: 0.00968221
        [Unomp] scrypt BTC: 0.0345651
        [Unomp] x11 BTC: 0.01591743
        [Unomp] sha256 BTC: 0.0026986
        [Poloniex] BTC: 0.03645680

Alright I'm looking into the issues that you guys have mentioned, once again sorry for the delay, things have been pretty busy on my end, will post back with news shortly.

Edit:
Withdrawing assets (seems) to be fixed now (tested w/ BTS and BROWNIE.PTS):
http://cryptofresh.com/b/1697075

Sent Tuck a PM about looking into generating urls since when I tested it myself, it seemed to work for me Your BTS has been sent to ShareBits account hybridd(BitsharesTalk), but perhaps there's some specific conditions that can cause an error...

@JWF Found the issue with sending you your withdrawal/security code, will be fixed shortly, you should receive one within the next hour or 2, working on fixing it now. Fixed, you should have received your PM.

http://216.146.143.200/dashboard/index
Index page updated to reflect the current BTC totals of each algorithm (resets after a payout).

Predictability shown in user-panel reflects the current worth of  your miner(s), this resets every time a payout completes. -- Should be way more accurate than before!
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=www.minebitshares-com
http://216.146.143.200/Dashboard/User?address=generator (x11 miner)