166
Technical Support / Re: brainkey in wallet is currently broken.
« on: June 02, 2016, 06:24:51 pm »Could it have something to do with uppercase vs lowercase words?every word use lowercase
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
167
Technical Support / Re: brainkey in wallet is currently broken.
« on: June 02, 2016, 06:06:52 pm »
Today it DOESNOT work on chrome, cannot even type inside box, it doest not past the words too.....we have a problem
168
Technical Support / Re: brainkey in wallet is currently broken.
« on: June 02, 2016, 12:46:00 am »
Can confirm brankey restoraion is working on chrome.....delete wallets, clear data, n create account with brainkey
169
Technical Support / Re: brainkey in wallet is currently broken.
« on: June 01, 2016, 10:24:03 pm »
Did deal with it some days ago. In firefox it does not verify brainkey too.
170
Technical Support / Re: brainkey in wallet is currently broken.
« on: June 01, 2016, 10:07:18 pm »
Brankey restoration worked for me only on chrome
171
Technical Support / Re: bitshares-light_2.15.289_amd64.deb - Linux install: Error Message
« on: June 01, 2016, 08:21:37 pm »
I am using openledger but I would like to have as a security backup the dex for windows, its not available at bitshares.org broken link
172
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:55:32 am »
Thanks xeroc bishaes is so big like disney.....you take a lot of time to enjoy everything
173
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: June 01, 2016, 07:22:40 am »Price is not going anywhere without real world adoption. We should be supporting projects such as this with a worker proposal https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22576.0.htmlBicoin doesnt have real.world adoption n is valued a 500usd......
You wont see bitshares for these so fucking cheap prices for much longer n your will regret your entire life when you see the real prince coming true, people complaint too much for somenthing too big.
174
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: June 01, 2016, 03:48:59 am »
When I vote for a new proxy what the button PROPOSE>PROPOSE FROM>MYACCOUNT
means?
means?
175
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BlockPOS -Your favorite store can now accept any crypto thanx to Bitshares
« on: May 31, 2016, 09:17:16 pm »
Amazing! Any other direction? No just moooooooooooooooonnnnn bts please give me a.mooooooooon time 
176
General Discussion / Re: Merger of STEEM and BTS
« on: May 31, 2016, 03:22:39 pm »A straight merger will never happen, just forget about that. What could happen however is Bitshares deciding to adopt some of the features developed for Steem once they've proven that they work, like rate limited free transactions, market maker incentives and possibly the new pegged asset model.
One of the main issues Bitshares faces right now is the lack of interest around the market pegged assets; although the peg works fairly well the generation process through shorting/borrowing is failing to generate enough supply to make the assets viable. Steem has a new solution for this problem that could be ported to Bitshares if it turns out to be more successful. Bitshares currently does not have an ETH asset, perhaps a bitasset 2.0 could be implemented first using ETH, that could generate a lot of interest and would make it very easy for ETH holders to come trade on Bitshares. Anyway, we first need to see the new model in action in Steem, which will happen after the 4th of July..
svk, the new Steem model could not possibly overlap our market and become a competitor...
And it surely can't be used by BitShares...
I wanted to make sure Steem didn't compete with BitShares market. In fact, one of the reasons I was willing to help with Steem was that its feature set is fundamentally incompatible with BitShares and we could not hardfork BitShares to implement what Steem does.
I never said anything about Steem becoming a competitor.
There's nothing stopping us from paying CNX through worker proposal to add some features from Steem if they work out well though, like the rate limited transactions. Steem is based on Graphene so the code changes needed would not be overwhelming. What features to implement is a discussion for another day though, I'm just saying it's an option that we should consider.
Agreed svk, this way dan.can.keep goiny with steem n everybody can keep going with bts, its reasonable.for everybody, we cannot expect anything for free......but if you guys want a translation.for portuvuese of openledger i can do it for free in my spare time, bts mooooooooooooooooon!
177
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: May 31, 2016, 03:08:27 pm »
Shooooooooooooooooo me the moooooooooooooooooon bts!!!!!!!!!!!
178
General Discussion / Re: Merger of STEEM and BTS
« on: May 30, 2016, 06:51:13 pm »
Thanks danno to question regard to stealth...... My point of view......marketing shouldnt be a priority...
Lets take facebook example facebook was viral early days because of spreading word people around university.....it was growth mainly this way before reach angel investor....
Lets look poloniex, was a small.exchange, was hacked, it was pretty much fucked, until.xmr come on board n.brought a good volume after that started to pick more users, more volume e picking the best volume for the best coins. No.campaing, no promotion, just strong volume n low fee n.probably a pretty god deal with whales n market makers,
You top guys from bitshares should make some network with big vern, people from dead mintpal, n others n try to get some.contatcs with big player n see what they wnat to make dex come.true
Lets take facebook example facebook was viral early days because of spreading word people around university.....it was growth mainly this way before reach angel investor....
Lets look poloniex, was a small.exchange, was hacked, it was pretty much fucked, until.xmr come on board n.brought a good volume after that started to pick more users, more volume e picking the best volume for the best coins. No.campaing, no promotion, just strong volume n low fee n.probably a pretty god deal with whales n market makers,
You top guys from bitshares should make some network with big vern, people from dead mintpal, n others n try to get some.contatcs with big player n see what they wnat to make dex come.true
179
General Discussion / Re: Merger of STEEM and BTS
« on: May 30, 2016, 02:24:11 pm »
We just have to stabilish priorities.....what we want with dex? Make it more widespread.....ok, what do we really need to make atract more, what is really lacking? Is stealth? Is a huuuuge market maker? Is improving mpa? Lets just focus in priorities, if dex start putting strong volume people will surrender to it, n.stakeholders will start to have the control of the game, its hatd for dan to.start from.zero without big money behind him to.make a new dex for steem, we have the money, we can develop n focus n priorities n make things happen.
Regards to open assets, no problem with them, we help then then help us, we will.have gateway all around the world, that is cool, lets help them n make smartcoins happen too.
Time to.setup the train n make it left the station so we will means more hype n more money for development.
Regards to open assets, no problem with them, we help then then help us, we will.have gateway all around the world, that is cool, lets help them n make smartcoins happen too.
Time to.setup the train n make it left the station so we will means more hype n more money for development.
180
General Discussion / Re: Merger of STEEM and BTS
« on: May 30, 2016, 08:23:53 am »
Hi svk, where I can fallow these developments? Excited. Thanks.
