Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mr-whitekey

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
61
General Discussion / Re: Bitteaser and HubDPS potential?
« on: September 10, 2016, 03:12:37 pm »
If my goal is to choose a good long term investment, then and "utter shit ICO" might be indicative of an otherwise utter shit project.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk


62
General Discussion / Re: Bitteaser and HubDPS potential?
« on: September 09, 2016, 02:54:47 am »
Quote from: fav on September 08, 2016, 12:08:44 pm
The future lies in Brave like ideas and probably projects like mass.network


So what do you know about Mass? Looks like they have raised about 30 BTC to date. It seems to me that their project will need much for funding in order to pull off their stated goals. I like what I read in the white paper, but have no conception about the technical possibles.

However, if I did contribute at this point I will have a substantial stake in the project were it ever to "make it". 

63
General Discussion / Re: Bitteaser and HubDPS potential?
« on: September 08, 2016, 02:03:31 pm »
I have only had a couple minutes to look it up, but the concept seems reasonable. Thanks for sharing, I will look into it further.

At the moment it seems a minority use ad block, but I agree the trend is growing and see how the project you pointed be towards has alot to offer.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk


64
General Discussion / Bitteaser and HubDPS potential?
« on: September 07, 2016, 08:47:45 pm »
What do people think is the potential of the bit teaser project? Currently the market seems to have little confidence in it. Myself I like the idea, but have little technical knowledge to properly evaluate it. I have already put money down on the project and double down when price fell. It has a tiny market cap and if the project has a slimmer of a chance of making it I will gladly double down again, but I would like the honest opinion of my fellow bitshares ppl.

What is a realistic goal or expectation of this project say in two years?

Any ideas, thoughts or opinions welcome.

Also, is HubDPS a separate token that I need to invest in seperatly.

65
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: September 07, 2016, 02:59:14 am »
Quote from: xeroc on September 06, 2016, 08:35:26 am
Quote from: nmywn on September 05, 2016, 04:34:57 pm
Not so long ago we were about $0.0045 per share. Now it is $0.0054.
This!
Also keep in mind that we are having more and more ACTUAL companies working on BitShares and Graphene .. also thanks to Steem ..
We will actually soon see a native Steem Android App with all the transaction signing happening in Java .. THAT is the basis to also see BitShares native apps written in Java ..
as well as PHP, C# etc ... more devs looking into Graphene than EVER!

I don't really understand this. If you write it in Java how it is native to bitshares? What do you have to do different to make it compatible with bitshares?

How is this different than Lisk using JavaScript?

As far as price goes... why would the price change based on companies working on the BTS network? Are they building apps that need BTS to work? Could they use the network, but only negligibly, to get their company to work and thus not have a big impact on price?     

66
Random Discussion / Re: Monero
« on: September 04, 2016, 03:05:46 pm »
Quote from: Ander on August 27, 2016, 11:37:46 pm
Quote from: Louis on August 27, 2016, 11:15:42 pm
Hi Ander,

In your opinion which technology is better all around Bitshares or Monero?

Monero. :)

Doesnt mean i dont like bitshares though.  But it does seem to be in an eternal funk. :(
I looked at the Montero site and could not get a good indication as to why the tech is better. All I know is the basic knowledge that it is better for stealth transactions. Why would you say it I had better tech than Bitshares?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk


67
Random Discussion / Re: Monero
« on: September 03, 2016, 06:33:14 pm »
Monero is goging to pop. Anyway to short that sucker?

68
General Discussion / Re: IOTA + Bitshares
« on: September 02, 2016, 02:51:56 am »
Where are we with this project? I have seen very few updates.

69
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: August 30, 2016, 03:03:14 am »
I assume this bump is due to the peerplays sharedrop. What are your thoughts as to how much of this new influx will stay after the sharedrop date ends?


70
Other Projects / Re: BTSR Latest news. Investing in Blockchain Advertising Network made possible
« on: August 26, 2016, 12:03:00 am »
What is hubDSP?

71
General Discussion / Re: [ANN Pre-ICO]BlockPay launch pre-ICO for Echo payments app and private transacti
« on: August 25, 2016, 01:12:40 am »
Any specific explanation on what early ICO funders receive as a long term benefit? As it stands I read about profit sharing, but no clear mechanism for this or commitment to % of profits. Any news on this front? What do I get out if it?   

72
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: August 14, 2016, 10:34:22 pm »
I really need a walk though of the multisig process.  It seems like the process is intuitive enough, but I am stuck and unable to actually get my multisig set up to work.

I have two accounts. account 1 and account 2
I have set the multisig process so that account 1 has the following permissions:
    threshold 100
    Account 1 has a weight of 50
    Account 2 has a weight of 50
    BTSskfdfdsfjkdsjflksdjfksdflksdfksdfsdklfjsdkfdkfskdjf  has a weight of 1

I set this up on account 1 and the net confirmed the new permission structure

Now as a test I went to disable this structure.
1) on Account 1 I went to permissions
2) Removed account 2 and changed the new threshold to 50 and left account 1 at weight 50 and BTSfksdfkjdsfklsdlkfdslkjflsdkjflksdjflsdjdsfklsdf at weight 1
3) I submitted this as a proposal which confirmed.
4) I went to account 2 and search for account 1 (while still logged in as account 2) and approved the proposal for account 2
5) the approval confirmed
6) I went to account one found the proposal and have tried to approve the proposal from account 1 and it says I do not have permission. It gives me the option of both account 1 or BTSdkfsdjfdsjfkjsdfkjdsfjksdfhkjasd, but neither work. What am I doing wrong?

In order to do this quickly I have one account open on the web wallet and one open on the desktop client.

Any help appreciated.   

   

73
General Discussion / Re: Open Ledger Wallet Security
« on: August 10, 2016, 10:54:06 pm »
Quote from: xeroc on August 08, 2016, 08:31:28 am
The keys stored in your browser are AES256 encrypted and only accessible via the password ...
Make sure you have a backup of your wallet, then you are secure against loss or browser screwups ..
Trezor can certainly be an option .. another option is to use the rather sophisticated multisig-scheme available in BitShares

1) Just for the sake of argument, how easy would it be to brute fore attack the file with a password over 28 random charterers/numbers/symbols. I don't understand encryption enough to know how secure the file is if someone has it, is a skilled hacker and has mal intent.

2) I am setting up muiltsig wallet(s) currently, but the system will not work correctly.

a) I created two dummy accounts to test the process on.
b) I then changed the owner permission on one to need both accounts set account 1 @ 50, accounts 2 @ 50 and left the BTSXXXXXXXX code @ 1, I then changed the threshold to 100. I submitted this and all went well.
c) where I have problems is in undoings these permissions. I go to the account that is now limited (account 1) and propose that account 2 be removed and change the threshold to for account 1 to 50. This proposal is accepted, but I can not get it approved by either account.
d)I go to account 1 and click "approve", It gives me a serious of options of which I have tried every combination of and they all fail. Where am I going wrong?       

74
Technical Support / Re: I am having trouble openledger after create new account and transfered funds
« on: August 08, 2016, 04:34:41 am »
Was this ever resolved? Almost just got locked out of my account due to this issues on Edge.

75
General Discussion / Open Ledger Wallet Security
« on: August 08, 2016, 02:21:01 am »
Hi, I am sure this has been addressed before, so feel free to point me to the relevant thread, but I looked and could not find it.

I am wondering the best practice scenario for protecting your OpenLedger browser wallet. As I understand it, the keys are stored on your personal computer/browser. This leaves me open to anything from a ransom ware attack to a key-logger. Any ideas? Is there a Trezor like solution I can use? thx. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 23 queries.